THIS IS PART OF THE PIKESTANCE GENEALOGY PROJECT. IF YOU WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION PLEASE VISIT THE MAIN PAGE LOCATED IN THE SYMPOSIUM.
The Great House of
EDITOR'S NOTES_____________________________________________________________________________ 1. I am using the term "Revoked" because it is the up to date term used for Ostrakonned.
2. The Total patronages include all patronages. The "Current Members" refers to all patronages minor citizens that have resigned or have been revoked.
3. generally amusing is listed because he was patronized twice, first by Ummon. He is officially counted under the House of Rububula which includes his patronages.
4. Added Wicked per post here. Not sure wabout "Guderian"
Last edited by PikeStance; December 10, 2021 at 04:43 AM.
D you want some units back in MOS 1.7? Install this mod http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...n-1-1-RELEASED
It adds back units who were deleted from the campaign in MOS 1.7, namely the Winged Swordsmen, the Citadel Guard Archers and the Gondor Dismounted Bodyguard.
Under the proud patronage of Frunk of the house of Siblesz
There is no hard rule concerning the color coding. Ideally, I prefer to have a set color per grouping. However, sometimes there are too many to properly differentiate. Families tend to have less number of patronages per root, so it is easier to do at that levels. Essentially, the first in line inherits the color of the patronizer and so on down the line. Through the colors, you can then trace the lineage.
Last edited by PikeStance; April 04, 2018 at 10:26 PM.
What a shame that nobody I patronized has been active for years
What a depressing trip down memory lane this has been. Though I didn't realize Diamat was my grandson
I feel you.. though some of mine are active they have never been so in the Curia.
@Pike under SoulSamesInc you have (General) Dragon. listed, he renounced his patron and was adopted by me. His patron also renounced him. Hence his name these days, General Dragon.
@Pike under SoulSamesInc you have (General) Dragon. listed, he renounced his patron and was adopted by me. His patron also renounced him. Hence his name these days, General Dragon.
The genealogy project purpose is to reconstruct the patronages. The reasons for the chaos and confusion for the houses as they listed on the wiki is because of disputes among the membership throughout the history of the Curia. If you read through some of the old threads you can get a sense of why they did split the way they did. To make a long story short, I am not going to deconstruct what I have built over the past year for the very same reason why it was deconstructed. To put it another way, a father and son may have a difference that causes a split and he very well be adopted by another, but it doesn't change the initial relationship. Moreover, I do not have a mechanism for "adoptions." There is also no official means of recording this. If someone was to make a proposal formalizing this, then it would be something to implement and I would be more than happy to make the adjustment. Until such time, I am afraid I can destroy what I have carefully reconstructed. I hope everyone understands.
ps... I would be in favor of an official process for adoption/ change of patronage if someone else proposes it. I haven't given it much thought and I not sure anyone would care, but anyway.
The genealogy project purpose is to reconstruct the patronages. The reasons for the chaos and confusion for the houses as they listed on the wiki is because of disputes among the membership throughout the history of the Curia. If you read through some of the old threads you can get a sense of why they did split the way they did. To make a long story short, I am not going to deconstruct what I have built over the past year for the very same reason why it was deconstructed. To put it another way, a father and son may have a difference that causes a split and he very well be adopted by another, but it doesn't change the initial relationship. Moreover, I do not have a mechanism for "adoptions." There is also no official means of recording this. If someone was to make a proposal formalizing this, then it would be something to implement and I would be more than happy to make the adjustment. Until such time, I am afraid I can destroy what I have carefully reconstructed. I hope everyone understands.
ps... I would be in favor of an official process for adoption/ change of patronage if someone else proposes it. I haven't given it much thought and I not sure anyone would care, but anyway.
You are correct indeed. Pike however traces everything back to the original houses, no side branches or breakaways included. However as a proud member of house Hader I will never call myself a member of Siblezs
Am I incorrect in saying that the Imperial House of Hader is actually split from the rest of the House of Siblesz? The Wiki sure seems to think so.
It is explained in the link at that top of the page. This is a "genealogy" project that traces back everyone's patronages to the first one. If there are significant branches, then I separate them out. This is also explained in the link.
Originally Posted by General Brewster
You are correct indeed. Pike however traces everything back to the original houses, no side branches or breakaways included. However as a proud member of house Hader I will never call myself a member of Siblezs
It is like this. You may not like your crazy uncle, but your crazy uncle is still your uncle.
That feels like some serious pedigree. I'm very proud. And better still, not a single non-capitalised or number- or symbol-including name amongst them!
I'm joking of course. Great work again, Pike.
Have you considered including links to profiles? I realise that's quite a bit of messy work, but it might help preserve things for the future amid name changes and all that. I could possibly help.
EDIT: I'm going to favour your thread in my sig over the Wiki, which is sadly long-outdated.
I did it for the first two generations for WBK (My own "House"). There are over 1100 citizens.
I also subscribed to the name change request thread, so I will know when a citizen requests a name change I will know. Also when I run across an old name I add it to the list.
That feels like some serious pedigree. I'm very proud. And better still, not a single non-capitalised or number- or symbol-including name amongst them!
I'm joking of course. Great work again, Pike.
Have you considered including links to profiles? I realise that's quite a bit of messy work, but it might help preserve things for the future amid name changes and all that. I could possibly help.
EDIT: I'm going to favour your thread in my sig over the Wiki, which is sadly long-outdated.