The Islamic Republic of Iran has been caught doing worse stuff than the Trail of Tears, the installation of brutal dictatorships, the invasion of foreign countries and the Orange Agent? News to me, could you share some specific examples?Say what you will about our ruthless tactics to maintain American global supremacy, but we've got you doing horrible stuff, far worse stuff red-handed and out in the open. It's not even a close comparison.
Let's not pretend that American animosity towards Iran has anything to do with human rights and the theocratic elements in its government. The real reason is that the two states have conflicting interests in the Middle East and that there's some sort of bitterness, since the time the American companies lost their special privilege of exploiting Iran's natural resources at the expense of the Iranian people. Meanwhile, the US were best friends with the overthrown imperial regime, to which Khomeini paled in comparison, in terms of ruthlessness and sanguinary tendencies, not to mention, as you already said, the case of Saudi Arabia. After all, no matter how many times the crane image will be spammed, advertisement for executioners, "extra talented at amputating and beheading, as religious functionaries" is slightly more shocking:In short, quit being an authoritarian, anti-democratic, and theocratic antagonist to our planet's free peoples. Then people will quit treating you like one. No amount of pretty photographs will change this. Words are wind. Change your country and drop the religious government, or expect no media or military mercy from the rest of the world in the future.
I am certain that the Iranian people appreciates immensely your generosity, for giving them some time to readjust their internal affairs to your preference, before Its Majesty, the American government, loses its patience and decides to teach these brown natives the advantages of democracy, by force. Statements like those make me wonder how can it be possible for the "warmongering Republicans" to be even more hawkish...If Iran's citizens continued to shift and change the country from within, would giving them time to do so be preferable to war? Absolutely and certainly. A lot of us aren't like the warmongering Republican-types you hear from, but at the same time if push comes to shove we're going to be prepared to do what we need to do to safeguard secular freedom on this planet.
No, their handling is unreliable. After all, they already have IKCO and SAIPA.Y'all need Mazda.
It is true, peasants always tended to be less educated and more conservative and religious than the city folk, but I would say that this is a global phenomenon and not limited only to the east. Even in the latest elections and referendums, any map will show that older parties and more conservative ideologies are always more prevalent in the countryside and the smaller urban centers.Is this true?
[...] but at the same time if push comes to shove we're going to be prepared to do what we need to do to safeguard secular freedom on this planet.
yes.all of it was true except educationI have a theory that no one believes.
In non-Western countries the rural population and the urban populations are very different. The people that live in the country side tend to be uneducated and even think differently than the people in the cities. The people living in the rural country side are also much less westernized.
Is this true?
Have you studied about the IRI governments democracy system?It's Islamic form of democracy in Iran.Also do you want a direct Democracy the kind that we have in the West? What is the opinion of most people in Iran?
I am really proud of you brother fardin for writing this.Great job man.
If we wanted we would do it right now with our missiles but we do not target innocent people unlike other countries who claim the freedom and Human rights. when we say we'll wipe off Israel we mean the government and same for other countries.Those lands you see on the google earth belongs to the Palestinians who were forced to leave their Homes and lands.Islam forbids conquering lands.the iranians keep promising to wipe israel off the map but every day i look at google earth and i still see israel on the map.
what gives?
Most of the people who fled Iran have your opinion but the poor people who remained in Iran had tasted the dictators oppressions.Rich class of society were Opposed to Revolution because they had nothing to do with protests because of their full bellies.You say electing in Iran is a joke so what's your proof?My mother is origianlly from Iran, whose family left during the revolution to the west. I am wondering, if things have turned to the better than they once were. Years of forced isolation and hateful speech against western values which are returning slowly despite the so called 'islamic' revolution. My country is getting political refugees, not only from Syria, Afghanistan but also Iran, still today. Making a thread about how wonderful things are going politically is just a farce.
I accept Iran is to a degree better than Saudi Arabia and most states in the middle east. But coming here and telling me that Irans political parties are freely elected is a joke.
If I came back tomorrow to Iran and wanted to start a political party rejecting Islamic and theological leadership, which ruined the once most powerful country in the middle east, I would be a political prisoner.
Most of the people who fled Iran have your opinion but the poor people who remained in Iran had tasted the dictator.Rich class of society were Opposed to Revolution.You say electing in Iran is a joke so what's your proof?
that 8 years of war ruined the country not the leadership.You said powerful Iran You mean from the military aspect?That dictator sold the country to the west to Gain some chaffy reputation so when he fled before revolution no country supported him because he was not useful anymore! Go see the ranking of Iran's army!But I must say It's the ranking of regular Armies and it does not Include IRGC.The IRGC is ten times bigger and more powerful than IRI Army.
What do you mean by better equipment?Because we do not make films it does not mean we do not have good equipments.If you know farsi I'll send you some links to see Iran's equipments.what do you mean by begging Saddam?Iranian army. Lol. Everybody in the region is using better equipment, because they can buy it from western and Russian allies. Irans military is the same it was 30 years ago, because they got no strong allies. Why? Because the leadership are a bunch of trolls. And tell me please, who intentionally weakened the Shahs army during the revolution out of fear? You were just begging for Saddam, who had an eye on Iran, to invade. The Shah left because he maybe didn't want to harm the people with a bloody civil war. I am not going into Mullah war tactics, like children playing minesweeper.
I know plenty of Iranians, who are doing everything to get an EU citizenship. Says a lot about the current state.
You live in the shadow of the country it once was, destroyed by illiterate fools and call it great now. Being a western ally doesn't make you a puppet state. But when I see Iranian presidents rambling off about foreign policy and describing the west, it has a lot of similarity with the muppet show.
Your definition is close to reality.Conquests is forbidden but you are allowed: 1.when any country attacks you.you have the right to attack that country and eliminate it's government 2.when a non muslim country attacks a muslim country you have the right to eliminate it's government 3.when a non muslim country oppresses the other muslims you have the right to eliminate it's government.And attacking civilians and looting and forcing them to Islam is forbidden according to Mr.Khamenei's Fatwa(order) and Orders of God in Quran.Also going back to my previous question, let's say that I accept "Mohammad only conquered in self defense". But what is the theological basis for conquest being forbidden in the first place?
Oh, that is golden. Well, the Shah apparently was not so scared about the possibility of a civil war, when he overthrew Mosaddegh or when he imprisoned and tortured everyone belonging to the opposition, from communists and liberals to Shia fundamentalists, for daring to disapprove of his tyrannical tactics. Could it be because during these events, there was not the most massive revolution ever recorded going on, which presented to the Shah the somewhat worrying prospect of sharing the fate of his SAVAK chiefs? Reza Pahlavi ran for his life, which was the most sensible thing to do or otherwise he would have been arrested and judged for his crimes against the Iranian people.The Shah left because he maybe didn't want to harm the people with a bloody civil war.
Modern Iran was never the most powerful state in the Middle East, not even under the Shah. But even if it was, why does it matter? People justifiably tend to care more about their quality of life, democratic elections and protection from the para-military activities of the secret police. Being given that, despite the most sincere efforts of the Assembly of Experts and the Guardian Council, all these aspects have been radically improved since the times of the Shah, I understand why the vast majority of the Iranians despise the imperial regime.If I came back tomorrow to Iran and wanted to start a political party rejecting Islamic and theological leadership, which ruined the once most powerful country in the middle east, I would be a political prisoner.
We respect individual human beings, not beliefs or groups. We "believe" only in things that can be proven and understood. Religious and/or political belief, on the other hand, is just an excuse for people to act out their worst instincts. The evidence suggests that all religions and gods were invented by men, not the other way round.I always get surprised by those who claim to enlightenment, but they do not feel ashamed when they insult the beliefs of others
The Iraqi invasion did indeed help the radical clergy to remain in power. But I can't see why this is the fault of Khomeini. The Iraqis invaded with the intention of violating at least the Algiers Accords, which were ironically negotiated by Saddam himself (back then, Saddam was not the absolute ruler of Iraq) and Iran had every right to defend its territorial sovereignty. True, as it always happens in these cases, the radical revolutionaries were strengthened, when faced a common foreign aggressor, in spite of Saddam's wishful thinking that Iran would immediately collapse. But again, Iran is not to be blamed for the Iraqi leadership's complete inability to properly estimate the internal olitical affairs of Iran. Oh, that is golden. Well, the Shah apparently was not so scared about the possibility of a civil war, when he overthrew Mosaddegh or when he imprisoned and tortured everyone belonging to the opposition, from communists and liberals to Shia fundamentalists, for daring to disapprove of his tyrannical tactics. Could it be because during these events, there was not the most massive revolution ever recorded going on, which presented to the Shah the somewhat worrying prospect of sharing the fate of his SAVAK chiefs? Reza Pahlavi ran for his life, which was the most sensible thing to do or otherwise he would have been arrested and judged for his crimes against the Iranian people. Modern Iran was never the most powerful state in the Middle East, not even under the Shah. But even if it was, why does it matter? People justifiably tend to care more about their quality of life, democratic elections and protection from the para-military activities of the secret police. Being given that, despite the most sincere efforts of the Assembly of Experts and the Guardian Council, all these aspects have been radically improved since the times of the Shah, I understand why the vast majority of the Iranians despise the imperial regime.
We respect individual human beings, not beliefs or groups. We "believe" only in things that can be proven and understood. Religious and/or political belief, on the other hand, is just an excuse for people to act out their worst instincts. The evidence suggests that all religions and gods were invented by men, not the other way round.
Anyway, why do you feel the need to believe in an invisible Arab in the sky? Are you familiar with how Islam was introduced in Iran, or does the IRI school curriculum skip that part of history?
I doubt that. I studied it, as did several other people on this forum.We know our history far better than you!
I think it was rather Mohammad and his friends who hated Iran and Iranians. They provided the excuses and "justification" for those atrocities.As I said before the false successors of the prophet made those horrible mistakes.
And because the bearers of the same perfect religion murdered, raped, and enslaved your countrymen until the rest of them submitted.We accepted Islam because it was a perfect religion for the human beings.
I haven't insulted anyone yet, except perhaps those who teach history in Iran. Things that don't exist can't be insulted.I said I want a fair and polite debate.If you want to do it so please do not insult.
I have read dozens of books about it.you can not claim that!and they are already in my library.so please...I doubt that. I studied it, as did several other people on this forum.
I accept that the Arabs hated Iran because they were colonies of Iranian Empires for many years.But the Prophet and Imam Ali are different from them. they had some companions and friends of Iranians like Salman Farsi who helped the Prophet in "Ahzab" war with battle plans.And Ghanbar who was a slave that Imam Ali liberated him and then he became his friend and companion.I think it was rather Mohammad and his friends who hated Iran and Iranians. They provided the excuses and "justification" for those atrocities.
And because the bearers of the same perfect religion murdered, raped, and enslaved your countrymen until the rest of them submitted.
You said:The evidence suggests that all religions and gods were invented by men, not the other way round.I haven't insulted anyone yet, except perhaps those who teach history in Iran. Things that don't exist can't be insulted.
The wiki has a portal for every game in the Total War Series.
Games from the original Shogun Total War, to Total War:Pharaoh are covered.
Information ranges from system requirements to load the games, to details on how to make a total conversion mod.
The Wiki's Modding Portal is the place to start looking for modding information.
The Wiki has Modding Index pages for most Total War games, listing tools, tutorials and resources.
View Total War Mods to find modifications that have already been undertaken.
As one of the most adaptable Total War games, naturally M2TW has a host of information on the Wiki:
You can view all the wiki content without an account.
However, do please apply for a wiki account, if you would like to edit pages, or save your viewing preferences.
Post in the TWC Wiki forum if you have any queries.
The Wiki has content for all three 'Rome' Total War games:
For more information about TWC past and present see: