As I perused the BBC website I noticed this article.
A pretty interesting article.Originally Posted by Article
As I perused the BBC website I noticed this article.
A pretty interesting article.Originally Posted by Article
That is kinda weird, but... I have the feeling I heard something about it somewhere.
well, what we have to do is wait for the researchers to expand their researches and make more discoveries that should clear the path a little more.
PS: Waiting for more posts to debate on this matter. it's interesting, indeed.
"God forbid that I should go to any Heaven where there are no horses" - R.B. Cunningham-Graham
Does it really come as that much of a surprise? Birds are the further evolution of dinosaurs into modern day, after all.
Well, people (humans but lets be neutral lol), are closely related to tree shrews![]()
Last edited by Vanquisher; April 13, 2007 at 10:09 PM.
True in a sense. The earliest primates during the late Cretaceous were basically tree-dwelling glires with opposable thumbs and binocular vision. They evolved to larger, more complex forms only after the asteroid impacts and climate shifts had eliminated the largest of the dinosaurs from the ecosystems of Earth.
I read about this in the paper today. I'd say the most interesting part of this story is that the organic material found inside the bone is still relatively intact, even retaining it's elasticity.
Patronized by happyho in the Legion of Rahl
Originally Posted by Eugene Debs
A fellow Palaeontologist?![]()
Last edited by Vanquisher; April 14, 2007 at 02:21 AM.
Glad to see people are interested in palaeontology here.![]()
Well, not only the chickens are linked to T-rex, as we have seen. There are many more links that are sometimes more bizarre: an insect that was once a dinosaur, for example.
"God forbid that I should go to any Heaven where there are no horses" - R.B. Cunningham-Graham
QFE. What the hell are you talking about, eqcards?
Errr... Binocular vision? Isn't that a common feature for all vertebrates (except those that are blind, such as moles), mammals and dinosaurs alike? Or is it only binocular if both eyes are facing forward?
Last edited by Beiss; April 14, 2007 at 05:24 AM.
Under the patronage of Halie Satanus, Emperor of Ice Cream, in the house of wilpuri
I'm pretty sure it's only if both eyes face forwards. Most vertebrates have their eyes facing slightly more spaced out, or totally off to the sides- antelope, example.
True. Most scientists say that the majority of dinosaurs were not covered in scales, but rather in a leathery skin-like covering, much like birds, and had down feathers covering their bodies, for warmth mainly.
Last edited by MaximiIian; April 14, 2007 at 05:00 PM.
"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others." - Animal Farm
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?" - Douglas Adams (RIP)
Patronized by imb39. House of wilpuri... go fightin' dubyas!
Member of S.I.N.
Well some scientists defend the T-rex was covered in feathers back in the day.
Under Patronage of MARCVS
Under the patronage of Halie Satanus, Emperor of Ice Cream, in the house of wilpuri
Not quite the big scary monster you imagined uh?
Under Patronage of MARCVS
Now here's the kicker: T Rex is more closely related to chickens than to other carnosaurs such as the Allosaurids, so not only are birds just feathered dinosaurs, T rex is actually a direct descendent of a stem avian.
i dont know dude, those claws and teeth look pretty big to me.Not quite the big scary monster you imagined uh?
Yeah, for some reason a feathered T rex seems scarier. Perhaps it's the unknown about it...we're used to seeing the scaly version of it.
Here's some other pics of feathered dinos, again I'm more scared of them than the traditional views.
I believe this is a Deinonychus.