Downloading problem 0.90 - therefore update 0.94.1 available

[Melkz]

Thread/title edited by DaVinci - See post 8 or 10.

Hi... im melkz
1 day i see in internet this mod and i start to play it.
I think "This mod its Great" but now . .. i want to download the 0. 90
(I have 0.65 )

but i can't the first link stops downloading at 9 mb.. says "download finished" but the file its corrupted or wrong (because only 9 mb)

so i try the filefront 2 links and only send me to filefront main page .. or the "download button" appears but i click it and to main page again..

Please can any 1 give me a link for 0.90? Thx

Melkz

[DaVinci]

Welcome and thanks for pointing to this, i just checked the Filefront dl-links:
You are right, somebody obviously removed the both filefront dl-links of 0.90 ... i have no clue how this could've happened as i personally only gave free the removal of the 0.50 dl-file (maybe there are some noob-staff by the filefront-admins or somebody hijacked my filefront-account), actually atm. there is only the (slow-connection) dl-link from uploaded.to, which works for me, just tested.
We'll see, that we can offer a 0.90 mirror again, soon.

[Melkz]

Thx i will try to download it againd and try and retry maybe it can work

[DaVinci]

Thx i will try to download it againd and try and retry maybe it can work

Hmm, i at least dl'ed until ca. 12 MB without probs, and then i stopped it, as i think the dl would working further ... hope you get it, and that your connection isn't too slow

[Melkz]

nope... i try and try but it stops ... the last time a t 74 mb

[DaVinci]

nope... i try and try but it stops ... the last time a t 74 mb

Hm, must have to do with the internet-connection. At the moment, just go with 0.65 plus the hotfixes for this build (all is to find at the bottom of the pinned DL-topic), this former version isn't that bad, and 0.90 is not a total other build compared to 0.65, mainly 0.90 is a bit harder in some affairs.

I guess, we'll have soon one new 0.90 mirror.

[Ataegina]

weird...

i've tried and this have work fine for me :p

[Dreadking]

Is this version of the mod using the mod switch command so i can have it simultaneously installed with other mods like EB and RTR?

[DaVinci]

Is this version of the mod using the mod switch command so i can have it simultaneously installed with other mods like EB and RTR?

Welcome, i will try to explain it as following:

Chivalry uses since at least its version 0.34 the CA -mod functionality (own mod folder). The Chiv installation doesn't change any of the RTW or BI vanilla files.

[Actually, the item "Mod-Switch" is known by me in another relation through merely an extra "Mod-Switcher Software", that went through the community in the past. So, Chiv doesn't need any of those extra-tools (and there shouldn't be used any extra-switch-software for Chivalry).]

... only install the chivalry folder into the RTW folder, provide the shortcut-path eventully (see contained shortcut/-instructions within the chivalry folder), and play. You can find a lot info in the pinned FAQ, and also in the recent and still pinned 0.90 DL-Topic about these things.

In interaction with EB or RTR ... i'm not sure about their installs, as i mean to know that some RTW vanilla files are changed by their installs. It is possible, that the interface has some coincidences then* ... eventually try to find out, which files EB and RTR changes in the vanilla data structure.

*such effects you can see in Dtrad's AAR-screenies (non-Chiv faction icons, and non-Chiv building-panel background in the campaign mode).

To make it a bit more clear: If you install Chivalry into a RTW directory where already EB or RTRPE (their -mod version) is installed, then there might be not any problem, vice versa, it could happen that you have some interface-parts from EB or RTRPE within Chivalry what wouldn't add to the medieval flavor of Chivalry, but as said, i'm absolutely not sure, which or if their installs change vanilla files. Eventually better ask in their forums for vanilla-file-changes in relation to their -mod installation.

However, in any case, the mods will work parallel.

[Dreadking]

I'll install Chivalry and see how it goes then. Thanks for the info DaVinci and the great mod!

[thoscme]

are unit cards supposed to be all big and "rough"? they don't look like they used to..

[DaVinci]

are unit cards supposed to be all big and "rough"? they don't look like they used to..

"rough"

Not in my case ... they're looking all fine.
Eventually check your preferences settings, should be:
32Bit_UI:TRUE
... as well all other settings where 32bit is offered, i would set it on TRUE. But that might depend on your system, note, Rome vanilla has those settings on FALSE.

[BNS]

crap, double post.......

[BNS]

are unit cards supposed to be all big and "rough"? they don't look like they used to..

i dont know what you are trying to say with 'rough' , but they are different and many new ones where added there should only be a few unit with out cards now

[DaVinci]

i dont know what you are trying to say with 'rough' , but they are different and many new ones where added there should only be a few unit with out cards now

Actually, i guess, he is refering to the unit icons, and its appearence/displayed resolution ... and not to the unit info cards.

Also, eventually he should check his main resolution-setting of the campaign mode.

[thoscme]

nono, in custom battle, the unit cards are all, uhm.. rough?
i'm not english, so i can't explain myself so good, i'll give it a shot though..

the unit that is shown on the card is, uhm, looking all rough on the edges, the lines are not straight, and i have a problem to see what the unit look like..!
and, when in battle, it is the same with the general on the UI, the minimal_ui in preferences are set on false..
also, the buildings are.. rough? lol
the building icon is not as it is supposed to be like..
this is on the campaign map, when pressing a city, you get all the buldings on the UI under

understandable? i will see if i can take a screen..

[DaVinci]

nono, in custom battle, the unit cards are all, uhm.. rough?
i'm not english, so i can't explain myself so good, i'll give it a shot though..

the unit that is shown on the card is, uhm, looking all rough on the edges, the lines are not straight, and i have a problem to see what the unit look like..!
and, when in battle, it is the same with the general on the UI, the minimal_ui in preferences are set on false..
also, the buildings are.. rough? lol
the building icon is not as it is supposed to be like..
this is on the campaign map, when pressing a city, you get all the buldings on the UI under

understandable? i will see if i can take a screen..

I understand without a shot what you mean. And this is the reason as i put an EDIT comment into the release topic about the preferences and the game-settings, and everybody could either, as said, put in their Rome vanilla preferences and customise it again, or let it as it is (as said, only the vanilla auto-save might be a source for vanilla produced ctd's).
Unit cards are for me the bigger 'unit info cards' (with unit description), and the little cards are for me 'unit icons', but that all are are unit-ui's, lol.

[thoscme]

I understand without a shot what you mean. And this is the reason as i put an EDIT comment into the release topic about the preferences and the game-settings, and everybody could either, as said, put in their Rome vanilla preferences and customise it again, or let it as it is (as said, only the vanilla auto-save might be a source for vanilla produced ctd's).
Unit cards are for me the bigger 'unit info cards' (with unit description), and the little cards are for me 'unit icons', but that all are are unit-ui's, lol.

ahaa, okay, that makes more sense.
lol, didn't understand what you meant with "unit icons".
thanks, i'll give it a shot ()

yeah, it works!! thanks davinci, omg, love the new cusader units!

[The White Knight]

Is it possible to upload the mod (0.94) to an alternate location as well? I have some problems with Filefront.

[Ataegina]

Is it possible to upload the mod (0.94) to an alternate location as well? I have some problems with Filefront.

i recommend you, to still/download the previous version 0.90, because the version 0.94 have some bugs !!