Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 137

Thread: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    13,967

    Default FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    all discussion and progress of this faction goes here


    DESCRIPTION

    UNITS



    BARRACKS
    • Tier 1: Khorasani Spearmen
    • Tier 2: Daylami Tribesmen
    • Tier 2: Ghazni Spearmen
    • Tier 3: Ghulam Spearmen
    • Tier 4: Daylami Infantry [Limited AOR]
    • *Possibly* Tier 4: *Name undetermined*
    • Tier 5: Daylami Assault Infantry
    • Tier 5: Heavy Khorasani Spearmen
      Maybe we could go for a different name, something Khorasan-based, but not with the term Heavy. Perhaps Ghaznavid Guard.
    ARCHERY RANGE
    • Tier 1: Eastern Turkoman Foot Archer
    • Tier 1: Punjabi Skirmishers
    • Tier 2: Ghaznavid Archers
    • Tier 3: Ghazni Ghulam Archers
    • Possibly Tier 4: Khorasani Archers
    STABLES
    • Tier 1: Eastern Turkoman Cavalry
    • Tier 1: Punjabi Skirmishers
    • Tier 2: Ghaznavid Cavalry
    • Tier 3:
    • Tier 4:
    • Tier 5: Khorasani Lancers
    SLAVE TRADE
    • Tier 3:
    • Tier 4: Palace Ghulams:
    • Tier 4: Royal Ghulams:


    SYMBOL AND BANNERS

    NAMES

    Last edited by Ahiga; June 28, 2007 at 07:53 AM.

  2. #2

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    ghaznavids:


    (AD 977–1186), Turkish dynasty that ruled in Khorāsān (in northeastern Iran), Afghanistan, and northern India.

    The founder of the dynasty was Sebüktigin(ruled 977–997), a former Turkish slave who was recognized by the Sāmānids (an Iranian Muslim dynasty) as governor of Ghazna (modern Ghaznī, Afg.). As the Sāmānid dynasty weakened, Sebüktigin consolidated his position and expanded his domains as far as the Indian border. His son Maḥmūd (ruled 998–1030) continued the expansionist policy, and by 1005 the Sāmānid territories had been divided. The river Oxus formed the boundary between the two successor states to the Sāmānid Empire, the Ghaznavids ruling in the west and the Qarakhanids in the east.

    Ghaznavid power reached its zenith during Maḥmūd's reign. He created an empire that stretched from the Oxus to the Indus Valley and the Indian Ocean; in the west he captured (from the Būyids) the Iranian cities of Rayy and Hamadan. A devout Muslim, Maḥmūd reshaped the Ghaznavids from their pagan Turkic origins into an Islāmic dynasty and expanded the frontiers of Islām. The Persian poet Ferdowsī (d. 1020) completed his epic Shah-nāmeh (“Book of Kings”) at the court of Maḥmūd about 1010.

    Maḥmūd's son Masʿūd I (reigned 1031–41) was unable to preserve the power or even the integrity of the Ghaznavid empire. In Khorāsān and Khwārezm, Ghaznavid power was challenged by the Seljuq Turks. Masʿūd suffered a disastrousdefeat at the Battle of Dandānqān (1040), whence all the Ghaznavid territories in Iran and Central Asia were lost to theSeljuqs. The Ghaznavids were left in possession of eastern Afghanistan and northern India, where they continued to ruleuntil 1186, when Lahore fell to the Ghūrids.

    Little survives of Ghaznavid art, but the period is important for its influence on the Seljuq Turks in Iran and on later Islāmic art in India.

    The Ghaznavids introduced the “four eyvān ” ground plan in the palace at Lashkarī Bāzār near Lashkarī Gāh, on a plateau above the Helmond River, just north of Qalʾeh-ye Best, Afghanistan. An eyvān is a large vaulted hall, closed on threesides and open to a court on the fourth. The motif of a court surrounded by four eyvāns dominated Seljuq mosque architecture and was used continually through the Timurid and Ṣafavid periods in Persia. The victory tower of Masʿūd III (built 1099–1115) is a precursor of the Seljuq türbe (q.v.), or tomb-tower. Of its two original stories, the remaining one is largely covered with ornamental inscription. Excavations at the site of the palace at Lashkarī Bāzār have uncovered figurative paintings whose stylistic elements are similar to early Seljuq work.

    and for the city of ghazni itself:

    formerly Ghazna, city, east-central Afghanistan. It lies beside the Ghaznī River on a high plateau at an elevation of 7,300 feet (2,225 m). Afghanistan's only remaining walled town, it is dominated by a 150-foot- (45-metre-) high citadel built inthe 13th century. Around the nearby village of Rowẓeh-e Sultan, on the old roadto Kābul (the nation's capital, 80 miles [130 km] northeast), are the ruins of ancient Ghazna, including two 140-foot (43-metre) towers and the tomb of Maḥmūd of Ghazna (971–1030), the most powerful emir (or sultan) of the Ghaznavid dynasty.

    Ghaznī's early history is obscure; it has probably existed at least since the 7th century. Early in the 11th century, under Maḥmūd of Ghazna, the town became the capital of the vast empire of the Ghaznavids, Afghanistan's first Muslim dynasty. The dynasty lost much of its power later in the same century, and Ghaznī was sacked in 1150–51 by the Ghūrids. The town was fought over by various peoples before the Mongols secured it by 1221. They ruled the area until Timur (Tamerlane), the Turkic conqueror, arrived in the 14th century, and his descendants ruled it until 1504, when the Indian Mughals took Ghaznī and Kābul. In 1747, under Aḥmad Shāh Durrānī, Ghaznī became part of the new Afghan kingdom. It was captured by the British during the First Anglo-Afghan War (1839–42). Ghaznī recovered some importance when it became the main town on the Kābul-Qandahār highway.

  3. #3

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    just got this book on indian history... unfortunately, there's not too much on the Ghanzi, while drowsiman has covered most of it i think. However, the book did supply me with lots of names so:
    NAMES LIST
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

    Code:
    Male Names:
    Bahram
    Khusrav
    Mahmud
    
    Surnames:
    Shah
    Malik

  4. #4
    1942ertan's Avatar Foederatus
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Turkey
    Posts
    33

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni


    Here is the Gazni flag

    And


    Alptigin(alptekin)

    Ghazni sultans
    Alptigin (963-977)
    Abu Mansur Sebük Tigin Khan (977-997)
    Ismail (997-998)
    Yamin ud-Dawlah Mahmud (998-1030)
    Jalal ud-Dawlah Mohammed (1030-1031)
    Shihab ud-Dawlah Mas'ud I (1031–1041)
    Jalal ud-Dawlah Mohammed (second time) (1041)
    Shihab ud-Dawlah Maw'dud (1041-1050)
    Mas'ud II (1050)
    Baha ud-Dawlah Ali (1050)
    Izz ud-Dawlah Abd ul-Rashid (1053)
    Qiwam ud-Dawlah Toğrül (Tughril) (1053)
    Jamal ud-Dawlah Farrukhzad (1053-1059)
    Zahir ud-Dalah Ibrahim (1059-1099)
    Ala ud-Dawlah Mas'ud III (1099-1115)
    Kemal ud-Dawlah Shirzad (1115)
    Sultan ud-Dawlah Arslan Shah (1115-11180
    Yamin ud-Dawlah Bahram Shah (1118-1152)
    Mu'izz ud-Dawlah Khusrau Shah (1152-1160)
    Taj ud-Dawlah Khusrau Malik (1160-1187)
    Nasher Khans, later Ghilzai Khans (from the 16th century)


  5. #5

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    Found via Afghan Friends Network Inc
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

    HISTORY OF GHAZNI
    Ghazni's early history is obscure; it has probably existed at least since the 7th century. Early in the 11th century, under Mahmud of Ghazna, the town became the capital of the vast empire of the Ghaznavids, Afghanistan's first Muslim dynasty. The dynasty lost much of its power later in the same century, and Ghazni was sacked in 1150-51 by the Ghurids. The town was fought over by various peoples before the Mongols secured it by 1221. They ruled the area until Timur (Tamerlane), the Turkic conqueror, arrived in the 14th century, and his descendants ruled it until 1504, when the Mughals took Ghazni and Kabul. In 1747, under Ahmad Shah Durrani, Ghazni became part of the new Afghan kingdom.

    The city is not mentioned by any narrator of Alexanders expedition, nor by any ancient author so as to admit of positive recognition. But it is very possibly the Gazaca which Ptolemy places among the Paropamisadae, and this may not be inconsistent with Sir H. Rawlinsons identification of it with Gazos, an Indian city spoken of by two obscure Greek poets as an impregnable place of war. The name is probably connected with the Persian and Sanskrit ganj and ganja, a treasury (whence the Greek and Latin Gaza). We seem to have positive evidence of the existence of the city before the Mahommedan times (644) in the travels of the Chinese pilgrim, Hsuan Tsang, who speaks of Ho-si-na (i.e. probably Ghazni) as one of the capitals of Tsaukuta or Arachosia, a place of great strength. In early Mahommedan times the country adjoining Ghazni was called Zdbul. When the Mahommedans first invaded that region Ghazni was a wealthy entrepot of the Indian trade. Of the extent of this trade some idea is given by Ibn Haukal, who states that at Kabul, then a mart of the same trade, there was sold yearly indigo to the value of two million dinars. The enterprise of Islam underwent several ebbs and flows over this region. The provinces on the Helmund and about Ghazni were invaded as early as the caliphate of Moaiya (662680). The arms of Yaqub b. Laith swept over Kabul and Arachosia (Al-Rukhaj) about 871, and the people of the latter country were forcibly converted. Though the Hindu dynasty of Kabul held a part of the valley of Kabul river till the time of Mahmud, it is probably to the period just mentioned that we must refer the permanent Muslim occupation of Ghazni. Indeed, the building of the fort and city is ascribed by a Muslim historian to Amr b. Laith, the brother and successor of Yakub (d. 901), though the facts already stated discredit this. In the latter part of the 9th century the family of the Samanid, sprung from Samarkand, reigned in splendour at Bokhara. Alptagin, originally a Turkish slave, and high in the service of the dynasty, about the middle of the 10th century, losing the favor of the court, wrested Ghazni from its chief (who is styled Abu Bakr Lawik, wali of Ghazni), and established himself there. His government was recognized from Bokhara, and held till his death. In 977 another Turk slave, Sabuktagin, who had married the daughter of his master Alptagin, obtained rule in Ghazni. He made himself lord of nearly all the present territory of Afghanistan and of the Punjab. In 997 Mahmud, son of Sabuktagin, succeeded to the government, and with his name Ghazni and the Ghaznevid dynasty have beome perpetually associated. Issuing forth year after year from that capital, Mahmud (q.v.) carried fully seventeen expeditions of devastation through northern India and Gujarat, as well as others to the north and west. From the borders of Kurdistan to Samarkand, from the Caspian to the Ganges, his authority was acknowledged. The wealth brought back to Ghazni was enormous, and contemporary historians give glowing descriptions of the magnificence of the capital, as well as of the conquerors munificent support of literature. Mahmud died in 1030, and some fourteen kings of his house came after him; but though there was some revival of importance under Ibrahim (1059-1099), the empire never reached anything like the same splendour and power. It was overshadowed by the Seljuks of Persia, and by the rising rivalry of Ghor (q.v.), the hostility of which it had repeatedly provoked. Bahram Shah (11 181152) put to death Kutbuddin, one of the princes of Ghor, called king of the Jibal or Hill country, who had withdrawn to Ghazni. This princes brother, Saifuddin Sun, came to take vengeance, and drove out Bahram. But the latter recapturing the place (1149) paraded Saifuddin and his vizier ignominiously about the city, and then hanged them on the bridge. Ala-uddin of Ghor, younger brother of the two slain princes, then gathered a great host, and came against Bahram, who met him on the Helmund. The Ghori prince, after repeated victories, stormed Ghazni, and gave it over to fire and sword. The dead kings of the house of Mahmud, except the conqueror himself and two others, were torn from their graves and burnt, whilst the bodies of the princes of Ghor were solemnly disinterred and carried to the distant tombs of their ancestors. It seems certain that Ghazni never recovered the splendour that perished then (1152). Ala-uddin, who from this deed became known in history as Ja/thn-soz (Brfiiemonde), returned to Ghor, and Bahram reoccupied Ghazni; he died in 1157. In the time of his son Khusru Shah, Ghazni was taken by the Turkish tribes called Ghuzz (generally believed to have been what are now called Turkomans). The king fled to Lahore, and the dynasty ended with his son. In 1173 the Ghuzz were expelled by Ghiyasuddin sultan of Ghor (nephew of Ala-uddin Jahansoz), who made Ghazni over to his brother Muizuddin. This famous prince, whom the later historians call Mahommed Ghori, shortly afterwards (f 174a-1175) invaded India, taking Multan and Uchh. This was the first of many successive inroads on western and northern India, in one of which Lahore was wrested from Khusru Malik, the last of Mahmuds house, who died a captive in the hills of Ghor. In 1192 Prithvi Rai or Pithora (as the Moslem writers call him), the Chauhan king of Ajmere, being defeated and slain near Thanewar, the whole country from the Himalaya to Ajmere became subject to the Ghori king of Ghazni. On the death of his brother Ghiyasuddin, with whose power he had been constantly associated, and of whose conquests he had been the chief instrument, Muizuddin became sole sovereign over Ghor and Ghazni, and the latter place was then again for a brief period the seat of an empire nearly as extensive as that of Mahmud the son of Sabuktagin. Muizuddin crossed the Indus once more to put down a rebellion of the Khokhars in the Punjab, and on his way back was murdered by a band of them, or, as some say, by one of the Mulahidak or Assassins. The slave lieutenants of Muizuddin carried on the conquest of India, and as the rapidly succeeding events broke their dependence on any master, they established at Delhi that monarchy of which, after it had endured through many dynasties, and had culminated with the Mogul house of Baber, the shadow perished in 1857. The death of Muizuddin was followed by struggle and anarchy, ending for a time in the annexation of Ghazni to the empire of Khwarizm by Mahommed Shah, who conferred it on his famous son, Jelaluddin, and Ghazni became the headquarters of the latter. After Jenghiz Khan had extinguished the power of his family in Turkestan, Jelaluddin defeated the army sent against him by the Mongol at Parwan, north of Kabul. Jenghiz then advanced and drove Jelaluddin across the Indus, afterwhich he sent Ogdai his son to besiege Ghazni. Henceforward Ghazni is much less prominent in Asiatic history. It continued subject to the Mongols, sometimes to the house of Hulagu in Persia, and sometimes to that of Jagatai in Turkestan. In 1326 after a battle between Amir Hosain, the viceroy of the formei house in Khorasan, and Tarmashirin, the reigning khan 01 Jagatai, the former entered Ghazni and once more subjected it to devastation, and this time the tomb of Mahmud to desecration, Ibn Batuta (c. 1332) says the greater part of the city was in ruins, and only a small part continued to be a town. Timur seems never to have visited Ghazni, but we find him in 1401 bestowing the government of Kabul, Kandahar, and Ghazni on Pir Mahommed, the son of his son Jahangir. In the end of the century it was still in the hands of a descendant of Timur, Ulugh Beg Mirza, who was king of Kabul and Ghazni. The illustrious nephew of this prince, Baber, got peaceful possession of both cities in 1504, and has left notes on both in his own inimitable Memoirs. His account of Ghazni indicates how far it had now fallen. It is, he says, but a poor mean place, and I have always wondered how its princes, who possessed also Hindustan and Khorasan, could have chosen such a wretched country for the seat of their government, in preference to Khorasan. He commends the fruit of its gardens, which still contribute largely to the markets of Kabul. Ghazni remained in the hands of Babers descendants, reigning at Delhi and Agra, till the invasion of Nadir Shah (1738), and became after Nadirs death a part of the new kingdom of the Afghans under Ahmad Shah Durani. We know of but two modern travellers who have recorded visits to the place previous to the war of 1839. George Forster passed as a disguised traveller with a qafila in 1783. Its slender existence, he says, is now maintained by some Hindu families, who support a small traffic, and supply the wants of the few Mahommedan residents. Vigne visited it in 1836, having reached it from Multan with a caravan of Lohani merchants,travelling by the Gomal pass. The historical name of Ghazni was brought back from the dead, as it were, by the news of its capture by the British army under Sir John Keane, 23rd July 1839. The siege artillery had been left behind at Kandahar; escalade was judged impracticable; but the project of the commanding engineer, Captain George Thomson, for blowing in the Kabul gate with powder in bags, was adopted, and carried out successfully, at the cost of 182 killed and wounded. Two years and a half later the Afghan outbreak against the British occupation found Ghazni garrisoned by a Bengal regiment of sepoys, but neither repaired nor provisioned. They held out under great hardships from the 16th of December 1841 to the 6th of March 1842, when they surrendered. In the autumn of the same year General Nott, advancing from Kandahar upon Kabul, reoccupied Ghazni, destroyed the defences of the castle and part of the town, and carried away the famous gates of Somnath.


    Additional Info found on the web (including reference books):

    Category: Ghaznavid Empire

    History of Greater Iran
    Empires of Persia · Kings of Persia
    Pre-modern
    Before Islam
    BCE
    Zayandeh Rud civilization prehistoric–?
    Sialk civilization 7500–1000
    Jiroft civilization (Aratta) 3000–?
    Proto-Elamite civilization 3200–2800
    Bactria-Margiana Complex 2200–1700
    Elamite dynasties 2800–550
    Kingdom of Mannai 10th–7th cent.
    Median Empire 728–550
    Achaemenid Empire 550–330
    Seleucid Empire 330–150
    Greco-Bactrian Kingdom 250-125
    Parthian Empire 248–CE 224
    CE
    Kushan Empire 30–275
    Sassanid Empire 224–651
    Hephthalite Empire 425–557
    Kabul-Shahi dynasty 565–670

    After Islamic Conquest
    Patriarchal Caliphate 637–651
    Umayyad Caliphate 661–750
    Abbasid Caliphate 750–1258
    Tahirid dynasty 821–873
    Alavid dynasty 864–928
    Saffarid dynasty 861–1003
    Samanid dynasty 875–999
    Ziyarid dynasty 928–1043
    Buyid Dynasty 934–1055
    Ghaznavid Empire 963–1187
    Ghori dynasty 1149–1212
    Seljuk Empire 1037–1194
    Khwarezmid dynasty 1077–1231
    Ilkhanate 1256–1353
    Muzaffarid dynasty 1314–1393
    Chupanid dyansty 1337–1357
    Jalayerid dynasty 1339–1432
    Timurid Empire 1370–1506
    Qara Qoyunlu Turcomans 1407–1468
    Aq Qoyunlu Turcomans 1378–1508
    Safavid Empire 1501–1722*
    Mughal Empire 1526–1857
    Hotaki Ghilzai dynasty 1722–1729
    Afsharid dynasty 1736–1802
    * or 1736


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This box: view • talk • edit
    History of South Asia

    History of India
    Stone Age 70,000–3300 BC
    · Mehrgarh Culture · 7000–3300 BC
    Indus Valley Civilization 3300–1700 BC
    Late Harappan Culture 1700–1300 BC
    Vedic Period 1500–500 BC
    · Iron Age Kingdoms · 1200–700 BC
    Maha Janapadas 700–300 BC
    Magadha Kingdom 1700 BC–AD 550
    · Maurya Empire · 321–184 BC
    Middle Kingdoms 230 BC–AD 1279
    · Satavahana Empire · 230 BC–AD 199
    · Kushan Empire · 60–240
    · Gupta Empire · 240–550
    · Pala Empire · 750–1174
    · Chola Empire · 848–1279
    Islamic Sultanates 1206–1596
    · Delhi Sultanate · 1206–1526
    · Deccan Sultanates · 1490–1596
    Hoysala Empire 1040–1346
    Kakatiya Empire 1083–1323
    Vijayanagara Empire 1336–1565
    Mughal Empire 1526–1707
    Maratha Empire 1674–1818
    Colonial Era 1757–1947
    Modern States 1947 onwards
    State histories
    Bangladesh · Bhutan · Republic of India
    Maldives · Nepal · Pakistan · Sri Lanka
    Regional histories
    Assam · Bengal · Pakistani Regions
    Punjab · Sindh · South India · Tibet
    Specialised histories
    Dynasties · Economy · Indology · Language · Literature
    Maritime · Military · Science and Technology · Timeline
    This box: view • talk • edit
    The Ghaznavid Empire (Persian: سلسله غزنویان‎ ) was a Khorāṣānian Sunni Muslim state[1] that existed from 962 to 1187, centered in what is now Afghanistan, and ruled much of Persia, Transoxania, and the northern parts of the Indian subcontinent. It was created and ruled by a highly Persianized family of mamluk Turkic origin.

    The dynasty was founded by Alp Tigin, a military general of the Ṣāmānī sultans, with the city Ghazna as its capital. After the Battle of Dandanaqan in 1039, it lost its western territories to the Seljuqs and moved its capital to Lahore, thus shifting its rule from Khorāṣān to the Panjāb.

    Contents
    1 Rise to power
    2 Domination
    2.1 Legacy
    2.2 The Ghaznavid Dynasty
    3 See also
    4 Literature
    5 References
    6 External links



    Ghaznavids Rise to power Rise to power
    Two military families arose from the Turkic Slave-Guards of the Samanids — the Simjurids and Ghaznavids — who ultimately proved disastrous to the Samanids. The Simjurids received an appanage in the Kuhestan (Quhestan) region of southern Khorasan. Alp Tigin founded the Ghaznavid fortunes when he established himself at Ghazna (modern Ghazni, Afghanistan) in 962. He and Abu al-Hasan Simjuri, as Samanid generals, competed with each other for the governorship of Khorasan and control of the Samanid empire by placing on the throne emirs they could dominate when Abdul Malik I of Samanid died in 961. Abu al-Hasan died in 961, but when the Samanid Emir Abdul Malik I, died in 961 CE it created a succession crisis between Abdul Malik's brothers. A court party instigated by men of the scribal class—civilian ministers as contrasted with Turkic generals—rejected Alp Tigin's candidate for the Samanid throne. Mansur I was installed, and Alp Tigin prudently retired to his fief of Ghazna. The Simjurids enjoyed control of Khorasan south of the Oxus but were hard-pressed by a third great Iranian dynasty, the Buwayhids, and were unable to survive the collapse of the Samanids and the rise of the Ghaznavids.

    The struggles of the Turkic slave generals for mastery of the throne with the help of shifting allegiance from the court's ministerial leaders both demonstrated and accelerated the Samanid decline. Samanid weakness attracted into Transoxania the Qarluq Turks, who had recently converted to Islam. They occupied Bukhara in 992 to establish in Transoxania the Qarakhanid, or Ilek Khanid, dynasty. Alp Tigin had been succeeded at Ghazna by Sebüktigin (died 997). Sebüktigin's son Mahmud made an agreement with the Qarakhanids whereby the Oxus was recognized as their mutual boundary. .


    Ghaznavids Domination Domination
    Saboktekin made himself lord of nearly all the present territory of Afghanistan and of the Punjab by conquest of Samanid and Shahi lands. In 997, Mahmud, the son of Sebük Tigin, succeeded his father upon his death, and with him Ghazni and the Ghaznavid dynasty have become perpetually associated. He completed the conquest of Samanid, Shahi lands, the Ismaili Kingdom of Multan, Sindh as well as some Buwayhid territory. Under him all accounts was the golden age and the height of the Ghaznevid Empire. Mahmud carried out seventeen expeditions through northern India establishing his control and setting up tributary states. His raids also resulted in the looting of a great deal of plunder. From the borders of Kurdistan to Samarkand, from the Caspian Sea to the Yamuna, he established his authority.

    The wealth brought back from the Indian expeditions to Ghazni was enormous, and contemporary historians (e.g. Abolfazl Beyhaghi, Ferdowsi) give glowing descriptions of the magnificence of the capital, as well as of the conquerors munificent support of literature. Mahmud died in (1030), and his son Mas'ud was unable to control the conquered lands and lost the Battle of Dandanaqan in (1040). Even though there was some revival of importance under Ibrahim (1059-1099), the empire never reached anything like the same splendour and power. It was soon overshadowed by the Seljuqs of Iran.

    Sultan Bahram Shah was the last Ghaznavid King ruling Ghazna, the first and main Ghaznavid capital. Ala'uddin Ghori, a Ghorid King, conquered the city of Ghazni in 1151, for the revenge of his brother's death. He razed all the city, and burned it for 7 days. Ghaznavid power in northern India continued until the conquest of Lahore in 1187.

    After their loss of power, the remaining Ghaznavids stayed in Ghazni, where – over the centuries – a new tribe evolved, namely the Ghilzai tribe, first documented in the 16th century. The historical sources are quite unclear but it is assumed that it was the Nasher, the former Ghaznavid Khans, who ruled the Ghilzai Kharoti tribe for ten centuries. They became prominent again between the 16th and 17th centuries, when the Khans founded several dynasties, among them the Hotaki Dynasty, ruling Persia and the (Lodi) Moghul Dynasty in Delhi.


    Ghaznavids Legacy
    The Ghaznevid Empire was the first significant Islamic empire in Asia and marked a break of political control from the Abassids and Baghdad. The Ghaznavid empire grew to cover much of present-day Iran, Afghanistan, and northwest India and Pakistan, and the Ghaznavids are generally credited with launching Islam into Hindu-dominated India. In addition to the wealth accumulated through raiding Indian cities, and exacting tribute from Indian Rajas the Ghaznavids also benefited from their position as an intermediary along the trade routes between China and the Mediterranean. They were however unable to hold power for long and by 1040 the Seljuks had taken over their Persian domains and a century later the Ghurids took over their remaining sub-continental lands.


    Ghaznavids The Ghaznavid Dynasty
    Alptigin (963-977)
    Abu Mansur Sebük Tigin Khan (977-997)
    Ismail (997-998)
    Yamin ud-Dawlah Mahmud (998-1030)
    Jalal ud-Dawlah Mohammed (1030-1031)
    Shihab ud-Dawlah Mas'ud I (1031–1041)
    Jalal ud-Dawlah Mohammed (second time) (1041)
    Shihab ud-Dawlah Maw'dud (1041-1050)
    Mas'ud II (1050)
    Baha ud-Dawlah Ali (1050)
    Izz ud-Dawlah Abd ul-Rashid (1053)
    Qiwam ud-Dawlah Toğrül (Tughril) (1053)
    Jamal ud-Dawlah Farrukhzad (1053-1059)
    Zahir ud-Dalah Ibrahim (1059-1099)
    Ala ud-Dawlah Mas'ud III (1099-1115)
    Kemal ud-Dawlah Shirzad (1115)
    Sultan ud-Dawlah Arslan Shah (1115-11180
    Yamin ud-Dawlah Bahram Shah (1118-1152)
    Mu'izz ud-Dawlah Khusrau Shah (1152-1160)
    Taj ud-Dawlah Khusrau Malik (1160-1187)
    Nasher Khans, later Ghilzai Khans (from the 16th century)

    Ghaznavids See also
    Mahmud of Ghazni
    History of Afghanistan
    History of Iran
    History of India
    History of Pakistan
    Islamic Empires in India

    Ghaznavids Literature
    C.E. Bosworth: The Ghaznavids. Edinburgh, 1963

    Ghaznavids References
    C.E. Bosworth, "Ghaznavids", in Encyclopaedia Iranica, Online Edition 2006, (LINK)
    islamicarchitecture.org about the Ghaznavid Dynasty
    M. Ismail Marcinkowski, Persian Historiography and Geography: Bertold Spuler on Major Works Produced in Iran, the Caucasus, Central Asia, India and Early Ottoman Turkey, with a foreword by Professor Clifford Edmund Bosworth, member of the British Academy, Singapore: Pustaka Nasional, 2003, ISBN 9971-77-488-7.


    Ghaznavids External links External links
    Columbia Encyclopedia (Sixth Edition) - Mahmud of Ghazna
    Encylopaedia Britannica (Online Edition) - Mahmud
    Encyclopaedia Britannica (Online Edition) - Ghaznavid Dynasty
    Encyclopaedia Britannica (Online Edition) - Ghaznavids and Ghurids
    Mahmud Ghaznavi's 17 invasions of India






    This article incorporates text from the Encyclopĉdia Britannica Eleventh Edition, a publication now in the public domain.

    Categories: our article database articles incorporating text from the 1911 Encyclopĉdia Britannica | Ghaznavid Empire | 963 establishments | 1187 disestablishments | Empires and kingdoms of India | History of the Turkic people
    Last edited by Ahiga; April 27, 2007 at 02:56 AM.
    Former Historian & Dev Member for Broken Crescent Mod
    Dual-Major BA in Medieval History / Political Science, Adelphi University Aug. 1989
    Member of the World History Association
    Member of the Medieval Academy of America
    Member of the Richard III Society
    Member of the Society for the Study of the Crusades and Latin East
    If you like my post, please +Rep...if you dislike my post, please +REP me twice

  6. #6

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    I'll post Ghaznavid army information I've found soon. In the mean time, this is the summary:

    A general 'lack' of armor in comparison to their western neighbors. It specifically mentions no armor for the horses, possibly for any horses. It does mention that the mace was very prized, and that ghulams came from Indian as well as Central Asian/Turkish background.

    What I imagine would be a suitable roster for them would be summarized in this. They have strong offensive light infantry (Afghan levies), no offensive heavy infantry (Only heavy infantry are foot-bowmen with sidearm, shield and bow, and possibly heavy spearmen), strong light cavalry sources (Turkish tribes + afghans), sufficient medium cavalry (Ghulams), absolutely no superheavy and very limited if existent heavy cavalry, war elephants.

    Weapons are generally the same as any other, however a real focus on the mace. I did not feature Daylami but the odds are likely they used them. I suppose even if they have a limited amount of heavy infantry their weakness can be in an absolute lack of heavy cavalry, with only elephants to assume that role.

    Also with their abundance of Ghulams as the mainstay of their cavalry, compared to the balance of Ghulam and Faris with Near Eastern Muslim Armies, perhaps they can benefit from higher discipline and moral (If we conclude that was a trait of Slave-warriors) at the cost of inferior armor or shock-abilities that Abbasid and Transoxanian cavalry have.

    http://www.fanaticus.org/DBA/armies/dba115.html

    Is an early example


    Anyone know the history on those Ghazni infantry in MTW? Were Ghaznavid's notorious for religious militant volunteers?
    Last edited by Ahiga; April 02, 2007 at 04:48 AM.

  7. #7

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    Hope this helps. I found a hand-drawn map o Ghazi (current day) that denotes where some important city locations are, historically speaking, such as where minuretes are to be found as well as directional info on things like the walls of the "old city" and the citidel inside it:

    GHAZNI, capital of Ghazni Province, is an important market town, particularly famed for the embroidered sheepskin coats (pusteen) currently enjoying great popularity throughout Europe and the United States. The rapidly expanding modern city lies at the foot of an impressive ruined citadel beside the Ghazni River.
    Ghazni
    A thriving Buddhist center in the 7th century A.D., Ghazni fiercely resisted the advance of an Arab army in 683 A.D. Its resistance was so famed that Yaqub Saffari from Seistan made a special example of Ghazni when he ranged the country conquering in the name of Islam; Ghazni was razed to the ground in 869.
    But Yaqub’s own brother rebuilt the town which later became the dazzling capital of an empire encompassing much of northern India, Persia and Central Asia; the Ghaznavid Empire endured from 994–1160 A.D. Many iconoclastic campaigns into India were launched from this city in the hills. The Ghaznavids took Islam to India and returned with fabulous riches taken from both prince and temple god. Contemporary visitors and residents at Ghazni write with wonder of the ornateness of the buildings, the great libraries, the sumptuousness of the court ceremonies and of the wealth of precious objects owned by Ghazni’s citizens. This glorious city was also razed, in 1151 by the Ghorid Alauddin. Again it flourished only to be permanently devastated, this time by Genghis Khan in 1221. Still, Ghazni’s strategic position, both economically and militarily, assured its revival, albeit without its dazzling former grandeur. Through the centuries the city figures prominently as the all important key to the possession of Kabul.
    Last edited by Simetrical; July 03, 2007 at 05:06 PM.
    Former Historian & Dev Member for Broken Crescent Mod
    Dual-Major BA in Medieval History / Political Science, Adelphi University Aug. 1989
    Member of the World History Association
    Member of the Medieval Academy of America
    Member of the Richard III Society
    Member of the Society for the Study of the Crusades and Latin East
    If you like my post, please +Rep...if you dislike my post, please +REP me twice

  8. #8
    Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    13,967

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    I'm gonna make Ghazni a castle instead of city. What do you think?

    Here are some paintings of Ghazni by some British during the colonial times:











    The actual citadel I think has been largely destroyed, probably during the Afghan Civil war (or the Brit-Afghan war). From the picture below pretty it pretty much look destroyed.


  9. #9

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    Quote Originally Posted by mirage41 View Post
    I'm gonna make Ghazni a castle instead of city. What do you think?
    Works for me, but can you set it so it also is eligible to have a Merchants' Guild? As I recall it was important place in the "Silk Road".
    Former Historian & Dev Member for Broken Crescent Mod
    Dual-Major BA in Medieval History / Political Science, Adelphi University Aug. 1989
    Member of the World History Association
    Member of the Medieval Academy of America
    Member of the Richard III Society
    Member of the Society for the Study of the Crusades and Latin East
    If you like my post, please +Rep...if you dislike my post, please +REP me twice

  10. #10
    Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    13,967

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    Here's another pic Ghazni, depicting the British seige in 1839.



    It seems it was a pretty damn massive citadel. Never realised this.




    Quote Originally Posted by CelticPagan View Post
    Works for me, but can you set it so it also is eligible to have a Merchants' Guild? As I recall it was important place in the "Silk Road".
    Probably.
    Last edited by Miraj; April 05, 2007 at 04:59 PM.

  11. #11

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    the big job was done here

    casle instead of city it is interesting
    Through your intercession I hope to see the light of Thy son and the light of everlasting ages !

  12. #12

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    Okay, the following is from "The Discovery of India" by Jawaharlal Nehru:

    712 AD - Arabs take the provinve of Sind, and stop any further expansions.
    1000 AD - Mahmud begins raids into India. These raids were described by Alberuni: "the Hindus became like the atoms of dust scattered in all directions and like a tale of old in the mouths of people. Their scattered remains cherish of course the most inveterate aversion towards all Muslims."
    - however, Mahmud was unable to capture the province of Kashmir.
    - Mahmud also lost a battle to a Rajput chief in the desert. About this loss the following was written in the Tarikh-i-Sorath:
    "Shah Mahmud took to his heels in dismay and saved his life, but many of his followers of both sexes were captured... Turk, Afghan, and Mughal female prisoners, if they happened to be virgins, were accepted as wives by the Indian soldiers... The bowels of the others, however, were cleaned by means of emetics and purgatives, and thereafter the captives were married to men of similar rank. Low females were joined to low men. Respectable men were compelled to shave off their beards, and were enrolled among the Shekhavat and the Wadhet tribes of the Rajputs; whilst the lower kinds were allotted to the castes of Kolis, Khantas, Babrias and Mers." We are told [by the book mind you] to pay attention to the fact that the invaders were blended into the Rajput society.
    - Mahmud was described to be more of a warrior than a religious man. Maybe this could be reflected by the traits he starts out with? also, Mahmud exploited the name of religion to bring the people into war.
    - Mahmud took artisans and builders from India to Ghanzi as he wanted Ghanzi to be the greatest and most beautiful city of all.
    - Islam existed in india since before this time [along with Zoroastrians, Jews, Buddhists etc. so perhaps the Indian cities shouldn't be 100% Hindu? along with islam and pagan?] However, Mahmud and his people forced Islam onto the people, causing unrest and unhappiness.

    cheers
    - indian_boy
    CHECK ME OUT ON YOUTUBE
    for Total War Tips, Tricks and Tutorials!


  13. #13
    Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    13,967

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    Excellent research. I'll discuss this more after exams (26th).

    Keep up the good work!

  14. #14

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    You know, I read something interesting that the gun's arrival basically tipped the balance in favor of the Afghan hillmen away from the horse-and-armor wearing plainsmen. I'm pretty sure it falls out of our date, but I dunno, I love the idea of an Afghan skirmisher with matchlock. I think it'll depend on how much we feature gunpowder (I imagine we will have cannons, although nerfed in their effectiveness vs walls. We should have handcannons, but matchlocks come about in the 1400s), and how much historical reality we are willing to sacrifice in favor of gameplay.

    I just think it would be pretty cool to have a resurgence of Ghaznavid/Ghorid strength over the Mongols. Basically rewarding these factions if they can survive into the 1300s by giving them inexpensive and adept gunpowder units to help fight against the plentiful horse of Mongol and Timurid. It'll really depend on in if we feature gunpowder beyond the handcannon though in any future updates. And of course these would not be the only guys with it.
    Last edited by Ahiga; April 22, 2007 at 09:24 PM.

  15. #15
    Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    13,967

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    The Afghan gunpowder guerilla type deal sounds interesting... but lets keep it medieval for the time being.

    Remember the quote "He who defends everything defends nothing".. likewise trying to do to much well end up us achieving nothing. This game is at the core about medieval sword, maces, archers, horses etc. Lets keep the focus tight.

  16. #16
    Sanskrit_Bandit's Avatar Wielki Kniaź Wiślański
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Canada/Polska
    Posts
    896

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni


  17. #17
    Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    13,967

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    Quote Originally Posted by polak966 View Post
    Thanks!

    From Polak's link:

    Cavalry


    Light Horses


    Elephants


    Bows


    Warband


    Auxillia


    Psiloi (?)
    Last edited by Miraj; April 23, 2007 at 10:09 PM.

  18. #18

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    Ignore the Unit suggestions I put up. This is in response to what you said in the Khwarezm topic, Mirage.

    Point 1: Ghazni & Daylami - Daylami should not be a strong feature in the Ghaznavid roster. There is not historical, ethnic or regional basis for this. Ghazni is in central afghanistan. Daylam is in northern Iran. I generally don't agree with the daylami being part of the ghaznavid roster at all.
    Remember Mirage. The dominions of the Templars were all the way in France. Outremer is in the levant. By the logic you've mentioned, templars should not be recruitable at all in a KoJ city, but instead be relied upon as scripted shipments from Europe. Ditto for the Nubian troops of the Abbasids. It's part of accepting the inaccuracies a game will provide that we have to deal with things they did not have to in History. We'll have to accept that the AOR can apply history and reality only so far, and that it has fallacies. If you want to prevent as many as these as you can, it will get to complex and too irritating for the player.

    We can accept that Ghulams are bought and shipped to another faction's location, such as egypt, or Baghdad. We can accept that Nubians are bought and brought to Baghdad. We can accept that Crusader Orders are entirely 'built' in Europe and 'shipped' to Europe. I think we should accept that the daylami could be built and trained outside of Iran by factions which historically used them, else it will be far too much of a headache. I've seen information which points to the Ghaznavid's doing so. Surprisingly, and remember that I wanted them with the Khwarezm at first, but I have not seen research so far say that the Khwarezm's used them.

    I won't post my researcher for now that explains why. I apologize about jumping ahead and producing the unit rosters while you were studying. This made you and the community too not a part of it (Although the community could have participated as I urged them to), so that it basically took you out of the equation, making this a mod of Skinner and researcher, instead of skinner, Developer, researcher, and community.

    When we reach these guys, we can start from the ground up, dealing with their units and their units only, working on the daylami separate and deciding which daylami will get brought into the Ghaznavids.

    I'll post research in the mean time, and I will not make any unit suggestions or try to make the roster. Simply provide information I have.
    Last edited by Ahiga; April 27, 2007 at 09:49 PM.

  19. #19

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    Khorasani light spearmen



    Khorasani heavy spearmen



    "I don't want to sit around Windsor because ermm .. I just generally don't like England that much" - Prince Harry, 3rd in Line for the British Thrown



    For King or Country - The English civil wars.

  20. #20

    Default Re: FACTION: The Sultanate of Ghazni

    Daylami assault infantry



    "I don't want to sit around Windsor because ermm .. I just generally don't like England that much" - Prince Harry, 3rd in Line for the British Thrown



    For King or Country - The English civil wars.

Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •