[OLD] The Challenge Thread

[Leonidas The Lion]

Well mostly ancient times but i also do modern.
As for the question i have no idea.

[removeduser_426582376423734]

Lets be specific. Lets say, Punic Wars (either one)? And for some examples for questions, "Could Hannibal have taken over Rome after Cannae?", or "Was it necessary to take over the southern part of Italy after Cannae?". You get the idea.

[Leonidas The Lion]

Ah ok lets say WW2 Stalingrad.
Question:Could the Germans have avoided defeat if they had not been encircled?

This good.

[removeduser_426582376423734]

Sorry to say modern history is not my forte, unless its early-WW1.

[Leonidas The Lion]

Ok how about ancient history.
Say:
Would Alexander Conquer India if had not fallen ill and died?
If Napoleon won at Waterloo what would happen?

This better.

[removeduser_426582376423734]

The Alexander one, because its a question with a yes or no, not one with hundreds of possiblities.

[Leonidas The Lion]

Ok so how does this happen?

"I hereby challenge you to a debate."

LOL

[Professor420]

Now that Manstein has returned I would like a response to my original challenge. En guarde.

[enoch]

Enoch, no offense, but you have no idea what you're talking about. I've wanted to say this several times before (your posts are predictably similar), but it is especially warranted in this case. You should elaborate next time, though it would no doubt mean digging the hole deeper.

to elaborate....

[Denny Crane!]

to elaborate....

Elaborate on the question

[enoch]

I want him to discuss with me the merits of the post he lost it on without cause or putting forward arguments

me = western world towards totalitarianism and reasons why

him = ?

[Denny Crane!]

I challenge anyone to figure out what the heck enoch actually wants to debate?

Failing the unlikely take up of that challenge I challenge someone so far above my weight class its like an ant wanting to move the biggest rubber plant in the world, this goes beyond David and Goliath, this is wanda and the colossus territory, little dog challenging the big dog as it were.

I challenge Garb to a debate on the psychotic effects of Tetrahydrocannabinol in relation to psychosis and specifically scizophrenia although a debate on the harmful effects on short term psychosis with reference to long term would be acceptable. I think a debate on the legal issues is relatively worthless since among educated people a consensus seems fairly easy to reach though it is an acceptable arguement if the opposition truly believes in the harmful effects, and the benefits of prohibition.

[-Eclipse-]

I challenge any opponent on the merits of religion in modern culture and whether or not a)secularism and b)outright ban of religion is a rational course of action in any developed state. I will take the side against religion.

[Pra]

That's why I smack these kids back to reality
And how it be in actuality
With ready to battle MCs lets skip the ****in' formailties
We spark it in any club or meat market
Sweet artists don't come on the block they become street targets
If you want it I got it, come get it I'm with it
Your career will be shorter than a midget
And the world will know who did it

I challenge anyone to any battle.

[Valentin the II]

I challange InquisitorGalloglass on a debate about religion.

[Banned]

Anybody in a mood to get soiled fight?

[Enemy of the State]

What would you be interested in, Annaeus?

[Banned]

Anything related to philosophy. However, I give you the right to choose the topic.

[The10thLegion]

ill challenge somebody on was the "byzantine empire" roman or byzantine. Im on the roman side

[Centurion-Lucius-Vorenus]

I'd like to challenge eric on his claim that Wellington is Better then Napoleon.