Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 62

Thread: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    NaptownKnight's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    8,558

    Default Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    I certainly do, but I cant quite place why. RTR is far superior to anything ME2 has to offer, and the graphics are not even that inferior, except the campaighn map looks alot better in ME 2. The only thing that ME 2 has thats better than Rome is it's improved Diplomacy interface, and with some of the mods available, superior campiaghn map Ai. Nyways if you guys think Rome is better or worse tell me why or why not.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    Without a doubt. So much better - especially cavalry charges. I like it simpler, less realistic tbh. Medieval tries too hard.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    No contest - RTR wipes the floor with ME2 as its a real porker - crap and frankly I dont see any superior graphics bar the different shields.

  4. #4
    Mithradates's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    2,077

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    RTW has more diverse factions, BI and MED2 are like east vs. west, they are boring...

  5. #5
    Elric von Rabenfels's Avatar The Devil Inside
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brit living in Germany
    Posts
    3,774

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    Nope. I consider that MTW2 is better than Rome. I played every TW from Shogun and Med2 just gives me a better feeling than Rome. You don´t have to agree with me, but I think Medieval 2 is better. Especially with the mods.
    - What can change the nature of a man?

  6. #6
    Cyrus the Virus's Avatar Vicarius Provinciae
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Crackfordshire
    Posts
    10,884

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    Thats why I play Rome now, its simply the better choice atm.
    Last edited by Cyrus the Virus; February 15, 2007 at 08:49 AM.

    "And the Heavens Shall Tremble"
    Resistance is futile™


    "ehn sewr traih-sluyrds-lairareh"

  7. #7

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    rome

  8. #8

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    In Medieval 2, the Cavalry is too strong, the AI too stupid, and there are too many Horse-Archers. Thats, why I am playing Rome.
    "The only thing we learn from history is that we never learn from history."
    CPU: Intel Core i7-4790K 4,0 Ghz LGA 1150 | GPU: MSI AMD Radeon R9 280X 3GB DRR5 | RAM: G.Skill TridentX PC3-19200U CL10 16 GB | SSD: Samsung 840 EVO Basic 500 GB SATA 6 GB/s | PSU: be quiet! Pure Power L8 CM 630 Watt | MBU: ASRock Fatal1ty Z97 Killer LGA1150 ATX
    Steam | Origin | Battlelog | Pics
    Austrian Company GC

  9. #9
    NaptownKnight's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    8,558

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    It does seem like there are multitudes of problems in MED2. The pathfinding in cities is horrendus, It's definetly a serious downgrade from Rome ( Although the cities in Me2 are also more complex). But wow, I just reloaded Rome and got RTR two nights ago and I've been hooked. It has to be one of the best games I have ever played. I just think the overall setting of Rome is better. Imo the time of the rise of Rome is far more interesting than Medieval times.

  10. #10
    Odovacar's Avatar I am with Europe!
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Arrabona (Győr, Hungary)
    Posts
    6,120

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    Animations for RTW are far worser than for MTW2. See the realistic animations of cavalrymen.
    RTW cavalrymen sit on horses like stones...Vannila RTW is very unhistorical, but campaign map is better than MTW2.
    Overall graphic is way beter for MTW2 (no suprise) but the gameplay is not really.
    IN PATROCINIVM SVB HORSEARCHER
    quis enim dubitat quin multis iam saeculis, ex quo vires illius ad Romanorum nomen accesserint, Italia quidem sit gentium domina gloriae vetustate sed Pannonia virtute

    Sorry Armenia, for the rascals who lead us.


  11. #11
    NaptownKnight's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    8,558

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    Quote Originally Posted by Odovacar View Post
    Animations for RTW are far worser than for MTW2. See the realistic animations of cavalrymen.
    RTW cavalrymen sit on horses like stones...Vannila RTW is very unhistorical, but campaign map is better than MTW2.
    Overall graphic is way beter for MTW2 (no suprise) but the gameplay is not really.
    ME2 isnt exactly the most historically acurate either, I mean where is Aragon? They were major players in the Iberian penninsula and the mediteranian, so why are they represented by rebels. The animations in rome are bad, but atleast there are no broken ones like medievals 2 hander. Hopefully the people who made RTR will make Medieval Total Realism, cuase that may be the mod Ive been waiting for to bring me back to Medieval.

  12. #12
    Plutarch's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Vegas!
    Posts
    798

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    Quote Originally Posted by NaptownKnight View Post
    Hopefully the people who made RTR will make Medieval Total Realism, cuase that may be the mod Ive been waiting for to bring me back to Medieval.
    I think id get fired from my job for missing too much work if they did a Medieval 2 Total Realism. There were things i liked in both MTW2 and RTW, each has their own advantage and disadvantage. I still havent gotten so bored with MTW2 to go back to Rome yet tho. Im not saying its better, but i waited for a long time for MTW2 to come out, im going to ride it out lol

  13. #13
    Adrian's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Dacia
    Posts
    1,846

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    rome is better it has a more immersive gameplay the animations in rome are older but they are not broken like in mtw2 i would like to see rtw with mtw2 graphics that would be a blast
    .........


  14. #14
    Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY, US
    Posts
    6,521

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    They're both absolutely pathetic.

  15. #15

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    When i began to play MTWII it was refreshing but it soon turned into pure boredom...like stated by other members the cavalry is too strong and the gameplay is somewhat troublesome. I could say that the graphics are a must in this game but it lacks various things....Rome otherwise i installed yesterday again e was completely hooked again..(i´d prefer the basic surroundings) and the fabulous cavalry charge! So my vote goes to RTW!

  16. #16

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    I like Medieval more than I like Rome. But that's probably because I was young when i first played RTW and always screwed up and played it for only 2 months. Then, when M2TW was released, I was already a 14 year old thinkshimselfaphilosofer and kicked ass of every thing that got in my way and I'm an excelent economist. I usually am democratic in M2TW, but I'm going to try a fascist Empire now. I'm making a copy of the Nazi Reich. Oh, and i prefer the Medieval Ages rather than Rome.

    @Raven Darkwing:

    Satanic Avatar, huh?
    "God forbid that I should go to any Heaven where there are no horses" - R.B. Cunningham-Graham

  17. #17

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    For now . . . . . . . I would have to say Rome. I bought MTWII on the day it was released and i felt very let down. I got a 3.2ghz 2gb ram 7800gtx so i could run it adequately enough. After playing Rome for so long it felt really rough around the edges. Plus, i like the Roman period better (particularly the late roman period when everything starts falling apart LOL).

    I know its blasphemy, but i still havent completed the vanilla RTW campaign (halfway through as we speak) and playing as the WRE in BI is such an amazing challenge, i have plenty to keep me going.

    I'm hoping more patches will sort out MTWII.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    Medieval 2's graphics own and there's very good detail on the campaign map unlike Rome it's too easy play. Medieval 2's difficulty is quite challenging which makes it very fun.
    I came, I saw, I owned.

  19. #19
    spirit_of_rob's Avatar The force is my ally
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Blackpool UK
    Posts
    2,622

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    welll rome i played non step for many months even before i tried mods etc etc medieval 2? i played an english campaign finished in november and i havent touched it since so.....
    Former Skinner/Modeller for EB Former Skinner/Modeller for Hegemonia


    Patrician Opifex under the patronage of Basileos Leandros I and patron of the Opifex Tone

  20. #20
    Titus's Avatar Ordinarius
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    739

    Default Re: Do U think Rome is better than ME2

    I would say I really enjoyed Rome better then Medieval 2.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •