Not exactly. To visit any of the 123 countries that are members of the ICC risks his arrest. Its a public humilation.
...is doing what he has always done/ wanted to do. Heis seeking to gain more time to commit more mass massacres, deepen the genocide, destroy the entire Gaza Strip, and push its Palestinians out of the territory.
Read, The Origins of Netanyahu's “All-Systems Assault” on Israeli—New Yorker ...
And, CASE STUDY: ISRAEL- Global State of Democracy 2023 Report
A brief except,
This deserves a more in-depth comment.A few months ago (last October) , the Foreign Affairs magazine published an article calling for the US government to join the ICC, entitled "It's Time for America to Join the International Criminal Court - Holding Putin to Account Will Require Offering the Court More Than Just Intelligence". I suspect it was the hypocritical euphoria of the moment (The ICC is on the side of the good guys!) that inspired the Foreign Affairs to write this article:(…) The proposed reforms are particularly significant amid broader democratic declines and previous attempts by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government to undermine democratic institutions (Oren and Waxman 2022;Eisen, Patel and Smith 2023). Since Netanyahu took office in 2009 Israel has witnessed a notable shift towards nationalist and illiberal policies. The 2018 Nation-State Law, defining Israel as the ‘nation-state of the Jewish people’ (Al Jazeera 2018), promoted settlement expansion, which critics saw as marginalizing non-Jewish minorities and institutionalizing Palestinian
oppression (Beaumont 2018). Netanyahu has adopted several strategies to aggrandize executive power, including targeting independent institutions such as the judiciary, police, media, and civil society organizations (Chotiner 2023). He has also manipulated societal divisions, as seen in his contentious plan to deport African migrants and his support for right-wing nationalism, which eroded democratic institutions and exacerbated religious and racial inequalities within Israel (Taylor 2018; Al Jazeera 2023c; Grossman 2023). Under Netanyahu’s leadership, settlement expansion received government
approval, consolidating Israeli control and making the establishment of a viable Palestinian state increasingly challenging (Bar-Siman-Tov 2010; Al Jazeera 2023c; United Nations 2023). Although Israel has never officially annexed most of the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), persistent demands for increased authority over these lands has been a salient issue in Israeli politics (Tessler 1986). Netanyahu’s 2019 pledge (Times of Israel 2019) to extend Israeli sovereignty over the OPT indicated a shift towards a permanent presence and departure from previous government support for a two-state solution (Farsakh 2011). This aligned him with right-wing and nationalist factions favouring West Bank incorporation into Israel. Moreover, his administration introduced policies and legislative proposals aimed at annexing
Palestinian land, which sought to further integrate Jewish settlers into Israel and limit the prospects for a Palestinian state or full citizenship (Landau 2020) (...)
In fact, once the ICC was created, the US passed the ASPA that prohibited providing any support to the ICC. That same year, however, an amendment was passed to the law allowing exceptions for when the US could assist the international courts and tribunals as long as they targeted designated US "enemies" or other foreign nationals, prioritizing its own foreign policy goals over wider international criminal justice efforts.This July, U.S. President Joe Biden ordered his government to begin sharing information with the International Criminal Court’s investigation into atrocities committed in Ukraine. It was a surprising decision: the United States is not a member of the ICC, and for months the U.S. Department of Defense resisted the idea of assisting this ICC investigation, concerned about treading on a slippery slope that could one day lead to prosecutions of U.S. military and intelligence personnel. But both the White House and Congress appear to have set the Pentagon’s concerns aside.
But actually, it's even worse than that: they are as quick to support international justice as they are to sanction it, whenever it suits them. I wonder why David Sheffer, the American diplomat who headed the U.S. delegation that negotiated the Rome Statute on behalf of the Clinton presidency wrote these words: “The Trump Executive Order against the ICC will go down in history as a shameful act of fear and retreat from the rule of law”.
Well, that’s exactly what is happening now.
--
Last edit,fresh news.
Right now, there is a broad consensus that there must be peace.
Joint Statement from the Leaders of the United States, Argentina, Austria, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Colombia, Denmark, France, Germany, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Spain, Thailand, and the United Kingdom on Gaza-WHITE HOUSE
Great news, but Israel is not ready to "move forward with" and will never accept a lasting peace or a two-state solution. It is only interested in an exchange of prisoners.Hamas says it will deal positively with any ceasefire deal based on the war’s total halt....as outlined by President Biden on May 31, 2024. There is no time to lose. We call on Hamas to close this agreement, that Israel is ready to move forward with, and begin the process of releasing our citizens. We note that this agreement would lead to an immediate ceasefire and rehabilitation of Gaza together with security assurances for Israelis, and Palestinians, and opportunities for a more enduring long-term peace and a two-state solution. At this decisive moment, we call on the leaders of Israel as well as Hamas to make whatever final compromises are necessary to close this deal.
Spain applies to join South Africa's case at top UN court accusing Israel of genocide.