That’s not how evidence works, but even if one adopts this standard, the concession these treatments and procedures lack supporting evidence would mean the prior claims about the latter being disinformation because these procedures are medically necessary and life saving are false.
the M/H outcomes are considered statistically "substantive"..
https://epi.washington.edu/news/gend...sgender-youth/
Why is the NHS unqualified? I don’t consider your alleged experience with receiving certain treatments or procedures to be a representative sample, never mind a requisite qualification.
It's ,more qualification than you have. The NHS is a body directly answerable to a body politic.
That’s a restriction. Proposed restrictions include not only limiting puberty blockers, hormones and surgery to controlled research settings, but also limiting social transitioning to adolescents who meet certain criteria. That constitutes an indictment of the entire approach of gender affirming care, let alone providing sex reassignment procedures and treatments to minors, which is anyone under 18 in the US.
A restriction, suggest its restricted, that there is a restriction, no-one is de jure, restricted, anymore than them already being Px.. How exactly do they propose too stop someone form wearing wat they want? Are we talking about stripping children?
Even by the UK standard of 16, the proposed restrictions based on commissioned research would render this assertion moot. Children, that is, people below the age of majority in the US or UK, receive sex reassignment procedures and treatments, including puberty blockers, with increasing frequency. The NHS is seeking to restrict this practice, as are several US states.