
Originally Posted by
Erik
Not according to these stats:
ALL CRIME - British Crime Survey data

Source:
http://www.crimestatistics.org.uk/output/Page54.asp
No, the reason is because you choose to be very capitalistic.
Other rich capitalistic countries like the US and Ireland also score very low on quality of life.
Socialistic countries score much higher because they have less poverty which is a much bigger factor in these "quality of life" stats than how many millionaires you have.
Those crime figures you have shown are out of context, have a look and see how many crimes have been report, and the fact every government now records crime differently so they can spin the figures. That applies to both Conservative and Labour governments, although Labour are better at it.
As for crime numbers,

Originally Posted by
BBC
The risk of becoming a victim of crime in England and Wales is rising for the first time since 1995, figures suggest.
The British Crime Survey, regarded as the most reliable measure of crime by the Home Office, said the risk had risen one percentage point to 24.3%.
In a separate measure, the number of crimes reported to police had fallen 3% in the third quarter of 2006 compared with the same period the previous year.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6297715.stm
As for the quality of life being determined by our “capitalist” ways is nothing more then a cliché with no substance. For example if that were true why doesn’t it affect the America quality of life? In that same survey they finished in the top five of countries to live and they are the most capitalist country in the world. The fact of the matter is quality of life is determined by other factors, such as where you life physically (most other countries of the earth have much better whether then we do), so saying our quality of life is done to fact we have a capitalistic economy (which is wrong in the first place) is just nonsense.

Originally Posted by
Cassandra123
Actually I think the Chancellor's budget has been running at a surpluss for several years now, including the most recent one.
Rubbish. The Chancellor had to raise indirect taxes to fill a black hole of his own doing because he didn’t get his sums right on economic growth.

Originally Posted by
CBI
CBI: Budget black hole a priority
The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) insists the chancellor must cut back on public sector spending "or jeopardise future growth".
In its recommendations for his pre-Budget report, the CBI warns that the alternative to spending cuts - tax rises for businesses and individuals - would "hit the economy" at the time of economic slowdown.
"A £10 billion structural deficit has opened up in the public finances, which needs to be tackled early in the next fiscal cycle," said deputy director general John Cridland.
http://www.politics.co.uk/issueofthe...371$367046.htm

Originally Posted by
the black prince
but the general assumptions made about the criminal justice system in this thread merely hihlight the number of people who seem to base their fact finding exercises on what they read in the daily mail. most of which is just plain and simply wrong.
the Home Office is a total mess, no one can deny it, but whose fault is it? Whose fault is it that Prisons are overcrowded? government policy that sends more and more people to jail, and for longer.
as of 2005 we jail more people on inderminate and life sentences than the rest of the EU15 put together, we imprison a ratio of our population second only to the USA in the west, and the only reason the USA rates higher is because of their federal drugs laws and mandatory sentencing policies.
Sorry but this is wrong as well. Labour were told were told years ago that we would need 100,000 more prison places were going to be needed by 2010. Rather then act on this report labour ignored it out of hand and now we are suffering the consequences. But your right on one thing John Reid can not be made a scapegoat for the failings of his office, after year’s abuse by previous idiots.

Originally Posted by
Times
The report is illustrated by a series of annotated charts. One suggests that the prison population is expected to rise by 25% in the next five years from 80,000 to more than 100,000. This far exceeds the number of prison places the government has planned for, suggesting that ministers will have to come up with radical solutions to cope with the expected crime wave.