Re: [Amendment] Ensuring non disclosure compliance in the curia
Originally Posted by
PointOfViewGun
I'm confused. Is this an unnecessary paperwork as you suggest? Or is this a required clarification since there is no binding instruction as you also suggest?
As AFK points out as well: this has never been an issue in the curia before - but as you can see from the 'justification' quotes adding binding wording to the constitution has become a necessity as the consul rejects any ND obligations for the curia to the point of allowing release of private information (see 'violation' quotes) as nothing binding can be found in the constitution.
Hence the 'until recently' introduction.
Last edited by Gigantus; April 10, 2022 at 12:17 PM.