Laetus
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
I made no changes in the AI configuration file. The AI in the campaign is the one which is set by default.Originally Posted by Macaras
These 3-5 scoutatoi are measured by the game as stronger than an army of Serbian troops. My assumption is that Serbian units (which are all levies in early game) strength in auto-calc battles is grossly underestimated compared to that of the Romans, even when they sit in a stone castle.
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
Good morning,The first thing I wanted to share is my thanks to the mod's developers.I haven't played the mod in a year and admits that the newest twst versions 0.98 bring huge changes to the gameplay. The campaign is challenging, lots of new buildings and scripts.It's great to play. However, I would like to ask about the hotseat campaigns.Is it adapted to the game? With the ''Sword Brothers'', we noticed during the game that the very hard level only appears with the comunicat to the first player - the starting player, another one is normal difficulty. Armies do not desert with debt above 2500. AI makes strange wars like Pisa - the Papal State in 5th turn.Perhaps it is possible to quickly make some changes to make the hotseat like a campaign for one game?
History and gameplay!
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
Hi Grathus,
I admit having paid no attention to the HotSeat. I don't know how does it play out, coding was not adjusted.
Mercenaries should desert with any debt higher than 500, but normal units will not be disbanded. The armies also do not desert in debt.
Indeed a strange war Pisa vs the Papal state - maybe @Macaras would try pinpoint why.
I don't think quick changes are possible, but I don't know to what extend they are needed. Most scrips should work as intended, I'd guess.
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
Thank you for Your response. I'd like to add that I tested the campaign a bit and after running the map and bin file cleaner before, the AI is better and harder to beat in the hotseat campaign. However, Pisa continues to attack the Papal State as I break my campaigns all over again, but this is only hotseat campaing problem.
PS: In the single player campaign: I'm amazed at the challenge level of playing Rus. I feel very grateful for the opportunity to play a refined mod.Thank You!
Last edited by Grathus; April 11, 2022 at 08:02 AM.
Senator
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
I run a test and see that Rome rebelled ?Indeed a strange war Pisa vs the Papal state - maybe @Macaras would try pinpoint why.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
So maybe somewhere there the problem appears- Pisa takes over Rome from the rebels, but then Rome rebels against Pisa, automatically joins papal state and the war starts?
I am not sure if this may be caused by some of the scripts, or changes descr_campaign? I don't think its related to ai, I didn't change anything regarding the papal states recently..
I noticed that playing hotseat a different faction then Papal States- the Rome is ok. So maybe there is a faction that raises the rebelliousness of the human player cities, that was raised recently and this is the cause of problems with Papal State?
Last edited by Macaras; April 11, 2022 at 10:28 AM.
History and gameplay!
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
For Rus, I've created not one, but two special regional building lines (Lavra, Chude), five unique buildings (Zoloti Vorota, Hanseatic Kontor in Novgorod, three cathedrals), I've added a few rebel armies at the beginning, and adjusted things like fertility of provinces, or initial set of buildings. And first and foremost: the dynamic integration of provinces system, eg.:In the single player campaign: I'm amazed at the challenge level of playing Rus. I feel very grateful for the opportunity to play a refined mod.
It would be great if you'd post a few pics from your campaing. A save would also be helpful for us to analyse how the mods behaves.Code:;============================================================================================================ ;------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Polotsk Settlement Situation monitor_event SettlementTurnStart SettlementName Polotsk set_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 0 log --- (.A.) Polotsk Turmoil Points (for the Player) ------------------------------------------------ if I_EventCounter is_the_player == 1 and I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm > 4 if I_EventCounter FL_policy_protector < 1 ; base unrest value - if no FL policy protector and I_EventCounter DifficultyLevel > 2 ; Hard or Very Hard difficulty and I_EventCounter faction_size_small == 0 ; inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 2 ; 2 for factions 4-9 settlements if I_EventCounter faction_size_medium < 1 ; inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 2 ; 4 for factions 10-19 settlements if I_EventCounter faction_size_large < 1 ; inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 2 ; 6 for factions 20+ settlements end_if end_if end_if if I_EventCounter FL_is_crowned_ruler < 1 ; FL is UNcrowned - it will be true for the most of the factions for a long time inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 4 ; 4 for a home province if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 390 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 290 ; many provinces have initial 200, so they will have +2 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 190 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 90 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 30 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 ; +5 for a new conquered province end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 480 ; province not yet integrated into our realm: 0-9 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 320 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 160 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 90 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 50 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 25 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 16 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 12 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 8 ; right after capture: 9 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if if I_EventCounter FL_policy_greedy_ruler > 0 ; people hate greedy FL and I_EventCounter DifficultyLevel == 4 ; Very Hard difficulty and I_EventCounter faction_size_small == 0 ; doesn't matter for small factions - everybody knows him inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 3 ; 3+3 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 300 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 200 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 100 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 end_if end_if end_if end_if if I_EventCounter FL_weak_on_the_throne > 0 ; weak FL (low authority or weak usurper) and I_EventCounter faction_size_small == 0 ; doesn't matter for small factions inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 5 ; 5+5 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 440 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 340 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 240 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 140 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 40 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 1 end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if if I_EventCounter FL_player_is_new_this_turn > 0 ; (one-off) shock for the kingdom: FL died and I_EventCounter faction_size_small == 0 ; doesn't matter for small factions inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 10 ; 10+10 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 450 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 2 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 350 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 2 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 250 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 2 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 150 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 2 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 50 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 2 end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if if I_EventCounter player_aggressivity > 6 ; (conquest of 1 settlement adds 3-18 aggressivity pts., usually 12) inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 4 if I_EventCounter player_aggressivity > 12 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 8 if I_EventCounter player_aggressivity > 24 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 16 ; cumulative, so levels of turmoi points: 4-12-28 end_if end_if end_if end_if log --- (.B.) Polotsk Turmoil Points (for AI) --------------------------------------------------- if I_EventCounter is_the_player == 0 set_event_counter Polotsk_is_owned_by_AI 1 set_event_counter Polotsk_is_owned_by_player 0 if I_EventCounter faction_turn_kievan_rus == 0 and I_EventCounter faction_turn_russia == 0 and I_EventCounter faction_turn_poland == 0 and I_EventCounter faction_turn_lithuania == 0 and I_EventCounter faction_size_small == 0 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 20 end_if if I_EventCounter FL_weak_on_the_throne > 0 inc_counter Polotsk_turmoil_points 10 end_if end_if log --- (.C.) Polotsk Turmoil Points Translated Into Unrest -------------------------------------- if I_CompareCounter Polotsk_turmoil_points > 5 add_settlement_turmoil Polotsk 1 if I_CompareCounter Polotsk_turmoil_points > 10 add_settlement_turmoil Polotsk 2 if I_CompareCounter Polotsk_turmoil_points > 15 add_settlement_turmoil Polotsk 3 if I_CompareCounter Polotsk_turmoil_points > 20 add_settlement_turmoil Polotsk 4 if I_CompareCounter Polotsk_turmoil_points > 25 add_settlement_turmoil Polotsk 5 if I_CompareCounter Polotsk_turmoil_points > 30 add_settlement_turmoil Polotsk 6 if I_CompareCounter Polotsk_turmoil_points > 35 add_settlement_turmoil Polotsk 7 if I_CompareCounter Polotsk_turmoil_points > 40 add_settlement_turmoil Polotsk 8 if I_CompareCounter Polotsk_turmoil_points > 45 add_settlement_turmoil Polotsk 9 if I_CompareCounter Polotsk_turmoil_points > 50 add_settlement_turmoil Polotsk 10 if I_CompareCounter Polotsk_turmoil_points > 55 add_settlement_turmoil Polotsk 11 if I_CompareCounter Polotsk_turmoil_points > 60 add_settlement_turmoil Polotsk 12 end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if end_if log --- (.D.) Polotsk Integration Impact on Religious Change Speed -------------------------------- set_owner_founding_conversion_rate Polotsk 0.005 ; Religious Change Speed: 0.005 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 500 and I_EventCounter FL_policy_strictly_religious < 1 ; this policy nullifies the non-integration effect set_owner_founding_conversion_rate Polotsk 0.004 ; Religious Change Speed: 0.004 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 400 set_owner_founding_conversion_rate Polotsk 0.003 ; Religious Change Speed: 0.003 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 300 set_owner_founding_conversion_rate Polotsk 0.002 ; Religious Change Speed: 0.002 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 200 set_owner_founding_conversion_rate Polotsk 0.001 ; Religious Change Speed: 0.001 end_if end_if end_if end_if log --- (.E.) Polotsk Integration Process ------------------------------------------------------ if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 560 if I_EventCounter FL_weak_on_the_throne == 0 ; natural integration process but not with a Usurper (thus not during a civil war either) inc_event_counter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm 1 end_if if I_EventCounter FL_is_crowned_ruler == 1 ; if the owner's faction FL has the crown inc_event_counter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm 1 ; integration is faster end_if if I_EventCounter FL_policy_thinks_of_his_people == 1 ; if FL pursues a conducive policy inc_event_counter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm 1 ; integration is faster end_if if I_EventCounter faction_turn_poland > 0 ; this faction and I_EventCounter poland7_golden_age_player > 0 ; has special circumstances and I_EventCounter FL_weak_on_the_throne == 0 inc_event_counter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm 1 ; that allow faster integration end_if if I_EventCounter faction_turn_russia > 0 ; this province is a core province of this faction and I_EventCounter FL_weak_on_the_throne == 0 and I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 500 set_event_counter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm 500 ; already partly integrated end_if if I_EventCounter faction_turn_kievan_rus > 0 ; this province is a core province of this faction and I_EventCounter FL_weak_on_the_throne == 0 and I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 200 set_event_counter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm 200 ; already partly integrated end_if if I_EventCounter faction_turn_lithuania > 0 ; this province is a core province of this faction and I_EventCounter FL_weak_on_the_throne == 0 and I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 200 set_event_counter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm 200 ; already partly integrated end_if end_if log --- (.F.) Polotsk Infos & Counters for the Player ---------------------------------------- if I_EventCounter is_the_player == 1 set_event_counter Polotsk_is_owned_by_player 1 set_event_counter Polotsk_is_owned_by_AI 0 set_event_counter FL_player_is_new_this_turn 0 if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm > 5 and I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 7 historic_event SETTLEMENT_UNREST_NORMAL_RULES_POLOTSK end_if if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm > 197 and I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 199 historic_event SETTLEMENT_UNREST_INTEGRATED_POLOTSK end_if if I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm > 487 and I_EventCounter Polotsk_turns_in_our_realm < 489 historic_event SETTLEMENT_UNREST_INTEGRATED_POLOTSK end_if end_if end_monitor
Last edited by Jurand of Cracow; April 11, 2022 at 01:59 PM.
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
Thank you for your replies, gentlemen!
First I would like to refer to the hotseat campaign.
I checked the behavior of AI and Pisa's attack on the Papal State is not due to the rebellion of Rome. Pisa just blocked the Papal Port(6th turn).
This happens when I choose Egypt to play, when it is not there, it is ok.
However, when Hungary is chosen to play, Venice attacks HRE with the general himself (3rd turn). In this case, it is the same that if Hungary is not elected, such an incident does not occur.
Choosing a hotseat campaign has to somehow influence AI decisions.
As for the campaign (single player) Rus, it is early game, but there are some incredibly interesting things on the map. A large selection of new buildings is really happy . It looks like AI is playing very well
Below is a link with my save game.
By the way, I wanted to report that during the Battle of Chernihiv sige battle, there is always an error and throws it to the desktop.
Thanks again for your replies.
save game:
http://files.fm/f/b97874c2p
History and gameplay!
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
Hi Grathus,
thanks for the save, we'll have a look with interests.
Yeah, perhaps @Macaras should review the mechanisms making a faction blocking a port. There may lie a solution. @Macaras - maybe you'd consult @Lustianio, he's an expert in this matters, he once offered us to introduce his script for naval raids he had prepared for the EBII.
Map - additionally, for the SSHIP 097-8 the resources were screened and improved as well.
Chernihiv - if you read / watch the news, you see that Chernihiv is an utterly touch nut to cracks and the Russian Army has just failed to conquer it. They experienced exactly the same: any attack proved to be an error and they were thrown back to their starting positions. Perhaps the First Tank Brigade of the Ukrainian Army is there also in our mod? These guys are cyborgs, battleworth a corps of the Russian army.
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
I'm honestly shocked how much more prone to crashing the mod is compared to EB2 or even EB1, despite both of these being vastly more ambitious total conversion projects. Is there no way that the source of crashes could be discovered by referencing things that EB 2 did not change, but SSHIP had, if any of them actually exist?
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
Hi Jurand of Cracow,
Now I understand my mistake. The Russians, having a modern army, were repelled by First Tank Brigade of Ukraine Army.
I tried to take the city by chewing on axes and spears...
Foolish Me!
History and gameplay!
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
I experience no crashes whatsoever... I've also had heard about a few player also having seen one or two crashes in 100 turns. It seems it's quite different from what was happened a year ago. I'd assume the problem is not in the mod, but in the settings / programs working in the background / other pecularities of your system.
Domesticus
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
1
I indeed tried 2 times to execute this battle of Chernigov and the game crashes after some time... when the camera moves towards the city.
Here are some shots before the CTD:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Here is also an extract of the 2 logs after the crashes:
Log 1
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
On the 2nd log there seems to be a bug on the palisade side. Bad coding ?
Log 2
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
2
I also notice a difference between the unit icon of the eastern spearmen and that of the previous version of the mod.
Actual version
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Previous version
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
3
I also note - but this absence is also present in the previous version - that the rebel units below have neither information nor unit card.
No unit card, no info for rebels eastern spearmen
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
No info for rebels Junior militia
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Last edited by kostic; April 12, 2022 at 01:06 PM.
History and gameplay!
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
ad 1 - well, that's a problem. I have no expertise in this part of the code, saddly...
ad 2 - this is because this unit has been stripped of mercenary_attribute and uses icons from the faction's folder, not mercs.
ad 3 - same here, the problem is: the slave faction doesn't have those icon and pic (I wonder if the model is there? It's your business, @kostic :-)
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
@Kostic
ad 1: can you send your save file so I try it? You're on the version that is in moddb right?
What is strange is that in the second log the game is looking for some events pics in the Europa Barbarorum folder
ad 3: I'm a bit rusty, but I think the pics needs to be copied to the slave unit card folder
Belovèse's Toolbox: export text files to spreadsheet, detailed unit stats
Stainless Steel Historical Improvement Project (SSHIP) team member.
Mini-mods: diplomacy and relation/reputation - detailled unit stats
Domesticus
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
@jurand : For point 2, your explanation surprises me. Indeed, on the previous version, the "smolensk infantry" (Eastern Spearmen) unit no longer has the mercenary attribute. For kyiv, Novgorod and Poland, the icons have all 3 changed with the new version. I don't really mind but it's like you changed the "ui/units" folder.
For point 3, I can correct it myself indeed.
@Belovèse : The backup to be tested is in the message from Grathus.
Domesticus
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
Ok sship developers, looking at some features in the new version 0.98 of sship mod I have found some bugs/issues or things to improve, I also tell you some proposals that when you have time it would be possible to make them:
-MOORS
I have seen the new "Alcazar" building and the truth is that it is great and historic to have it in these Iberian lands, in addition to the fact that the Muslims in Spain built many because of the frequent disputes or "razzias" between Christians and Moors.
-I have realized that they still do not have the text descriptions done, for the Alcazar of Tunis there is no image (a blank photo comes out), and I think that for the Moors it would be good to recruit an infantry unit and a cavalry unit in this military building such as "Berber spearmen" and "Berber light cavalry".
-Andalusian troops cannot be recruited in Andalusian cities, I have only seen the andalusian spearmen, I have not seen the andalusian archers (I don't know if they have been eliminated) although a unit called "Andalusian militia" should be created with crossbows, shields and swords, the Andalusian units should be an AOR unit for all Andalusia (southern Spain) and that can also be recruited in the cities, not only in the castles.
These units should replace the "andah militia" of the Moors at least in Andalusia. This would make the Moors have a more unique unit roster made up of Berbers, Andalusians and few troops of Arab origin. Differentiate yourself from the rest of the Muslim factions and not have the generic armies of "andath militia"
-In the settlement of Valencia you can recruit basque archers, this is NOT historical. Basque archers should only be recruited in the Pamplona region and at most in neighboring Burgos and Zaragoza.
-FATIMIES(EGYPT)
It is the same case as the Moors in terms of their regional units, the black African troops are not available to recruit them, perhaps it is due to the elimination of the old building chain (mercenary barracks), where in Cairo and other settlements such as the most South of Egypt you could recruit black african troops (sudanese warriors, african spearmen, african javalinmen, african archers). These units make the Egyptian unit roster more unique just as the Andalusian and Berber troops make the Moorish unit roster more unique.
-I have observed the same with the Abbasids and Selyuks in their unit roster but with the Persian units.
-ENGLAND AND SICILY
I have noticed that you have changed the city of York for a castle, why is this? Supposedly York was one of the most important cities of that time along with London...
- I have already seen that the Norman units can be recruited both in Sicily and in England, it is a good choice, I commented long ago that they should be regional units focused on the south of Sicily, Normandy and southern England.
- Another point would be that the Welsh Archers were available at the beginning of the game in Wales together with the welsh spearmen(regional unit), therefore it would be a valuable enclave to conquer to obtain these valuable archers, in another post I gave information that already in the s.XII and long before there was evidence of the use of the longbow especially in Wales.
-For the English faction it would be nice to create a unique wonder, perhaps the Tower of London, or as the last level of gallows chain ( gallows- prison- prison complex- Tower of London), this unique building was very important in the Middle Ages for the Englishmen and a symbol of royal power.
-SEVERAL PROPOSALS FOR NEW VERSION OF SSHIP
-Add religion shia islamic( egypt) and jew religion with Jewish communities( new building chain) if is possible
-Italian colonies (regional buildings for Pisa, Venice and maybe Sicilians) and important settlements that were related to the Italian commercial colonies such as the famous Genoese, Pisan and Venetian neighborhoods in Constantinople
-Byzantine recruitment, in general, has improved a lot, especially that now the Varangian guard and cataphracts can be recruited in Constantinople, making it more unique, what happens is that I cannot see where mercenary units such as latinikon, vardatorai can be recruited
-Unique universities (Jurand said some time ago that he wanted to have unique universities like Bologna, Paris or Constantinople)
-Single ports (Venice, Constantinople...) It would be the same as the single university proposal but for the most important ports and factions with a naval tradition in the Middle Ages (Byzantines, Venetians, Cairo?, Danes?)
-Slave markets now I have seen that they can be built by all the Muslim factions anywhere, it is a good choice although I do not understand a part of the description, you need them to recruit ghulams and mamluks???
- With the commercial caravans (building) some time ago I made a proposal about adding more units to its different levels. First level- 1 unit of bedouin infantry / Second level- 2 units bedouin infantry and 1 bedouin cavalry/ Third level- 2 Bedouin infantry, 2 Bedouin cavalry, 1 Bedouin camel riders. This would be more eye-catching in-game to have these units in these locations and historical because these trade caravans were usually guarded by locals or Bedouin.
- and well the last thing is that as I said, when I have more free time I will continue with my improvements in descr units and descriptions of historical units so that you can include it in the new versions and help you with this part
* This is a small review of some factions that I have been able to see briefly playing the new version, when I have more time I will play campaigns again and I will keep you informed.
I hope not to be tedious and help you as much as possible to improve, I know that my English is not the best and sometimes my vocabulary can be confused, but all these things are proposals and questions.
I usually love the new version with all the new things it brings and its historical balance!!!
THE MORE YOU SWEAT NOW,
THE LESS YOU BLEED IN BATTLE!!!
Sign the petition to remove hardcoded limits for M2TW
Senator
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
Erzurum ( Qaliqala) - Is raised in the air and meditates
Flying city
Last edited by Khevsur; April 16, 2022 at 11:14 AM.
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
Yes! That has been my experience too. The walls are up in the air, so I can’t position archers on them. Impossible to use siege towers and ladders too. Lol
Senator
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
The battles are unbalanced. Spearmens very easily escape from the battlefield. Georgian spearmens with a wall of shields and small teams were very dangerous for enemy cavalry. The positive side of Georgian warriors has always been close combat, best possession of spear and sword. Georgian warriors was a good infantry . but it was difficult to fight the nomadic cavalry. I think this will improve in the future. Now the game is in test mode
Domesticus
Re: SSHIP_098 April 7th 2022 - for testing
eii sship developers I would like you to give me your opinion regarding my previous remark about the missing units (Egyptians) and the other things I mentioned. I am currently reading and subscribing to some historical magazines that can be of great help for the mod.
THE MORE YOU SWEAT NOW,
THE LESS YOU BLEED IN BATTLE!!!
Sign the petition to remove hardcoded limits for M2TW
Posting Permissions
