Re: Any Total war with good historical battles?
In Rome II, they are a bit meh. Some of them, like the battle of Pydna are essentially a random custom battle with no relevance to what actually happened. Rome I's are much better and some of them offer a unique challenge. On the other hand, Medieval II's are more boring and generic, in my opinion. The two games supposedly excelling in historical battles are Alexander and Napoleon. They are part of a wider narrative of recreating the military careers of these two legendary commanders, where winning one battle unlocks the rest. They feel a bit absurd sometimes: Trafalgar is a mess and for some mysterious reason, in the battle of Lodi, your most important objective is to kill Beaulieu. In reality, Beaulieu survived the battle and capturing him was not part of Napoleon's strategy. Anyway, despite these shortcomings, I would say that the historical battles in Rome I, Alexander and Napoleon are the funniest in the series.