Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 47 of 47

Thread: Give a reason why you prefer Rome I over Rome II

  1. #41

    Default Re: Give a reason why you prefer Rome I over Rome II

    Quote Originally Posted by Cleitus the Pink View Post
    RomeII units and battles are spreadsheeted trash. The building isn't fun. The map models are awful. The AI sucks and a cherry on the top is that they've reduced modding potential in several ways.
    Truly, terrible map models. Don't know how this game is even playable. Why would they ever release such an ugly game? /s


  2. #42

    Default Re: Give a reason why you prefer Rome I over Rome II

    I don't know about Rome I, but I will say that I much prefer the battles in Medieval II because I can use the slow motion toggle to make them play at a very slow and comfortable speed, and with sound. In Rome 2, even using the slow motion, which is not adjustable as it is in Medieval 2, the battles are much to fast for me, especially the cavalry charges, and I just can't keep up with the tremendous pace of the click fest. Furthermore, in Rome 2 if one toggles slow motion, the proper sounds effects disappear.

    BTW, could someone please tell me if Rome I has a way to slow battles down in increments of .1 normal speed as Medieval 2 does? If so, I will buy it and start playing the new Roma Surrectom/RTR mod.
    Last edited by Kilgore Trout; December 21, 2021 at 01:13 PM.
    Roland searched the continent for the man who'd done him in
    He found him in Mombasa in a barroom drinking gin
    Roland aimed his Thompson gun. He didn't say a word
    But he blew Van Owen's body from there to Johannesburg
    - Warren Zevon - Roland the Headless Thompson Gunner - 1978

  3. #43

    Default Re: Give a reason why you prefer Rome I over Rome II

    One simple, yet very important factor for me;
    I can actually play Rome 1/Remastered on my PC. I don't have the specs to handle 2.

  4. #44

    Default Re: Give a reason why you prefer Rome I over Rome II

    Quote Originally Posted by FromolWyoming View Post
    One simple, yet very important factor for me;
    I can actually play Rome 1/Remastered on my PC. I don't have the specs to handle 2.
    Rome 2 has lower requirements than Remastered.

    ROME 2 / ATILLA RECOMMENDED:
    OS: Windows 7*
    Processor: 2nd Generation Intel Core i5
    Memory: 4 GB RAM
    Graphics: 2 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti or AMD Radeon HD 5870
    DirectX: Version 11
    Storage: 35 GB available space
    Additional Notes: PC integrated graphics chipsets require 64 bit Windows, e.g. Intel HD series.

    Rome Remastered RECOMMENDED:
    OS: Windows 10 64-bit (version 20H2)
    Processor: Intel Core i5-4570 | Ryzen 5 1600
    Memory: 8 GB RAM
    Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 4GB | AMD Radeon R9 290 4GB
    DirectX: Version 11
    Storage: 45 GB available space
    Additional Notes:
    * Estimated performance on High settings at 1080p : 60 FPS
    * Framerate may drop in large-scale, graphics-intensive battles

  5. #45

    Default Re: Give a reason why you prefer Rome I over Rome II

    Because of the map!

  6. #46

    Default Re: Give a reason why you prefer Rome I over Rome II

    Simply best Total War Game for me but not in Original the Mods make it to my first place

  7. #47

    Default Re: Give a reason why you prefer Rome I over Rome II

    Rome 1 is better because things like this are released 20 years later: https://github.com/MuaazH/RTW_SCRIPT...e/main/scripts

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •