Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 35

Thread: Siege Towers VS Ladders

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Siege Towers VS Ladders

    Is it just me or do siege towers just suck when compared to ladders...I mean whenever I'm sieged the seige tower always burns down (as opposed to the ram) and further more, when the units board in ladders, they have more chance of doing more damage to my men on the walls than the ones on the siege tower...This is totally the opposite of RTW...

  2. #2

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    guys with ladders get pwnd by missiles

  3. #3

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    Yeah, ladder do get destroyed by missle fire as parvus said, but all you have to do to fend off a ladder attack is position any unit except maybe crossbow militia in 3 deep ranks where the ladders are going up and they will kill whatever is coming over the walls because they pretty much come one by one, units using ladders also seem to rout extremely easily. Only problem I have with seige towers is when they start to burn when 3/4's of my unit is climbing up it and boom I'm left with 12 dismounted knights out of 60. When siege towers do get to walls and you get men out your hitting the walls with like 6 men to start, they can usually get a good base and hold thier own for a bit, if your trying to take a well defended wall with seige towers I'd say you use three to cut the enemy forces into peics and destroy them.

  4. #4
    CtrlAltDe1337's Avatar Praepositus
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    5,424

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    This is what I've found to be the most effective use of ladders/towers.



    Send the ladder to the portion of wall farthest from the gate and the tower to the closest section. The ladder will arive first and distract the defenders while you troops in the tower pour into their flank and capture the gatehouse.

  5. #5
    Soulghast's Avatar RAWR!
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    3,912

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    Quote Originally Posted by Crucifix View Post
    This is what I've found to be the most effective use of ladders/towers.



    Send the ladder to the portion of wall farthest from the gate and the tower to the closest section. The ladder will arive first and distract the defenders while you troops in the tower pour into their flank and capture the gatehouse.
    This could work, but the problem of the guy is that his siege towers are getting burnt when nearing the walls.

    If it goes to the gatehouse, which has 2 towers, I don't think that there is much chance that the tower won't get burnt down.

    And I think that ladders cannot be used in some higher level walls, correct me if I'm wrong.
    Ex-Curator
    Under the Patronage of Perikles
    Patron of Desperado † and Astaroth


    R.I.P Calvin

  6. #6

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    true, but i kno that ladders can be used against lvl 3 citadel walls.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    ok...maybe I've been positioning the siege towers in the incorrect places...but they still do burn a lot more quickly than i would imagine...

  8. #8

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    Quote Originally Posted by Ippius View Post
    Is it just me or do siege towers just suck when compared to ladders...I mean whenever I'm sieged the seige tower always burns down (as opposed to the ram) and further more, when the units board in ladders, they have more chance of doing more damage to my men on the walls than the ones on the siege tower...This is totally the opposite of RTW...
    Lies, its just like RTW.
    its quite cool that CA didnt change much of the Battle gameplay

  9. #9

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    i dont get it when my troops see a ladder i want them just to push the ladder off lool make all thos trooop climbing fall of into a horable death

  10. #10

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    Crucifix - Ive usually found that when following for your tactic my siege tower attracts all the missile fire (since its closest to the double towers of the gatehouse) and eventually burns up, thereby acting as a decoy so that most of my ladder guys get up and over unscathed.
    Of course the guys stuck with the burning siege tower usually take alot of casualties either retreating or running over to the ladders..

  11. #11

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    My tactic is get the ram first, then I send one siege tower between two ladders to get some protection (depens if i'm lucky). Then, bam!! Rest is history.

  12. #12
    CtrlAltDe1337's Avatar Praepositus
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    5,424

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    Quote Originally Posted by Strategos83 View Post
    Crucifix - Ive usually found that when following for your tactic my siege tower attracts all the missile fire (since its closest to the double towers of the gatehouse) and eventually burns up, thereby acting as a decoy so that most of my ladder guys get up and over unscathed.
    Of course the guys stuck with the burning siege tower usually take alot of casualties either retreating or running over to the ladders..
    If you do that on both sides they wont be able to burn both towers unless they have balista towers.

  13. #13
    Gorrrrrn's Avatar Citizen
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    here
    Posts
    5,546

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    ladders can't be used against huge city walls.

    huge city walls plus cannon / ballista towers and good quality infantry should repel the most determined attackers.

    provided you have a bunch of cavalry handy to destroy any artillery that gets within range of the walls.

    I found that dismounted crusader knights were very effective at repelling egyptian spear militia. stand them 3 deep where the siege engine / ladders (if applicable) are placed and they see the attackers off with hardly any casualties. Defended jerusalem with a danish force, 1100 attackers and defenders. losses: attackers 1100, defenders 17.

    attacking - well use artillery to open up the walls. (protected - i have known the AI to sally forth to attack bombards etc). have ram and siege tower in front of main gate but run infantry and archers with ladders (if you can) round the sides in the hope of finding an unprotected wall.

    when attacking: If in doubt - sit it out!

  14. #14
    Friend
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Beautiful America
    Posts
    8,626

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    I dont fight castle battles. If I get besieged, I autoresolve the defence cause I know I will beat the AI in any situation, since they always get stuck somewhere. And when I am attacking, I always wait the siege out, and autoresolve when they sally. I used to play siege battles, but they are stupid. The AI will have a "garrison" of 2 cavalry units or somesuch, so I send my ladder up, take the gate, run 4 units of spears into the townsquare, and the battle is over.


    Retired moderator of TWC
    | Under the patronage of Atterdag

  15. #15

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    gunpowder units r soooooo useful...

  16. #16

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    I think ladders can be used against citadel walls BUT can't be used against Huge City walls. Doesn't matter though, basilisks pwn any wall.

  17. #17

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    I don't use siege towers or battering rams at all.

    I use spies to open the gates, ladders and catapults (later cannons).

    First, the catapults will drive all archers off the walls (or shoot them off).

    Then, my infantry goes through the gate and wall breaches, while my archers use the ladders to get on the walls and fire their arrows from above at the enemys fighting my infantry.
    "Nach hinten wegtreten, Marsch, Marsch. In fünf Minuten will ich Sie telefonisch nicht mehr erreichen können." - StUffz H.

    "Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea, Mr. Creedy, and ideas are bulletproof." - V for Vendetta

  18. #18
    Commander_Vimes's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    UK,Surrey
    Posts
    1,712

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    i agree with long john just blow the wall apart from the distance with catapults or something or justuse a spy by the way how come when you do a sally battle the enemy bother coming in ever at all??

  19. #19

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    With the tougher defenses, it really pays to bring along some siege engines, thank god. In RTW, siege engines were pretty darn pointless. Anyways, I see ladders as the thing to bring along to overwhelm a tiny garrison. Siege towers are for when you're willing to build for 2-3 turns to ensure you completely overwhelm a tougher defense. Building 1-2 towers and a handful of ladders doesn't work well, as the towers get burned up by arrows and the ladders get there before the towers, so your attack is disjointed. One or the other, says I.

  20. #20

    Default Re: Siege Towers VS Ladders

    its also quite necessary to get a couple of gunpowder seige units

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •