I'll make this simple.
While I'm totally ok to the automatic suspension of citizenship and curial offices following a Moderation Infraction, people still have the chance to appeal that Infraction, so I'd say that an amendment to that rule is in order, to allow the infracted citizen a week or 10 days maximum to appeal that infraction before the suspension takes place. If they don't appeal in within this time the suspension takes places and in case they appeal it after they have to wait for the appeal result.
Let's make this even simpler
As of today, if one citizen gets an infraction, they have their citizenship suspended immediately and their curial offices removed. If they don't appeal the infraction, nothing happens, but if they do, this will possibly hinder the election for the Curial office they were holding (as it happened recently) until the appeal is resolved: if positively, they will gain their status and office back immediately, otherwise they have to wait for the infraction to expire to get the status back, while the office they hold has already passed by to someone else.
My concept: if one citizen gets an infraction, they have 1 week to appeal it; if they do, any disciplinary action is suspended until it's over, if they don't, they lose the status (and the office); if they don't appeal at all, then nothing particular happens, if they instead decide to appeal it let's say 15 days later, should they win they can get back their citizenship immediately, but not the office that was already gone
well it's more complex than what it looks, but the purpose is that to avoid having a curial office not covered like it happened last time; if they appeal within 1 week, then they can keep up with their duties unless their appeal is rejected, if they don't appeal within 1 week, the office will pass over to someone else (similarly, they cannot apply for any curial position, etc).
Not very likely to happen, still it happened