Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 42 of 42

Thread: President-Elect Biden Begins Naming Appointees

  1. #41

    Default Re: President-Elect Biden Begins Naming Appointees

    Quote Originally Posted by pacifism View Post
    Okay, I’m no bureaucratic wunderkind, so there are some nuances in the civil service that I don’t fully grasp yet. It may be a somewhat different situation with a president being reelected, or a new president of the same party, but a new president of the other party entering the White House has quite a few appointments to make. President Trump had to fill about 4,000 positions, with around 1200 requiring Senate confirmation in 2016. Partly due to sheer volume, you are right that even most of the ones with a Senate confirmation do take place with relatively little fanfare.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ve-branch-jobs
    https://www.acslaw.org/federal-execu...-appointments/
    https://web.archive.org/web/20170112...appointees.php

    One thought that crossed my mind – just one, mind you – is that if the Republicans retain a clear Senate majority and if the handful of moderate ones still toe the party line, Sen. McConnell could conceivably take obstructionism to new heights next year.
    Well, there's the terminology. And yes, the terminology is kind of important. Yea, there's a lot more positions, ie, "staff", than there are "appointments". The President's staff doesn't require Senate approval. But the President's appointments do require approval.

    Case study. The President appoints the FBI Director. The Senate makes a lot of noise in this process about who they may or may not approve. But at some point the President names someone, the Senate committee interviews them and votes. The Senate votes up or down. If approved, the new FBI Director names his own staff running departments within the FBI. Free hand from both the President and the Senate.
    Last edited by Gaidin; December 19, 2020 at 01:16 PM.
    One thing is for certain: the more profoundly baffled you have been in your life, the more open your mind becomes to new ideas.
    -Neil deGrasse Tyson

    Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable. Let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.

  2. #42
    Ludicus's Avatar Comes Limitis
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    13,071

    Default Re: President-Elect Biden Begins Naming Appointees

    Quote Originally Posted by alhoon View Post
    OK, two different progressives, different opinions. But the headlines of the articles are "Honeymoon not over" and "Honeymoon over".
    And the media wonder why people finding it harder to trust them.
    The media?
    Btw, the Atlantic has hit the nail on the head on this issue,
    Stop Scapegoating Progressives - The Atlantic

    In their infinite elitism, they consider their world view to be the “legitimate” one and the others to be “radicals” and fringe. “We are centrists,” they say, “and everyone who disagrees with us is, by definition, not in the center.” How grotesquely arrogant and patronizing.
    Of course, the most infuriating part is that they are wrong — factually, empirically wrong. Dozens of polls show that, on almost every issue, the country is nearly two-thirds progressive.Misinforming Americans is what many Democrats do, too.

    In 2016, some Democrats blamed “economic anxiety” for their losses, instead of admitting that racist ideas, more than any other factor, distinguished Trump voters.
    It was politically sound for Democrats to dismiss the racist ideas of voters they hoped to win over in 2018. In 2020, they are blaming progressives, for much the same reason.
    For Trump, the misinformation started long before Election Day. For Democrats, it started two days after Election Day.

    Neither moderate nor progressive candidates generally ran on socialism or defunding the police. Republican candidates, though, commonly ran attack ads declaring that all Democrats from Biden to Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez were far-left socialists seeking to defund the police. But instead of uniting with progressives to attack Republican misinformation after the election, some moderate Democrats attacked progressives, thereby spreading Republican misinformation.

    If the main line of Republican misinformation right now is voter fraud, then the main line of Democratic misinformation is that progressive policies are unpopular. Just as Donald Trump’s claims of fraud have proved to be a self-soothing delusion, moderates’ attacks on progressives are untethered from the reality of increasing support for progressive policies.

    Progressive policies succeeded in swing states and red states during this election cycle. Florida voters passed a $15 minimum wage. Voters in Arizona, South Dakota, and Montana legalized recreational marijuana. Arizona raised taxes on the rich to fund public schools. Colorado voters instituted 12 weeks of paid family and medical leave.
    The majority of Americans and the majority of low-income Republicans favor raising the federal minimum wage to $15. The majority of respondents to an Ipsos poll this year, including 46 percent of Republicans and 72 percent of Democrats, said a $1,000-a-month “universal basic income” would make a difference in “their community in building a strong economy that gives everyone a chance to succeed.” A Fox News poll conducted the week before Election Day found that 70 percent of respondents were concerned about the effects of climate change; 77 percent said racism is a serious problem in U.S. society; 72 percent said racism in policing is a serious problem; and 67 percent said the criminal-justice system needs major changes or a complete overhaul. According to a Fox News exit poll, 70 percent of voters favored changing the health-care system to allow Americans to buy into a government-run plan. In another poll, by Climate Nexus, 59 percent of respondents supported the Green New Deal, while only 25 percent opposed it. Two out of three respondents in yet another recent poll supported some form of widespread student-loan forgiveness, including 58 percent of Republicans.

    candidates in swing districts supporting progressive policies did win.. In the House, California’s Katie Porter, Josh Harder, and Mike Levin; Pennsylvania’s Matt Cartwright and Susan Wild; Oregon’s Peter DeFazio; and Arizona’s Ann Kirkpatrick all supported Medicare for All in swing districts and prevailed.* None of the Democrats who lost their reelection bids for the House supported Medicare for All. Among the 93 co-sponsors of the Green New Deal in the House, only one lost reelection. Four co-sponsors who represent swing districts ranging from very slightly Democrat to moderately Republican won reelection.

    neither Republican misinformation nor progressive policies were universally fatal for Democrats. If it continues, though, Democratic misinformation will be fatal for Democrats.

    I expected GOP misinformation to portray moderate and progressive Democrats as anti-American extremists—which GOP operatives are doing now to the Democrats running for the U.S. Senate in Georgia.
    I didn’t expect moderate Democrats to first decry GOP misinformation and then turn around and misinform Americans about progressives. I didn’t expect moderate Democrats to contribute valiantly to the remarkable campaign to eject Trump from the White House, then follow that up with a postelection misinformation campaign that could cause a recurrence of Trumpism in the House in 2023, and of Trump himself in 2025.
    Il y a quelque chose de pire que d'avoir une âme perverse. C’est d'avoir une âme habituée
    Charles Péguy

    Every human society must justify its inequalities: reasons must be found because, without them, the whole political and social edifice is in danger of collapsing”.
    Thomas Piketty

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •