View Poll Results: Which vanilla game would you prefer?

Voters
12. You may not vote on this poll
  • Rome 2 Total War

    3 25.00%
  • Attila Total War

    9 75.00%
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Which game is overall better: Rome 2 or Attila?

  1. #1
    Incendio's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    411

    Default Which game is overall better: Rome 2 or Attila?

    Which Total War is overall a better game considering only as vanilla (no mods): Rome 2 or Attila?

  2. #2
    Daruwind's Avatar Citizen
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Prague
    Posts
    2,898

    Default Re: Which game is overall better: Rome 2 or Attila?

    Both. They are different. The same reason I play both Empire/Napoleon...

    Rome 2 has for me the proper mediterranean feeling, antique, empire building while Attila is feeling like end of world, crumbling civilization, crumbling nature..

    Attila is harder, makes a bigger challange so I voted for Attila..
    DMR: (R2) (Attila) (ToB) (Wh1/2) (3K) (Troy)

  3. #3

    Default Re: Which game is overall better: Rome 2 or Attila?

    Rome II was the worst game I have ever seen and played (only 129 hours), beatiful map, but stupid menusystem and broken experience system and idiotic regions system. But Rome II is nice for multiplayer Battles! Atilla is somewhat better than Rome II (normal unitinfocards again, no cheap cartoons), but then they decided to destroy the towers of the towns on capture, big mistake. So no multiplayer battles in Atilla, evenore because the battles are to quick, another mistake.. But seriously campaignwise (regardless of the graphic beauty) both games are total garbage, and lack any idea of AI too (like older TW games I admit).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •