There are variations in economic outcomes due to skin color. The point is self-evident.
There is no difference, you're still hating someone because of their skin color. Whether you add other reasons is fairly irrelevant.
This is nonsensical. It's not okay to hate black people because they're black period.Really now? So it's okay to hate poor black people (whilst not hating poor white people), just not black people in general? Is this your position?
Racism is not just judging, it's often times actively excluding. Affirmative action isn't "judging people" based on race, it's identifying which groups are marginalized. If you don't feel like a marginalized group, then don't consider yourself one. In the same way if you feel you are not poor, then don't take benefits.And it identifies these marginalized groups based on.. what? Oh, that's right, race. In other words: within the span of 2 lines of text you go from "judging based on race is bad" to "judging based on race is good". I'm impressed, well done. The next step, of course, is to contradict yourself within the same sentence, so I eagerly await your reply.
I don't understand your point here. I'd appreciate it if you spelled it out for me.
There is zero similarity between the arguments of Mein Kampf and affirmative action. Unless you're telling me that the superiority of the Aryan race is identical to Black scholarships on the basis of need and ability.No, racism is wrong because it uses criteria other than merit to dole out advantages. Positive racism is still racism. Positive discrimination is still discrimination. As long as race is a factor, even among 1 million others, it's racism and it needs to die. The idea that only whites can be racist or that racism only stems from whiteness is not even idiotic, it's evil. If you ever bother looking though Mein Kampf you will see almost identical arguments in favor of the germans and in excuse of antisemitism.