Why are american policymakers so hysterical as to call for the use of 'tactical nukes' in the event of war with China?
Strikes me as a lack of confidence in the fighting calibre of the rainbow recruitments.
On the contrary it appears american propaganda makes north korean propaganda look like child's play; the United States is in a permanent state of decline that would be self correcting with a Revolution and Elite overthrow and yet the masses are pacified with easy pornography (hence the rise of inceldom in american boys) and mass prostitution (OnlyFans being the most popular job for young american women). This is evidently Gibbon's moral decline of Rome.
Why would the US Elites discard a working system for their own benefit because of the racist fear of being overtaken by China? Only strontium clad thermonuclear warheads targeted at New England, Connecticut ie the wealthy homes of the US Elites, will make them a little more rational.
Happily, China's DF-series express can also target bunkers in New Zealand for those billionaires wanting to flee to remote areas.
That's a lot of wishful thinking there, the numbers don't lie- hell, the fact the your average american consumer now has to fork out more for less and less at Costco should be your on the ground proof that inflation is here and it aint stopping.
I see you avoided Macro economics in school
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-.../inflation-cpi
The annual inflation rate in the US soared to 4.2% in April of 2021 from 2.6% in March and well above market forecasts of 3.6%. It is the highest reading since September of 2008, amid a surge in demand as the economy reopens, soaring commodity prices, supply constraints. There is also a base effect weighing as the coronavirus pandemic dented economic activity bringing the inflation rate to 0.3% in April 2020. The biggest increases were recorded for gasoline (49.6% vs 22.5% in March), fuel oil (37.3% vs 20.2%) and used cars and trucks (21% vs 9.4%). Inflation also accelerated for shelter (2.1% vs 1.7%) and new vehicles (2% vs 1.5%) and rebounded for apparel (1.9% vs -2.5%), but slowed for medical care services (2.2% vs 2.7%) and food (2.4% vs 3.5%). Meanwhile, compared to March, prices rose 0.8%, the most since 2009 while monthly core consumer inflation increased 0.9%, the most since 1996. source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
If you the line number you are very much looking mostly at supply side shock particularity oil (remember the weather in Texas) and chips crating a really odd distortion in the auto market. Outside of those what I see is inflation actually getting away from the risk of deflation we have had for a while more or less not a real risk.
edit: although I do think we are clearly looking a bubble in house prices. The Fed should act on that but I doubt any economic model could really have effectively forecast one the aspects of the pandemic the Odd fact that say the top 30% of wage earners would easily slide into zoom work for a year, and thus have a huge pool of saving to blow on say a different or new house and a job that might not be so tethered to here you are anymore. Nor can I imagine anyone had chip shortages and the used car market in their Econometrics. If you want to be a Inflation doom sayer you really need say 3 months of data and granularity to see if inflation is creeping into the sectors not directly impacted by supply shock.
Hell, look at the rise of gold and cryptocurrencies these past few months, money sure as hell aint flowing into US bonds. In fact, given Bidens infrastructure plan there's going to be more money printing > inflation> declining value of USD>money printer go Brrrrrr. 70s style Stagflation is coming to the US
Minnie Chanhttps://www.scmp.com/news/china/mili...ier-plans-more
So not really kinda not liking the cost. Also of course the problem you seem to want to ignore is no decision happens in a vacuum. That kind of power projection might well simply make the US commit to rapidly building say Forrestal type CVs and and maybe handing them off to Japan or the ROK. I don't doubt China wants control of the south China sea but I really don't think it wants a global arms race that get rather expensive.
I'll let you in on a secret; no-one in the China defence watching community takes minnie chan seriously. She also said that China wouldn't build more than 3 carriers.
What does it say about MAD when US policymakers are talking about using tactical nuclear weapons?So you really do not understand how MAD works than right where did you get a secondary education at
It reveals a stark lack of confidence in conventional US fighting abilities and weapons systems. All indicative of decline, much as the Roman military had to stop being an active attacking conquering force and had to rely on 'lead from behind' decentralised limitanei forces.