Agreed.
What exactly have they done that's so egregious? I don't see any difference between their content and the endless tirade of opinion based material published by mainstream, corporate channels. If YouTube is happy with Rachel Maddow, Fareed Zakaria, Tucker and Hannity then it has no reason to silence PragerU. A central complaint against so many of these tech companies isn't the rules, its the way that they're inconsistently applied (usually as a result of interest group pressure).Personally I have mixed feelings about the censorship of PragerU, I mean they're pieces of , I doubt many would disagree with that.
Agreed. As I mentioned above, I do feel a certain sense of schadenfreude at content and channels of the indy and far left being deplatformed and/or buried as a consequence of the very "hate speech" policies which the radical left demanded in the first place.But what goes around comes around, it is inevitable that the same mechanisms that combat the ideas I disagree with might be used with the same unquestionable and absolute power to eradicate other ideas from the humanity's most significant public forum.