Thread: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

  1. #4221

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by Infidel144 View Post
    Democrat National Socialist Party
    Yes, being asked to wear a mask or get vaccinated is the same as the holocaust.

    Answer me this: Is everyone who says they had a family member die of Covid lying? Are they all part of the conspiracy?

  2. #4222

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    If there’s no force field, how do you explain this then:

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 


    Of these facts there cannot be any shadow of doubt: for instance, that civil society was renovated in every part by Christian institutions; that in the strength of that renewal the human race was lifted up to better things-nay, that it was brought back from death to life, and to so excellent a life that nothing more perfect had been known before, or will come to be known in the ages that have yet to be. - Pope Leo XIII

  3. #4223
    EmperorBatman999's Avatar I say, what, what?
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Why do you want to know?
    Posts
    11,891

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by Coughdrop addict View Post
    Yes, being asked told...get vaccinated is the same as the holocaust.

    Answer me this: Is everyone who says they had a family member die of Covid lying? Are they all part of the conspiracy?
    Fixed regarding the vaccine part. They aren't asking at this point, they're telling, with legal and financial penalties for failing to comply.

    As far as masks, overblown issue. It's annoying wear, but I don't mind them as long they're doing their job cutting down on spread.

    That's literally true for all vaccines. They're not force fields.
    This seems like serious gaslighting here and does a disservice to all the other vaccines. We can count on most vaccines to reliably stop infection and transmission. We got vaccinated with polio, it doesn't spread anymore. We once vaccinated for smallpox and completely eradicated from the public. We have been giving the COVID vaccines too much a casual pass to fall short of what we expect out of more-or-less any other vaccine.
    Last edited by EmperorBatman999; January 20, 2022 at 09:53 AM.

  4. #4224

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by EmperorBatman999 View Post
    Fixed regarding the vaccine part. They aren't asking at this point, they're telling, with legal and financial penalties for failing to comply.
    Employers are telling you, not government. Government is asking. That's one of the downsides of the anti-union "right to work" laws your side pushes, your employer can make you do things or get fired.

    I just fail to see the problem with government setting laws aimed at the common good. Do you object to the government saying you must be sober to drive? Are laws against neglecting and beating children also unreasonable assaults on civil liberties?

    As far as masks, overblown issue. It's annoying wear, but I don't mind them as long they're doing their job cutting down on spread.
    According to many on your side wearing a mask is communism.

  5. #4225

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by Coughdrop addict View Post
    Yes, being asked to wear a mask or get vaccinated is the same as the holocaust.

    Answer me this: Is everyone who says they had a family member die of Covid lying? Are they all part of the conspiracy?
    I don't recall saying anything about "the holocaust" or "the conspiracy".
    Perhaps your "memory' is becoming even more unreliable than already demonstrated...

  6. #4226
    EmperorBatman999's Avatar I say, what, what?
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Why do you want to know?
    Posts
    11,891

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by Coughdrop addict View Post
    Employers are telling you, not government. Government is asking. That's one of the downsides of the anti-union "right to work" laws your side pushes, your employer can make you do things or get fired.

    I just fail to see the problem with government setting laws aimed at the common good. Do you object to the government saying you must be sober to drive? Are laws against neglecting and beating children also unreasonable assaults on civil liberties?

    According to many on your side wearing a mask is communism.
    State and municipal governments still have an upheld Supreme Court precedent backing up their police powers to enforce a vaccine mandate. In any case, there are now several national governments which are pushing for a universal vaccine mandate, like Austria and Australia.

    If unions were stronger, it would've simply been the unions pushing the mandates, rather than employers. Overall, it would've made hardly any difference.

    Finally, I fail to see how the vaccine is the way, the only way, to serve the greater good. It best benefits the hospitals, but why should people at low risk need the vaccine? If the low-risk groups get ill, don't take the vaccine, and survive, they get immunity that eliminates them as a health threat for at least several months.

  7. #4227

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by EmperorBatman999 View Post
    State and municipal governments still have an upheld Supreme Court precedent backing up their police powers to enforce a vaccine mandate. In any case, there are now several national governments which are pushing for a universal vaccine mandate, like Austria and Australia.
    And as I supplied a couple pages back, large amounts of members of the NS-DNC want the State to punish people who refuse or question the chinese cave bat lab lung aids virus vaccine, much like actual nazis demanded martial law in response to people exercising their 1st Amendment rights to peaceably assemble and petition against lockdowns along with summary stripping of rights and imprisonment...
    Last edited by Infidel144; January 20, 2022 at 10:58 AM.

  8. #4228

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by PointOfViewGun View Post
    You had no trouble with citing a different number that uses the same methodology just a moment ago when it suited your claim. Are you arguing against your own posts now?
    A (likely rapidly waning) efficacy of 50-80% in reducing symptomatic infection (not even total infection) is not significant enough to attain herd immunity or justify mandates in most situations (the context of the conversation). This is shown both by the studies and by the record breaking case numbers in many majority vaccinated countries where O is the dominant strain. The suggestion that said case numbers are merely "circumstantial" is false (the lack of infection protection in the double-jabbed provides clear evidence of O's immune evasiveness and it is known that O is 2-4x more contagious than D). As mentioned above, also false is the repeated claim that it was argued that "current vaccines provide no significant effectiveness".



  9. #4229

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by EmperorBatman999 View Post
    This seems like serious gaslighting here and does a disservice to all the other vaccines. We can count on most vaccines to reliably stop infection and transmission. We got vaccinated with polio, it doesn't spread anymore. We once vaccinated for smallpox and completely eradicated from the public. We have been giving the COVID vaccines too much a casual pass to fall short of what we expect out of more-or-less any other vaccine.
    It merely highlights the demonstrably fallacious nature of your entire position. No vaccine is 100% effective. What made past vaccination efforts effective is vast participation of effected population group. Polio is a great example. It requires multiple shots. Even at 2nd shot we only hit 90% efficacy. Yes, not all vaccines share high efficacy as not all viruses are easy to battle against. Smallpox vaccine similarly doesn't provide 100% efficacy and this starts to go down after 3-5 years.


    Quote Originally Posted by Cope View Post
    A (likely rapidly waning) efficacy of 50-80% in reducing symptomatic infection (not even total infection) is not significant enough to attain herd immunity or justify mandates in most situations (the context of the conversation). This is shown both by the studies and by the record breaking case numbers in many majority vaccinated countries where O is the dominant strain. The suggestion that said case numbers are merely "circumstantial" is false (the lack of infection protection in the double-jabbed provides clear evidence of O's immune evasiveness and it is known that O is 2-4x more contagious than D). As mentioned above, also false is the repeated claim that it was argued that "current vaccines provide no significant effectiveness".
    That doesn't really address what I said but, sure. You seem to be going back on your word, and then back again... Neither study, nor the latest trend, support what you claimed as I pointed out in detail, of which you chose not to refute, but instead chose to wonder off with tangents. You say its false that efficacy was argued, even though your example were of discussing efficacy. You have yet to provide any data on efficacy of vaccines against transmission then? That's not part of efficacy? If you used that much energy that you spent in running in circles for actually searching studies I'm sure you'd have better results.
    The Armenian Issue

  10. #4230

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by Infidel144 View Post
    I don't recall saying anything about "the holocaust" or "the conspiracy".
    Perhaps your "memory' is becoming even more unreliable than already demonstrated...
    You called the Democratic Party the Democrat National Socialist Party in a clear attempt to link them to the Nazi Party and the Holocaust. At least have the moral courage to stand by your baseless slander.

    Quote Originally Posted by EmperorBatman999 View Post

    Finally, I fail to see how the vaccine is the way, the only way, to serve the greater good. It best benefits the hospitals, but why should people at low risk need the vaccine? If the low-risk groups get ill, don't take the vaccine, and survive, they get immunity that eliminates them as a health threat for at least several months.
    How do you know you're low risk? I've seen plenty of re-infections, many much more serious than the first one, and 20-somethings who thought they were hard-bodied Adonis's ending up wasting away on ventilators after losing 50% or more of their lung capacity to Covid.

    That's what really gets me about the "just a cold" and "miracle Ivemectin" people. They know they're lying. Otherwise they wouldn't show up at the ER begging for help from the doctors they've spent years demonizing as part of the conspiracy to oppress them with 5G demon-vaccines. They'd at least have the dignity to die at home rather than taking up a bed at the taxpayer's expense.

  11. #4231
    Praeses
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    8,355

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by EmperorBatman999 View Post
    ...
    ....
    This seems like serious gaslighting here and does a disservice to all the other vaccines...
    Gaslighting, what does that look like?

    Quote Originally Posted by EmperorBatman999 View Post
    These extreme positions further reinforce my suspicion that COVID paranoia is a mental illness that elicits extreme inhumane and sociopathic socio-political positions. I am deeply upset that the margins for the opposition (mostly in 70s percentages) are actually this low. Even more people should oppose these proposals most strongly.

    Of course, this mental illness has been fostered by the media, political, and medical establishments, who have basically spent the last two years black-pilling Blue voters into thinking that the world is ending, that we can never expect normalcy again, and that it is all the Right's/Unvaccinated's fault. For the health of society, anyone generating this amount of fear and paranoia from the political left needs to held to account.
    Not sure if you posting in good faith, but one last swing at it.

    Quote Originally Posted by EmperorBatman999 View Post
    Slows the spread is the operative term here. The case isn't that the vaccine stops the spread, and therein lies the problem. There will always be a risk that if a vaccinated person becomes infected and goes out in public, they can spread the disease. The fact this risk continues to persist at all is a problem. This is why major outbreaks keep happening even in highly vaccinated societies. The vaccine is not ending the pandemic as long as transmission rates remain as high they are and outbreaks keep happening. I don't know how I can be any more clear.
    You argument makes literally no sense. Masks like vaccines slow the spread. Both work to make the disease spread less quickly, so less people get it over a given period of time. This means there are more resources available per sick person. Its the difference between getting 12 bills for $100 over a year, or getting one bill for $1200 due this week.

    There's a greater likelihood of the vaccinated needing less treatment, and less chance of dying, and less chance of "long COVID" vs vaccine related permanent illness.

    The "slowing", which actually means the person infects less people per outing. compounds with other measures so masks, vaccines, common sense and support for the exposed and infected gives a greater chance of controlling the plague.

    Letting it rip gives the infected an increased chance of spreading the illness, getting long term illness, and dying, as well as breeding new variants, and absurd pressure on healthcare services. It doesn't lead to the disease burning out and costs more than the vaccine program.

    This is extremely basic epidemiology.
    Jatte lambastes Calico Rat

  12. #4232
    antaeus's Avatar Cool and normal
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cool and normal
    Posts
    5,419

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    When we're talking communicable disease, your right to bodily integrity runs straight into the rights of your co-workers to not be exposed to the greater risk your presence generates. Who has the greater right to safe employment? Those who look to mitigate risk or those who do not?

    Your government has decided the rights of those majority of people who voluntarily chose to reduce societal risk, outweighs your right to employment if you choose not to reduce societal risk. As we discussed last time, your options for work - as a voluntarily more risky person, are not insignificant. You can still be like the up to 60% of Australians who have worked from home over the last year, or work in an industry that doesn't have a mandate. That is the compromise your society has made to you. It's up to you if you take advantage of that offer.
    Last edited by alhoon; January 24, 2022 at 12:55 AM. Reason: continuity - off topic removed
    IN PATROCINIVM SVB MARENOSTRUM

  13. #4233
    Stario's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Not the CCCP
    Posts
    2,042

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by antaeus View Post
    But when we're talking communicable disease, your right to bodily integrity runs straight into the rights of your co-workers to not be exposed to the greater risk your presence generates. Who has the greater right to safe employment? Those who look to mitigate risk or those who do not?
    Not at all!!! The right to self-determination is also a central tenet of Australian law. In the medical context, this means that a competent adult patient has the right to refuse medical treatment for whatever reasons, RATIONAL or IRRATIONAL.
    A patient's body is his/her own and he/she may refuse to accept treatment as desired. The Australian High Court had described this as "a right in each person to bodily integrity".
    This means I can be selfish (in fact the law even allows me to be selfish) as far as what goes into my body (that's assuming even if the vaccines stopped transmission which they don't).


    Your government has decided the rights of those majority of people who voluntarily chose to reduce societal risk, outweighs your right to employment if you choose not to reduce societal risk
    It's NOT Government business to be involved with my healthcare, my health, and/or what goes into my body. This should be between me and my Doctor. But watch this space a massive HCW class action has been filed for the end of January in NSW. The narrative is crumbling...

    As we discussed last time, your options for work - as a voluntarily more risky person, are not insignificant. You can still be like the up to 60% of Australians who have worked from home over the last year, or work in an industry that doesn't have a mandate. That is the compromise your society has made to you. It's up to you if you take advantage of that offer.
    I am actually currently negotiating a better offer to work from home; so things turned out alright (The Emergency Department can get somewhat hectic so will not say no for a bit of respite)
    But what I still don't understand is that my unvaccinated colleagues who tested positive are allowed to keep working w/ vulnerable patients as long as they are asymptomatic. MADNESS I know...
    Last edited by alhoon; January 24, 2022 at 12:55 AM. Reason: off topic removed

  14. #4234

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by antaeus View Post
    But when we're talking communicable disease, your right to bodily integrity runs straight into the rights of your co-workers to not be exposed to the greater risk your presence generates. Who has the greater right to safe employment? Those who look to mitigate risk or those who do not?
    Except: (1) the dominant variant is so communicable that being vaccinated does not provide reliable protection against either infection or transmission; (2) vaccinated co-workers are extremely well protected against the disease; (3) infected persons can self-isolate; (4) many of the unvaccinated will have acquired some degree of natural immunity through prior infection and; (5) the most at risk groups are overwhelmingly past working age (for instance, new data from the UK confirms that average C19 death age was ~the average life expectancy, itself more than a decade above the retirement age).

    So even though Stario is wrong about vaccine effectiveness, he is correct about violations of medical consent and privacy which are celebrated by Covid hysterics/authoritarians.

    Your government has decided the rights of those majority of people who voluntarily chose to reduce societal risk, outweighs your right to employment if you choose not to reduce societal risk. As we discussed last time, your options for work - as a voluntarily more risky person, are not insignificant. You can still be like the up to 60% of Australians who have worked from home over the last year, or work in an industry that doesn't have a mandate. That is the compromise your society has made to you. It's up to you if you take advantage of that offer.
    State or corporate policy is not, and never will be, a yardstick, for morality.
    Last edited by Cope; January 21, 2022 at 11:28 PM.



  15. #4235
    Stario's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Not the CCCP
    Posts
    2,042

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cope View Post
    Except: (1) the dominant variant is so communicable that being vaccinated does not provide reliable protection against either infection or transmission; (2) vaccinated co-workers are extremely well protected against the disease; (3) infected persons can self-isolate; (4) many of the unvaccinated will have acquired some degree of natural immunity through prior infection and (5) the most at risk groups are overwhelmingly past working age (for instance, new data from the UK confirms that average C19 death age was ~the average life expectancy, itself more than a decade above the retirement age).

    So even though Stario is wrong about vaccine effectiveness, he is correct about violations of medical consent and privacy which are celebrated by Covid hysterics/authoritarians.



    State or corporate policy is not, and never will be, a yardstick, for morality.
    With all said...I would argue I am not wrong even about vaccine effectiveness...

    To use Pfizers study as an example. The Pfizer vaccine had a net benefit or Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) of just 0.84% (or less than 1%), and the control group was also unblinded early (amongst other major problems the study had). And sure sometimes a control group will be unblinded early when results from a new treatment are so fantastically positive it would simply be unethical to continue to withhold it.
    But this didn't happen...In the first two months of Pfizer trial, 15 members of the experimental group died (all cause mortality) vs 14 members of the control group. This isn't fantastically positive.
    Not to mention an additional 5 from the placebo group who decided to join the vaccinated side died as well...
    Last edited by Stario; January 21, 2022 at 11:39 PM.

  16. #4236

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    1. This issue is so heavily politicized, it's become tribalized.

    2. The politicians have mostly been vaccinated, regardless of their public positions.

    3. Even if there's a breakthrough, they have access to first class healthcare.

    4. Forty Five has backtracked from his public stance on widespread public vaccination, though probably in an attempt to appeal to suburban voters if and when he runs again.

    5. It's a personal decision if you want to increase the risk of dying; less so if your actions will likely infect others.

    6. Part of the problem, besides populist politicians appealing to their hardcore supporters, is the financial agenda, that prevents a global campaign to try and eradicate it.
    Eats, shoots, and leaves.

  17. #4237
    conon394's Avatar hoi polloi
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Colfax WA, neat I have a barn and 49 acres - I have 2 horses, 15 chickens - but no more pigs
    Posts
    16,794

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by Stario View Post
    With all said...I would argue I am not wrong even about vaccine effectiveness...

    To use Pfizers study as an example. The Pfizer vaccine had a net benefit or Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) of just 0.84% (or less than 1%), and the control group was also unblinded early (amongst other major problems the study had). And sure sometimes a control group will be unblinded early when results from a new treatment are so fantastically positive it would simply be unethical to continue to withhold it.
    But this didn't happen...In the first two months of Pfizer trial, 15 members of the experimental group died (all cause mortality) vs 14 members of the control group. This isn't fantastically positive.
    Not to mention an additional 5 from the placebo group who decided to join the vaccinated side died as well...
    You do realize this post is nonsense right. First why bring up non Covid deaths in either group (that number (covid deaths) would be 2 in the placebo group and 1 in the vaccine group - none from complications of the vaccine). Second then why do you cite absolute risk reduction? The way you do try to says you really have no ideal what the statistic is telling you vs RRR. And its not what you think. The Note in the Lancet was clearly aimed at A people who understand that you are talking about vastly 2 different measures. Thus a cautionary notice that simply put B - that since AAR should also be used in this case it seems to show a modestly less effectiveness but only if translated into RRR a few points.
    Last edited by conon394; January 22, 2022 at 09:43 AM.
    IN PATROCINIVM SVB Dromikaites

    'One day when I fly with my hands - up down the sky, like a bird'

    But if the cause be not good, the king himself hath a heavy reckoning to make, when all those legs and arms and heads, chopped off in battle, shall join together at the latter day and cry all 'We died at such a place; some swearing, some crying for surgeon, some upon their wives left poor behind them, some upon the debts they owe, some upon their children rawly left.

    Hyperides of Athens: We know, replied he, that Antipater is good, but we (the Demos of Athens) have no need of a master at present, even a good one.

  18. #4238

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by Stario View Post
    With all said...I would argue I am not wrong even about vaccine effectiveness...

    To use Pfizers study as an example. The Pfizer vaccine had a net benefit or Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) of just 0.84% (or less than 1%), and the control group was also unblinded early (amongst other major problems the study had). And sure sometimes a control group will be unblinded early when results from a new treatment are so fantastically positive it would simply be unethical to continue to withhold it.
    But this didn't happen...In the first two months of Pfizer trial, 15 members of the experimental group died (all cause mortality) vs 14 members of the control group. This isn't fantastically positive.
    Not to mention an additional 5 from the placebo group who decided to join the vaccinated side died as well...
    Can you please link to this Pfizer study?
    The Armenian Issue

  19. #4239
    conon394's Avatar hoi polloi
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Colfax WA, neat I have a barn and 49 acres - I have 2 horses, 15 chickens - but no more pigs
    Posts
    16,794

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by PointOfViewGun View Post
    Can you please link to this Pfizer study?
    Would not matter since the statistics involved are massively abused. But if you want here is the Lancet Note/Comment that is massively not used properly by people who have no ideal what the relative statistics being talked mean

    https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...069-0/fulltext

    Pfizer's 6 month study results are here but obviously now superseded by data from Israel. And of course the US where have a whole pool of people playing self inflicted control group.

    https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...159v1.full.pdf
    Last edited by conon394; January 22, 2022 at 05:10 PM.
    IN PATROCINIVM SVB Dromikaites

    'One day when I fly with my hands - up down the sky, like a bird'

    But if the cause be not good, the king himself hath a heavy reckoning to make, when all those legs and arms and heads, chopped off in battle, shall join together at the latter day and cry all 'We died at such a place; some swearing, some crying for surgeon, some upon their wives left poor behind them, some upon the debts they owe, some upon their children rawly left.

    Hyperides of Athens: We know, replied he, that Antipater is good, but we (the Demos of Athens) have no need of a master at present, even a good one.

  20. #4240

    Default Re: Coronavirus outbreak - From China to the World.

    Quote Originally Posted by Stario View Post
    With all said...I would argue I am not wrong even about vaccine effectiveness...

    To use Pfizers study as an example. The Pfizer vaccine had a net benefit or Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) of just 0.84% (or less than 1%), and the control group was also unblinded early (amongst other major problems the study had). And sure sometimes a control group will be unblinded early when results from a new treatment are so fantastically positive it would simply be unethical to continue to withhold it.
    But this didn't happen...In the first two months of Pfizer trial, 15 members of the experimental group died (all cause mortality) vs 14 members of the control group. This isn't fantastically positive.
    Not to mention an additional 5 from the placebo group who decided to join the vaccinated side died as well...
    Quote Originally Posted by conon394 View Post
    Would not matter since the statistics involved are massively abused. But if you want here is the Lancet Note/Comment that is massively not used properly by people who have no ideal what the relative statistics being talked mean
    https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...069-0/fulltext
    Pfizer's 6 month study results are here but obviously now superseded by data from Israel. And of course the US where have a whole pool of people playing self inflicted control group.
    https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...159v1.full.pdf
    While the Lancet study cites an ARR it provides no information on methodology as this label is highly dependent on various factors. We don't even know what is the risk of... The study does not say the placebo group was unblinded early. It doesn't say 5 of them died after they were unblinded as well. 2 of them did. These are not number of the dead due to COVID19.

    Among 42,094 evaluable ≥12-year-olds without evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, 77 COVID-19 cases with onset ≥7 days post-dose 2 were observed through the data cut-off (March 13, 2021) among vaccine recipients and 850 among placebo recipients, corresponding to 91.3% VE (95% CI [89.0-93.2]; Table 2). Among 44,486 evaluable participants, irrespective of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, 81 COVID-19 cases were observed among vaccine and 873 among placebo recipients, corresponding to 91.1% VE (95% CI [88.8-93.0]).
    Of 31 cases of severe, FDA-defined COVID-19,12 with onset post-dose 1, 30 occurred in placebo recipients, corresponding to 96.7% VE (95% CI 80.3-99.9) against severe COVID-19 (Fig. 2, Table S6).
    Given these findings the Pfizer vaccine was demonstrably effective at the time of the study.

    Last edited by PointOfViewGun; January 23, 2022 at 04:20 AM.
    The Armenian Issue

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •