View Poll Results: For which party would you vote?

Voters
33. You may not vote on this poll
  • Conservative Party.

    8 24.24%
  • Brexit Party.

    3 9.09%
  • Scottish National Party.

    4 12.12%
  • Labour Party.

    10 30.30%
  • Liberal Democrats.

    2 6.06%
  • Democratic Unionist Party.

    0 0%
  • Sinn Féin.

    3 9.09%
  • Independent Group for Change.

    0 0%
  • Other (please ellaborate).

    3 9.09%
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 133

Thread: UK election thread

  1. #21
    Dante Von Hespburg's Avatar Sloth's Inferno
    took an arrow to the knee

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    4,996

    Default Re: UK election thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclops View Post
    I wouldn't give too much credit to "Boomer memes" for the result in Australia, its not in the top three elements. Its nice for these boys the be getting a paycheck though, bu they do tend to lower the tone.

    The most important detail was a mining "billionaire" spending more than the two major parties combined on advertising to start a "third party" that preferenced the conservative side, and ran a completely false campaign. Essentially Clive Palmer more than tripled the conservative advertising budget. The payback has been nice treatment by the current government in his legal battles with Chinese and other investors.

    The second issue was the choice of "Boring Bill" Shorten, a typical shonky Union boss as leader. He was meant to be a bland choice offering few points of attack, but he's actually knifed two Labour PMs so that policy was a bust, and was also incongruent with the policy pitch, which brings us to the third point.

    The third element was the choice of policy profile: Labor gambled on a big statement with lots of details which opened them up to heaps of criticism, the Conservatives went small and just said "we're doing a great job and we will keep doing that". Between Labor blunders and Palmer's enormous intervention the Liberals snuck in.
    Cheers for the details on that mate, its interesting to get a proper on station run-down, i'm starting to get into the politics of Australia and NZ (British policy analysts have a lot of plans for you guys post-brexit/like pretending we can still play empire 2.0...just without telling you that you're part of it ).


    Thx for the details. Is the UK so regionally divided that no one leader can unify enough electorates?


    It has been an issue certainly since 2010, its now very difficult for either of the big two parties to get a 'real' majority as you say because their typical electorates have splintered (Even Cameron in 2015 was absolutely tiny and unstable by historic standards)- it's been a growing criticism that FPTP is unfit for 'modern' politics in any real democratic sense in Britain as voters are being drawn more and more to single party or niche politics... and either voting for that, or being forced (as arguably in 2017) to tactical vote for a party that actually they do not really care for. The 'Broad Church' approach of the big two has fractured by essentially the political fabric being stretched too thinly to try and contain this- hence the Conservative 'left' being essentially ejected from the party, and the Labour right also being given the boot- both of which would in any other system see an increase in vote share for the Lib-dem.

    But immediate divides- indeed as we saw in 2017, the traditional Labour and Conservative heartlands are no longer the absolute strongholds they once were- Labour's 'Northern Wall' is vulnerable now more than ever to the Brexit Party and Conservatives (Its saving might be the fact that these two challengers are essentially competing for the same voting groups), while even with the Brexit party promising not to stand in the Conservatives heartlands, the Lib-dems and Labour in some areas present a big enough threat that there is a significant chance for losses here, potentially crippling ones. Scotlands set to go full Clansman.

    This isn't helped as you rightly allude to- no one leader is actually 'popular', even in their core homelands- other political factors and perceptions have made them divisive figures even in their own ranks.

    Its likely thus we're heading for a hung parliament again, indeed the polling company Survation who got the last few GE's and referendum right have just published a poll placing Labour now only 6 points behind the Conservatives- if this plays out that is a huge swing and indeed places us on course for this election getting easily into hung territory- which means coalition (which essentially writes off the Conservatives), but again coalition is a failure for the Westminster system whose whole point is to give one party the 'winner takes all' factor.

    Though i'd even add the caveat here that even if Labour or the Conservatives do get a majority, it'll be based on tactical voting (We've already seen Farage and his pact, or the Lib-dems not standing in Canterbury or the Lib-Green-SNP remain alliance), and we'll probably see it crumble right back down at the next election (Or we accept that tactical voting and electoral pacts are somehow 'democratic' in the moral sense and now for the first time a common part of the Westminster system instead of 'winner takes all'- for instance if i hate Lib-dems domestic agenda, but the Greens refuse to field a candidate in my constituency as part of an alliance, then there is an issue).

    EDIT: To add to the above -I've actually had the honour of being invited to give a series of political talks around the South-East and London, these have almost wrapped up so i feel i can post drawing on parts of what i said. So an interesting point to add to the regional thing and how hard it is for a leader and/or party to command a majority (and how sustainable FPTP majorities are probably a thing of the past) is the decline of 'Safe Seats', which highlights a continuous churn towards a more diffused political spectrum, rather than a 'big two' monopoly.

    In 1979 there were only 25% of seats that could be deemed marginal- the rest were ‘safe seats’- which could be lost but required a lot of battering. But social media/media reach giving greater exposure to smaller parties and the formation of regional/One issue parties that are at odds with FPTP- Lib-dems, Greens, SNP, UKIP, Brexit Party- have meant that now more than 1 in 3 seats are marginal with majorities significantly less than 5000, with only 15% of seats being ‘safe’. That's a seismic change and a blow to historic FPTP.

    Now FPTP naturally protects the big-two still to a large degree, however it at this point is more of an unfair 'prop' over stability giver- as essentially its helping to keep the Conservatives and Labour party afloat through tactical voting, rather than actually giving them 'stable' majorities as would historically be expected. Essentially FPTP is indeed unfit.

    Added to this, voting concerns have grown, even with Brexit dominating we're seeing new 'major concerns' being added for the big two parties to try and accommodate.

    https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.ne...20Issues_W.pdf

    Climate change is now on parlance with the economy as being a top voting concern (and are roughly on the same percentages- though Climate Change has experienced rapid and sustained shoot-up and may end up surpassing), this is actually similar to the growth of how Brexit became a political concern. In 2015 only 23% of voters actually listed the EU as something they gave a damn about- positive or negative, this was indeed even with UKIP and the debates about EU membership and immigration (Which was a factor that was politically tied to the EU) gaining prominence. Climate Change could be the next 'big issue', and again it is something that the big two will more than likely struggle with as both have internal splits on the subject and have to juggle other concerns (Moreover while climate change denial isn't big in the UK- opposition to some of the more 'radical'/necessary (depending on view) policies needed to tackle it (Carbon 0, extra taxation etc) are controversial- a new UKIP style party could easily arise on this space, likewise the Greens (whose vote share has increased currently) are best placed to represent that other extreme- in the mid-term this is likely to become another flashpoint. So it'll be interesting as the big two continue to fail to return to two-party politics (there may be some instances when they get a majority, but i would argue that is not going to be the norm) at what point do we finally all accept that FPTP is outdated and needs to change to accommodate the modern plurality in politics?
    Last edited by Dante Von Hespburg; November 13, 2019 at 04:59 AM.
    House of Caesars: Under the Patronage of Char Aznable

    Proud Patron of the roguishly suave Gatsby


  2. #22
    Praeses
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    8,355

    Default Re: UK election thread

    Yeah FPTP is a bit of a dinosaur from the Australian POV. We have a messy preference system (it gets tinkered with from time to time to keep incumbents in power) that gets gamed by lobbyists to create near-hung parliaments, but it seems more responsive. We're still hostage to three monolith parties who benefit from the apparatus.

    Despite the tinkering we are (like the UK) experiencing fragmentation as smaller interest groups lock down the major parties: essentially Liberals represent banks and other financial elites, nationals are miners (they used to represent the farmers now they have become a troll party) and Labor is in a bit of a quandary as it is the creature of the union movement, but that's become a smaller specialised shop (more like guilds than old style mass unions) and they have attempted Blairite middle ground populism with mixed results.

    Commentators here hold up Irish proportional representation as a more sensitive model but to my eye that makes for more fragmentation. The big three parties hate that idea: they have tinkered with the electoral system to shore up their position which is crumbling. The Greens are hacking a Labor's base and the Liberals and nationals have resorted to race politics to shore up their own numbers which they were losing to actual racists like Hanson. Despite these (pretty self serving and corrupt) measures faith in the Big three is eroding and we have government by minority as the rule.

    I don't like the populist approach, the lunatic greens are about the only sincere principled party in the mix. However the major party structures have not been modernised and from a Darwinian PoV they should die and be replaced. They are not relinquishing power easily and we may see more corruption as they try to hang on (in fact its almost certain).

    Its not all bad. There's a mad independent called Lambie who was first elected in the miner Palmer's fake party. She's an actual human (Palmer was in a hurry and had to accept any candidate he could find-surprise, one of them wasn't a robot and got elected!) and brings real experience to the Senate (she's a veteran and has an ice-addicted son, and no filter). Her policies are a mash up of good and bad, but she's definitely not a cookie cut from the corporate mould. Likewise a foul mouthed farmer called Katter who talks like a Texas redneck but is an actual human who cares about his electorate.

    If the new crop of independents is like this (and there's signs of more decent people eg the electorate of Indi will only elect a local non-aligned person and i here the current one is good) we can make a government out of them. they do respond to pork barrelling, so you have to watch out government isn't just a utility auction.

    Preferences means you can't get away with 42% politics in Australia. You have to keep at least 51% of the people happy enough and/or satisfy other parties enough to harvest their seconds and thirds. Its not a lot but is the difference between say Cameron bowing to a fraction of his own party on the utterly stupid Brexit vote (against the best interests of the country) and Howard (who is a worse maggot than Cameron as a person believe me) taking a principled stand on gun control for the good of community cohesion after Port Arthur. The shooters in this country gave up a lot for the sack of unity in that issue, because it benefited the majority.
    Jatte lambastes Calico Rat

  3. #23

    Default Re: UK election thread

    So far it looks like the Tories election to lose, comfortably ahead at the moment, despite Boris's best efforts to undermine that. A lot depends on the leaders debate. What I can't fathom is Nigel Farage's behaviour, Not standing as MP looked weak. Unilaterally withdrawing candidates from safe Tory seats undermined his message that his was the only true Brexit. The result, the collapse of support for the Brexit Party. Was he got at?
    Absolutley Barking, Mudpit Mutt Former Patron: Garbarsardar

    "Out of the crooked tree of humanity,no straight thing can be made." Immanuel Kant
    "Oh Yeah? What about a cricket bat? That's pretty straight. Just off the top of my head..." Al Murray, Pub Landlord.

  4. #24
    Kyriakos's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Thessalonike, The Byzantine Empire
    Posts
    9,838

    Default Re: UK election thread



    Did Marrbot malfunction? He seems to have commented in the end to Corbyn "you did brilliantly" (?)

    I hope Corbyn wins the elections.
    Λέων μεν ὄνυξι κρατεῖ, κέρασι δε βούς, ἄνθρωπος δε νῷι
    "While the lion prevails with its claws, and the ox through its horns, man does by his thinking"
    Anaxagoras of Klazomenae, 5th century BC










  5. #25
    Aexodus's Avatar Persuasion>Coercion
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    8,765
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: UK election thread

    It’s an hour long vid mate haha. When’s the timestamp for that.
    Patronised by Pontifex Maximus
    Quote Originally Posted by Himster View Post
    The trick is to never be honest. That's what this social phenomenon is engineering: publicly conform, or else.

  6. #26
    Kyriakos's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Thessalonike, The Byzantine Empire
    Posts
    9,838

    Default Re: UK election thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Aexodus View Post
    It’s an hour long vid mate haha. When’s the timestamp for that.

    Start at 1.11.00

    Ie it is the very last question.
    Λέων μεν ὄνυξι κρατεῖ, κέρασι δε βούς, ἄνθρωπος δε νῷι
    "While the lion prevails with its claws, and the ox through its horns, man does by his thinking"
    Anaxagoras of Klazomenae, 5th century BC










  7. #27
    Ludicus's Avatar Comes Limitis
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    13,071

    Default Re: UK election thread

    Peter Osborne is not afraid to criticize his own side, https://boris-johnson-lies.com/
    Regularly updated by Peter as he uncovers more information.
    Il y a quelque chose de pire que d'avoir une âme perverse. C’est d'avoir une âme habituée
    Charles Péguy

    Every human society must justify its inequalities: reasons must be found because, without them, the whole political and social edifice is in danger of collapsing”.
    Thomas Piketty

  8. #28
    Kyriakos's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Thessalonike, The Byzantine Empire
    Posts
    9,838

    Default Re: UK election thread

    ITV live debate between Corbyn and Boris ended.
    Corbyn nailed it. Bojo, as usual, went unprepared and asked 40 times about brexit, ending up booed and laughed at.
    Imo, if only the british aren't dumb they will vote for Corbyn.
    Λέων μεν ὄνυξι κρατεῖ, κέρασι δε βούς, ἄνθρωπος δε νῷι
    "While the lion prevails with its claws, and the ox through its horns, man does by his thinking"
    Anaxagoras of Klazomenae, 5th century BC










  9. #29
    Aexodus's Avatar Persuasion>Coercion
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    8,765
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: UK election thread



    I’m afraid Corbyn has quite a mountain to climb if he wants to win over the public. Personally I would think it is quite dumb to elect a man who blamed terrorist attacks such as the Enniskillen bombing on the UK government and wants to abolish capitalism.
    Patronised by Pontifex Maximus
    Quote Originally Posted by Himster View Post
    The trick is to never be honest. That's what this social phenomenon is engineering: publicly conform, or else.

  10. #30
    Kyriakos's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Thessalonike, The Byzantine Empire
    Posts
    9,838

    Default Re: UK election thread

    ^I assume the IRA history took place after 2017, else it makes even that chart seem more bizarre
    Anyway, one can always hope that the british aren't ready to become Austria or Hungary, or (AfD) Germany and pretty much a ridiculous tory/con state for life.
    I like Corbyn; he is caring and honest, unlike the tory clowns.
    Λέων μεν ὄνυξι κρατεῖ, κέρασι δε βούς, ἄνθρωπος δε νῷι
    "While the lion prevails with its claws, and the ox through its horns, man does by his thinking"
    Anaxagoras of Klazomenae, 5th century BC










  11. #31
    Alwyn's Avatar Frothy Goodness
    Content Director Patrician Citizen

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    12,283

    Default Re: UK election thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Aexodus View Post
    I’m afraid Corbyn has quite a mountain to climb if he wants to win over the public.
    I think you're right. Comparing 2017 opinion polls with 2019 polls, Conservative support looks similar, Labour are down and I agree that perceptions of Corbyn seem to be the cause. Previously, I thought that the UK could be heading for an outcome similar to the 2005 election, but now I'm wondering if we might heading for something closer to 2001, when the winners got 41% of the vote and 413 MPs, while the second largest party got 32% and 166 MPs. Electoral Calculus are predicting a Conservative majority of 72. Of course, elections are unpredictable, this could all change in a week (or in a day).

    One thing that surprises me is the exposure of tricks, like the doctored video of Keir Starmer, doesn't seem to have had any effect on Conservative support. Maybe any loss of support is cancelled out by people who haven't heard that the video was edited to make it appear that he couldn't answer a question?

    Quote Originally Posted by Aexodus View Post
    Personally I would think it is quite dumb to elect a man who blamed terrorist attacks such as the Enniskillen bombing on the UK government and wants to abolish capitalism.
    Have you got sources for those points?
    Last edited by Alwyn; November 24, 2019 at 02:39 AM.

  12. #32
    Aexodus's Avatar Persuasion>Coercion
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    8,765
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: UK election thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Alwyn View Post
    Have you got sources for those points?
    Have you seriously never heard of those facts?

    https://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/op...-1-7991801/amp
    Of all the many examples of his apologising for the IRA, perhaps the most contemptible is the House of Commons motion that he signed a mere fortnight after the 1987 Poppy Day massacre in Enniskillen (read Colin Armstrong’s detailed rebuttal of the notion that IRA attacks on civilians were typically mistakes.

    The very first line of the House of the Commons document after Enniskillen, signed by various hard-left MPs such as Tony Benn, Diane Abbott and Ken Livingstone, is telling: “That this House expresses its horror at the continuing loss of life in Northern Ireland, as occurred at Enniskillen, believes that the violence in Northern Ireland stems primarily from the long-standing British occupation of that country and the partition imposed by force in 1921.”
    https://amp.theguardian.com/politics...pitalism-in-uk
    Corbyn vows to end ‘greed-is-good’ capitalism in UK


    In conference speech Labour leader to lay out plans to change direction of economy




    Jeremy Corbyn will on Wednesday attack the “greed-is-good” capitalism that he claims has resulted in large swaths of the UK being left behind, promising a raft of new policies including a “green jobs revolution” that will create 400,000 new positions.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-pol...ism-is-his-job
    The shadow chancellor says he wants to transform the economy so the UK becomes a socialist society.

    John McDonnell was asked whether "overthrowing capitalism", which he used to list as a hobby, was now his job.

    He replied "yes it is" before saying he wanted to "radically challenge the system as it now is".

    John McDonnel is in fact an IRA supporter.

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/m...gn-cv33kbr2n88
    John McDonnell called for the “ballot, the bullet and the bomb” to unite Ireland at the height of the IRA’s terrorism campaign against Britain, The Times can reveal. The shadow chancellor also suggested, with black humour, that Labour councillors who refused to meet the IRA’s political wing should have their knee-caps shot off.
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics...and.devolution
    A call to honour the "bravery and sacrifice" of the IRA by Labour MP John McDonnell sparked controversy last night, with Conservatives and unionists uniting to denounce the leftwinger and the Labour party distancing itself from his remarks.

    At a gathering to commemorate the IRA hunger striker Bobby Sands, Mr McDonnell said: "It's about time we started honouring those people involved in the armed struggle. It was the bombs and bullets and sacrifice made by the likes of Bobby Sands that brought Britain to the negotiating table. The peace we have now is due to the action of the IRA."
    Patronised by Pontifex Maximus
    Quote Originally Posted by Himster View Post
    The trick is to never be honest. That's what this social phenomenon is engineering: publicly conform, or else.

  13. #33
    Kyriakos's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Thessalonike, The Byzantine Empire
    Posts
    9,838

    Default Re: UK election thread




    Bojo gets asked about the conservative party changing its twitter page to the deliberately misleading "factcheckuk" name. Bojo proceeds to not answer and in his attempt to make fun of the question says that there are more important goals to set and questions to ask, and names a few so as to end with what the Labour stance is on brexit. But one of the goals he named as to be researched is Fermat's last theorem. Which has been proven...
    What an utter buffoon.
    Λέων μεν ὄνυξι κρατεῖ, κέρασι δε βούς, ἄνθρωπος δε νῷι
    "While the lion prevails with its claws, and the ox through its horns, man does by his thinking"
    Anaxagoras of Klazomenae, 5th century BC










  14. #34

    Default Re: UK election thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Aexodus View Post
    Have you seriously never heard of those facts?

    https://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/op...-1-7991801/amp
    “That this House expresses its horror at the continuing loss of life in Northern Ireland, as occurred at Enniskillen, believes that the violence in Northern Ireland stems primarily from the long-standing British occupation of that country and the partition imposed by force in 1921.”


    Are you suggesting the troubles aren't stemmed from the British occupation of Northern Ireland? Interesting point of view. Who is to blame then? Aliens?? Russians? Elvis??

    Wow!! Socialist dislikes Capitalism Shock Horror!!!! In other news water found to be wet.

    More at seven...

    Quote Originally Posted by Aexodus View Post
    Seems you've added up 2+2 and made 5. Is everyone who supports the cause of Irish Republicanism a terrorist? Or just the people you dislike.

    Do you hear that?? What's that sound??? Oh yeah, I think it's the bottom of the barrel being scraped....

  15. #35
    Aexodus's Avatar Persuasion>Coercion
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    8,765
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: UK election thread

    Quote Originally Posted by TheLeft View Post
    [/I]

    Are you suggesting the troubles aren't stemmed from the British occupation of Northern Ireland? Interesting point of view. Who is to blame then? Aliens?? Russians? Elvis??
    The IRA and UVF. THE Enniskillen bombing has nothing to do with Britain.

    There is no occupation. That is a lie. The fact Corbyn and McDonnel ever believed this is extremely worrying when they want to run the country. If a domestic terror threat like the IRA appeared again then I have no guarantee my own government will oppose said terrorist group, which shot, bombed, and injured innocent people.

    Wow!! Socialist dislikes Capitalism Shock Horror!!!! In other news water found to be wet.

    More at seven...
    Abolishing capitalism is an extreme and stupid position.

    Seems you've added up 2+2 and made 5. Is everyone who supports the cause of Irish Republicanism a terrorist? Or just the people you dislike.

    Do you hear that?? What's that sound??? Oh yeah, I think it's the bottom of the barrel being scraped....
    People who support the IRA support terrorism. People who say bullets and bombs should be used to unite Ireland support terrorism. John McDonnel did both.
    Last edited by Aexodus; November 27, 2019 at 12:28 PM.
    Patronised by Pontifex Maximus
    Quote Originally Posted by Himster View Post
    The trick is to never be honest. That's what this social phenomenon is engineering: publicly conform, or else.

  16. #36
    Ludicus's Avatar Comes Limitis
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    13,071

    Default Re: UK election thread

    It seems to me that if Johnson falls short of an outright majority, Corbyn would be strongly placed to lead a minority coalition made up of Labour/SNP/Lib Dems. Nicola hints SNP would support Corbyn at the head of a minority government, in exchange for a Scottish independence referendum.Jo Swinson says she would rather go straight to a new general election, but all that she wants is a Brexit referendum. The same applies to the SNP. What's next? here's my my prediction- a minority coalition and a second Brexit referendum.
    Il y a quelque chose de pire que d'avoir une âme perverse. C’est d'avoir une âme habituée
    Charles Péguy

    Every human society must justify its inequalities: reasons must be found because, without them, the whole political and social edifice is in danger of collapsing”.
    Thomas Piketty

  17. #37

    Default Re: UK election thread

    There was already a Brexit referendum.

  18. #38

    Default Re: UK election thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Aexodus View Post
    People who say bullets and bombs should be used to unite Ireland support terrorism.
    But Ireland was disunited in the first place by using bullets and bombs.
    Optio, Legio I Latina

  19. #39
    nhytgbvfeco2's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    6,443

    Default Re: UK election thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Ludicus View Post
    It seems to me that if Johnson falls short of an outright majority, Corbyn would be strongly placed to lead a minority coalition made up of Labour/SNP/Lib Dems. Nicola hints SNP would support Corbyn at the head of a minority government, in exchange for a Scottish independence referendum.Jo Swinson says she would rather go straight to a new general election, but all that she wants is a Brexit referendum. The same applies to the SNP. What's next? here's my my prediction- a minority coalition and a second Brexit referendum.
    All polls I've seen predict a significant conservative victory, feel free to post contradicting ones. For example, Yougov, which accurately predicted the conservative losses in 2017's election, predicts a 68 seat majority for the conservatives, the biggest since Thatcher in 1987. With Brexit having announced it won't compete for Tory seats it's basically a done deal. Labour would have a chance if the Lib Dems were not running, but the Lib Dems are running.

  20. #40

    Default Re: UK election thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Aexodus View Post
    The IRA and UVF. THE Enniskillen bombing has nothing to do with Britain.

    There is no occupation. That is a lie. The fact Corbyn and McDonnel ever believed this is extremely worrying when they want to run the country. If a domestic terror threat like the IRA appeared again then I have no guarantee my own government will oppose said terrorist group, which shot, bombed, and injured innocent people.
    Then I wouldn't vote Conservative either. Wait until you hear about how under the Conservative Government, the UK security services directly collaborated with loyalist paramilitary groups leading to the deaths of hundreds of people. Probably doesn't count though because something... something... Jeremy Corbyn amirite?

    https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/n...-31261593.html

    Quote Originally Posted by Aexodus View Post
    Abolishing capitalism is an extreme and stupid position.
    I wouldn't take that too seriously if I were you. Even if Labour get a majority (which they won't, too many Gammons voting Tory) they're highly unlikely to abolish capitalism and turn the UK into a full on Marxist Republic. Put the Daily Mail down for a second and come back to reality.

    However the divide between rich and poor is as wide as its ever been and getting wider. Addressing this problem is hardly Maoist...

    Quote Originally Posted by Aexodus View Post
    People who support the IRA support terrorism. People who say bullets and bombs should be used to unite Ireland support terrorism. John McDonnel did both.
    He said something idiotic, which he apologised for.
    .
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics...comment-labour

    Tell me do you hold the DUP politicians to the same standards?

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics...haunts-the-dup

    http://www.irishnews.com/news/2015/1...-links-288278/

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •