Most but for a few of the topic currently going in the ‘pit do not interest me, so to remedy the situation I’ll make a thread. I looked at what was on BBC and the headline was a grim but important subject. Hopefully we won’t screech and posture like I see elsewhere.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49221936
Now, anyone who says this has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment is deluding themselves. You don’t see this for example, happening as much in Canada or in the UK. Now the UK is a much smaller country, but even when you adjust for population size there are much less shootings here.Twenty people have been killed and another 24 injured in a mass shooting in the city of El Paso, Texas Governor Greg Abbott has confirmed.
He described it as one of the deadliest days in the state's history.
The massacre happened at a Walmart store near the Cielo Vista Mall, a few miles from the US-Mexican border.
A 21-year-old man is in custody and is believed to be the sole gunman. Mr Abbott praised the police officers who apprehended him.
The suspect has been named by US media as Patrick Crusius, a resident of the Dallas area.
Obviously more guns in circulation means more opportunity to shoot people. That’s just a statistical fact. But I don’t think it means that there will inevitably be mass murders. A discussion I find more interesting is why were there less mass shootings in the decades before the 90s, when gun laws in the US were either the same or more liberal than they are today.