View Poll Results: What units should be optional?

2. You may not vote on this poll
  • Elite versions of the units (Sentinels, Hawkeyes, High Helms)

    0 0%
  • Female version of base units (Spear Sisters, Bow Sisters)

    0 0%
  • Elite female units (spear maiden, bow maden, dual swords maiden, two handed spear maiden)

    1 50.00%
  • Unicorn Maiden

    1 50.00%
  • Pegasi Maiden

    1 50.00%
  • Griffon Raiders

    1 50.00%
  • Generic shadow warriors (with the hood, recruitable outside of Naggarythe)

    0 0%
  • Swordmen

    0 0%
  • Pikemen

    0 0%
  • Generic version of special units (Axemen, Swordmasters, Heavy Chariot)

    0 0%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: What units should be optional?

  1. #1
    Steph's Avatar Maréchal de France
    Patrician Artifex

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Pont de l'Arn, France

    Default What units should be optional?

    SWO-RD includes some new units, which are not completly lore friendly, although I tried to make them lore compatible.

    I have created a poll here to get some feedback about the unit, and see if their a strong demand to make them optional.

  2. #2

    Default Re: What units should be optional?

    I personally voted for Pegasi, Unicorn Maidens and Griffon Raiders, because though there are lore options for lord / hero mounts, ful regiments of these unis feel like they are part of "End Times" narrative like

    I really like extensive overhaul You have done with roster of High Elves and quality of re texture of shield symbols .

    Only one suggestion is if possible to differentiate Lord and Prince from other characters since lot of units use their assets (Helmets , armor, shields) and now they lack uniqueness.

    Into the fires of battle, unto the anvil of war!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts