The Great Replacement ''Conspiracy Theory'' vs The Emerging Democratic Majority

[Basil II the B.S]

You realize they're not getting replaced, right? That's not the proper definition of ethnic cleansing by the way. Quite frankly, arguing for a homogeneous white state is far closer to an ethnic cleansing than normal migration flows.



There is no overarching policy of forced migration.

Whites aren't getting deported in favor of minorities. So no, there is no ethnic cleansing.

Liberalism 101:
-ethnically replacing white people in every single country where they are a majoirty is not ethnic cleansing;
-keeping homogenous white countries as they are is ethnic replacement;

The liberal agenda is an agenda of genocide. The future of the Westen world is a genocidal war: liberals against white people.

[Love Mountain]

Liberalism 101:
-ethnically replacing white people in every single country where they are a majoirty is not ethnic cleansing;

How many white American citizens have we deported?

-keeping homogenous white countries as they are is ethnic replacement;

Most countries are not white homogeneous countries. Moreover, even among "white" countries, there are significant differences. A Russian has about as much in common with a Frenchman as he does with a Turk.

The liberal agenda is an agenda of genocide. The future of the Westen world is a genocidal war: liberals against white people.

Why don't you show us a program or system that aims to slaughter or deport white people out of their native lands?

[Basil II the B.S]

Most European countries were 99% white until your side took over and started ethnically replacing white people. A crime that liberals will be held responsible for.

[Love Mountain]

Most European countries were 99% white until your side took over and started ethnically replacing white people. A crime that liberals will be held responsible for.

When's the exact date, and how many white people have died so far?

[Basil II the B.S]

Good question. How many white people were killed by immigrants invited by liberals in the West since 1945? How many were raped? Robbed? Because a good way to settle this issue would be to hold liberals responsible for this mess. Eg, the recent murders in Germany by refugees: just make liberals pay for them. Your husband was stabbed by a refugee? Refugee Welcome organizations repay you €100 mil. for ruining your life. Very simple.

On a side note, this is an interesting thing:
UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous People.
Article 8
1. Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.2. States shall provide effective mechanisms for prevention of, and redress for:(a) Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic identities;(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources;(c) Any form of forced population transfer which has the aim or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;(d) Any form of forced assimilation or integra-tion;(e) Any form of propaganda designed to pro-mote or incite racial or ethnic discrimination directed against them

Guess who is indigenous of Europe?

Any action which has the aim or effect. Effect. How many time do I have underline the word effect? A policy that Mongrel, Spartan and Sukiyama advocate and defend and has the effect of depriving the various people of Europe of their ethnic identity is a criminal act. This entire thread shows liberals arguing for a criminal policy against the distinct people of Europe, disposessing them in effect of their land and identity. Once again, the future is liberalism against humanity.

[Love Mountain]

Good question. How many white people were killed by immigrants invited by liberals in the West since 1945?

How many were raped? Robbed? Because a good way to settle this issue would be to hold liberals responsible for this mess. Eg, the recent murders in Germany by refugees: just make liberals pay for them. Your husband was stabbed by a refugee? Refugee Welcome organizations repay you €100 mil. for ruining your life. Very simple.

Well...? Do tell us your theory. Go on.

[Basil II the B.S]

What? You already stated that:
1) White majority countries should be repopulated with immigrants via replacement migration and that does not constitute ethnic cleansing.
2) Keeping indigenous white countries as such may constitute an ethnic cleansing of immigrants.

Which is the standard liberal position: if you are white, you are obligated to go extinct. You do not have a right to a nation, to an ethnic identity or a land. Your obligation is to be multicultural and accept immigration, anything less is ''ethnic cleansing''. Obviously this is not the case for anyone else that can celebrate and retain their identity.

[Love Mountain]

What? You already stated that:
1) White majority countries should be repopulated with immigrants via replacement migration and that does not constitute ethnic cleansing.

Why don't you show us evidence for this plot of re-population.

2) Keeping indigenous white countries as such may constitute an ethnic cleansing of immigrants.

America is a diverse country. Attempting to make America into a homogeneous white state, would in fact be ethnic cleansing of foreign born.

Which is the standard liberal position: if you are white, you are obligated to go extinct. You do not have a right to a nation, to an ethnic identity or a land. Your obligation is to be multicultural and accept immigration, anything less is ''ethnic cleansing''. Obviously this is not the case for anyone else that can celebrate and retain their identity.

There are more white people in Europe and United States now, than ever before in history. In what way are they going extinct?

[Aexodus]

Imma leave this here and walk away

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine...merica/307208/

For some, the disappearance of this centrifugal core heralds a future rich with promise. In 1998, President Bill Clinton, in a now-famous address to students at Portland State University, remarked:

Today, largely because of immigration, there is no majority race in Hawaii or Houston or New York City. Within five years, there will be no majority race in our largest state, California. In a little more than 50 years, there will be no majority race in the United States. No other nation in history has gone through demographic change of this magnitude in so short a time ... [These immigrants] are energizing our culture and broadening our vision of the world. They are renewing our most basic values and reminding us all of what it truly means to be American.

[Basil II the B.S]

America is a diverse country. Attempting to make America into a homogeneous white state, would in fact be ethnic cleansing of foreign born.

White majority. Sukiyama already engaging in writing off white people from America. Not surprising, given the previous post and the following bs.

Why don't you show us evidence for this plot of re-population.

There are more white people in Europe and United States now, than ever before in history. In what way are they going extinct?

Dishonest game of static vs dinamic. Let me kick your dishonest argument right in the teeth as it deserves and leave it to a bloody pulp.
Is the current demographic of Europe or the US going to stay the same? Answer is, and you know this, just highlight the depth of the intellectual dishonesty of your post, no.

The fertility rates of white people in both the US and Western Europe is below the 2.1 require replacement level. Meaning that it shrinks every generation, the speed of the shrinkage depending on what's the fertility rate, but that changes for every country. Let's go with places like Italy or Germany which have a 1.4 roughly. That means that the local population shrinks by 1/3 for every generation.

So, what is the liberal (your side) solution? Well, simply repopulate Europe and North America with people from Africa (mainly) and Asia. But since your side hates white people, that's obviously not enough. The currenty level of migration, which your side also wants to increase, is enough to make the population grow. So, you have white majority countries that would naturally shrink... that are instead growing.
Meaning that in the dynamic scenario, countries that, as you said, have more white people than ever, will see their white side shrink and eventually go exctinct, replaced and repopulated by others.

Obviously, you don't want white people to find out. This is why you, Mongrel and Spartan are so eager to censor the word replacement. Mostly because nobody likes to be replaced. But for the liberal agenda, getting ride of white people is a necessary condition of the post-racial utopia. So, white people will be first reduced to minority in their own countries (see the US, you already are writing it out as ''diverse'' when it used to be a strong white majority one) and then due to their birthrates will simply go extinct. Obviously, most white people do not want to go extinct either, but here it's pretty obvious that the goal of your post is to prevent the achievement of conciousness. Anyone who sees the trend and is intellectually honest about the numbers, understand the problem. You? You immediately go for denial.

You even went as far as claiming that white countries being repopulated by non-whites is not ethnic cleansing, while objecting to such fate is actually ethnic cleansing. So it's pretty clear the game you, Spartan and Mongrel are playing. I simply call it out as it is. It is not only a humongous violation of the human rights of white people, it's a criminal agenda. It's a denial of the right to exist and cultivate your own ethnic identity, mixed with an Orwellian agenda of doublethink, denial, derailing and it can only work so long that your side maintains complete control of the narrative. If people see, they disagree, thus they can't see. They must be prevented to see.

That's the level of depth of evil. Smash the fash? I just delivered to your Marxist agenda a baseball bat to the teeth and that's just the beginning. People have noticed they are being replaced. You will be stopped.

[Love Mountain]

White majority. Sukiyama already engaging in writing off white people from America. Not surprising, given the previous post and the following bs.

In what way is America not a diverse country? Even 20 years ago?

Dishonest game of static vs dinamic. Let me kick your dishonest argument right in the teeth as it deserves and leave it to a bloody pulp.
Is the current demographic of Europe or the US going to stay the same? Answer is, and you know this, just highlight the depth of the intellectual dishonesty of your post, no.

On what basis should it stay the same? When a Sicilian moor has a baby with a Swedish model, are the babies allows to be in Sweden or Sicily? Or should they be shipped off to North Africa?

The fertility rates of white people in both the US and Western Europe is below the 2.1 require replacement level. Meaning that it shrinks every generation, the speed of the shrinkage depending on what's the fertility rate, but that changes for every country. Let's go with places like Italy or Germany which have a 1.4 roughly. That means that the local population shrinks by 1/3 for every generation.

So, what is the liberal (your side) solution? Well, simply repopulate Europe and North America with people from Africa (mainly) and Asia. But since your side hates white people, that's obviously not enough. The currenty level of migration, which your side also wants to increase, is enough to make the population grow. So, you have white majority countries that would naturally shrink... that are instead growing.
Meaning that in the dynamic scenario, countries that, as you said, have more white people than ever, will see their white side shrink and eventually go exctinct, replaced and repopulated by others.

Obviously, you don't want white people to find out. This is why you, Mongrel and Spartan are so eager to censor the word replacement. Mostly because nobody likes to be replaced. But for the liberal agenda, getting ride of white people is a necessary condition of the post-racial utopia. So, white people will be first reduced to minority in their own countries (see the US, you already are writing it out as ''diverse'' when it used to be a strong white majority one) and then due to their birthrates will simply go extinct. Obviously, most white people do not want to go extinct either, but here it's pretty obvious that the goal of your post is to prevent the achievement of conciousness. Anyone who sees the trend and is intellectually honest about the numbers, understand the problem. You? You immediately go for denial.

Why don't you show us documents, events, and most importantly, evidence of collaboration or ideological adherence along the relevant time period and in relevant countries? In this case, I'm assuming the liberal agenda spans the entirety of Europe and North America.

You even went as far as claiming that white countries being repopulated by non-whites is not ethnic cleansing, while objecting to such fate is actually ethnic cleansing. So it's pretty clear the game you, Spartan and Mongrel are playing. I simply call it out as it is. It is not only a humongous violation of the human rights of white people, it's a criminal agenda. It's a denial of the right to exist and cultivate your own ethnic identity, mixed with an Orwellian agenda of doublethink, denial, derailing and it can only work so long that your side maintains complete control of the narrative. If people see, they disagree, thus they can't see. They must be prevented to see.

Because it's not? Repopulation implies that a population has been removed or reduced, but that's not the case. Tell me Basil, since you refused to ask the question, if there is a conspiracy to reduce the number of white people, why are there more white people than ever before?

That's the level of depth of evil. Smash the fash? I just delivered to your Marxist agenda a baseball bat to the teeth and that's just the beginning. People have noticed they are being replaced. You will be stopped.

Just 5 years ago I was accused of being either a neoliberal or a Russian shill. I'm betting in 10 years you'll be accusing me of harboring a fascist jewish agenda, or something of the sort.

[Basil II the B.S]

To be fair, my only mistake was not sticking to my own rules. I forgot I was ignoring you for the thread and that's mainly because you don't want a honest discussion (see post in the first page).

You seem to legitimately believe that if you repeat a dishonest argument long enough, it makes it true. See the bs about ''more white people than ever before''. That's easily dismissable by checking birthrates as I said and you still repeat it. Unfortunately for you, it doesn't make it true. I just have better things to do, for instance further denouncing the unmitigated evil of your side's agenda.

Though these conversations certainly convince me of the necessity of nuclear weapons to protect white people from liberals with your ideas. If those don't bring you to reason, then to the very least they'll protect us.

[mongrel]

White majority. Sukiyama already engaging in writing off white people from America. Not surprising, given the previous post and the following bs.




Dishonest game of static vs dinamic. Let me kick your dishonest argument right in the teeth as it deserves and leave it to a bloody pulp.
Is the current demographic of Europe or the US going to stay the same? Answer is, and you know this, just highlight the depth of the intellectual dishonesty of your post, no.

The fertility rates of white people in both the US and Western Europe is below the 2.1 require replacement level. Meaning that it shrinks every generation, the speed of the shrinkage depending on what's the fertility rate, but that changes for every country. Let's go with places like Italy or Germany which have a 1.4 roughly. That means that the local population shrinks by 1/3 for every generation.

So, what is the liberal (your side) solution? Well, simply repopulate Europe and North America with people from Africa (mainly) and Asia. But since your side hates white people, that's obviously not enough. The currenty level of migration, which your side also wants to increase, is enough to make the population grow. So, you have white majority countries that would naturally shrink... that are instead growing.
Meaning that in the dynamic scenario, countries that, as you said, have more white people than ever, will see their white side shrink and eventually go exctinct, replaced and repopulated by others.

Obviously, you don't want white people to find out. This is why you, Mongrel and Spartan are so eager to censor the word replacement. Mostly because nobody likes to be replaced. But for the liberal agenda, getting ride of white people is a necessary condition of the post-racial utopia. So, white people will be first reduced to minority in their own countries (see the US, you already are writing it out as ''diverse'' when it used to be a strong white majority one) and then due to their birthrates will simply go extinct. Obviously, most white people do not want to go extinct either, but here it's pretty obvious that the goal of your post is to prevent the achievement of conciousness. Anyone who sees the trend and is intellectually honest about the numbers, understand the problem. You? You immediately go for denial.

You even went as far as claiming that white countries being repopulated by non-whites is not ethnic cleansing, while objecting to such fate is actually ethnic cleansing. So it's pretty clear the game you, Spartan and Mongrel are playing. I simply call it out as it is. It is not only a humongous violation of the human rights of white people, it's a criminal agenda. It's a denial of the right to exist and cultivate your own ethnic identity, mixed with an Orwellian agenda of doublethink, denial, derailing and it can only work so long that your side maintains complete control of the narrative. If people see, they disagree, thus they can't see. They must be prevented to see.

That's the level of depth of evil. Smash the fash? I just delivered to your Marxist agenda a baseball bat to the teeth and that's just the beginning. People have noticed they are being replaced. You will be stopped.

Censor the word replacement? What about the words daft, moronic and terrorist? People following this cult murder people for a racist myth invented by a neo-Nazi decades ago. Of course we don't want white people to become poisoned by this and go on to kill more innocents for no reason. Sensible white people mock Replacement Theory and are repelled by its terrorist antics. Also I don't have the same 'ethnic identity' as some Italian version of Roderick Spode, I'm Irish and not part of a fascist hive mind.

You will be stopped you say? Is that a threat, is this a manifesto prior to a shooting, should someone hide the keys to the truck?

Most European countries were 99% white until your side took over and started ethnically replacing white people. A crime that liberals will be held responsible for.

Lies. I have already proven that for the UK. You have seen the Cabinet Office discussions and legislation.

Arguments getting repetitive?

Your opening post does not accurately address the issue of "the Great Replacement". In fact, you've omitted and refused to discuss the actual theory.

My point entirely. Given that this daft theory is directly responsible for two terrorist attacks in a fortnight (US and Norway) perhaps Basil lacks the ability to do so.

[Love Mountain]

To be fair, my only mistake was not sticking to my own rules. I forgot I was ignoring you for the thread and that's mainly because you don't want a honest discussion (see post in the first page).

Your opening post does not accurately address the issue of "the Great Replacement". In fact, you've omitted and refused to discuss the actual theory.

You seem to legitimately believe that if you repeat a dishonest argument long enough, it makes it true. See the bs about ''more white people than ever before''. That's easily dismissable by checking birthrates as I said and you still repeat it. Unfortunately for you, it doesn't make it true. I just have better things to do, for instance further denouncing the unmitigated evil of your side's agenda.

Though these conversations certainly convince me of the necessity of nuclear weapons to protect white people from liberals with your ideas. If those don't bring you to reason, then to the very least they'll protect us.

I didn't make an argument in the last few posts. I've asked you to clarify yours.

[95thrifleman]

How is Britain replacing white people? The only immigration we are "mass importing" is Eastern European, we havn't had any significant black or asian immigration since the windrush generation.

Unless Eastern Europeans are not white? Can't say I've ever met a black pole tbh.

[mongrel]

How is Britain replacing white people? The only immigration we are "mass importing" is Eastern European, we havn't had any significant black or asian immigration since the windrush generation.

Unless Eastern Europeans are not white? Can't say I've ever met a black pole tbh.

And indeed there is a reason for that.

For more details about the UK's migration policy see my Great Replacement roast in the moderation commentary, which lists every law and links to various papers including Cabinet discussions on the policy to exclude black migration as far as possible, the exact opposite of this daft theory. Basil knows of it. His response is to pretend it doesn't exist, like that ape Dr Zaius near the end of the Planet of the Apes movie, who upon seeing proof of human civilisation, decides to supress it.

In passing, I've seen infant mixed-race Poles.

Now on that cult.....

This is what Great Replacement is about:

The El Paso, the shooter who murdered 22 people posted a manifesto online explicitly stating his motivation: he was trying to stop a “Hispanic invasion of Texas”.


Another shooter attacked a synagogue in Poway, California, killing one woman . In his manifesto, he claimed he was responding to the “meticulously planned genocide of the European race”.

In Pittsburgh , October 2018still another shooter online said that they were trying to “bring invaders in that kill our people”.


And we musn't forget Christchurch , where the shooter explained Great Replacement theory was in a way the OP avoided. The man who murdered 51 people called immigration an “assault on the European people”. This in a country where every white person is an immigrant, or descended from one.

Does this language sound familiar?

Stop pussying around Basil, Replacement Theory is a violent cult. You are bordering on promoting terrorism. There is no getting around it.

[95thrifleman]

Wasn't Texas settled by the mexicans/spainish? So, leaving aside native Americans for the moment, are not Hispanics the guys being replaced by whites under Basil's theory anyway?

[Cope]

The only immigration we are "mass importing" is Eastern European, we havn't had any significant black or asian immigration since the windrush generation.

Unless Eastern Europeans are not white? Can't say I've ever met a black pole tbh.

This is an invention of your own mind.

Between 2004 and 2017, the non-EU foreign born population of the United Kingdom rose by ~2m (~3.0% of the total population); of these ~2m people, the majority came from Asian and African countries, particularly India and Pakistan. This means that from the period from 2004 to 2017, the non-EU foreign born population rose, in real terms, at a similar rate to the EU born population.

[sumskilz]

Wasn't Texas settled by the mexicans/spainish? So, leaving aside native Americans for the moment, are not Hispanics the guys being replaced by whites under Basil's theory anyway?

It was Spanish claimed territory and then part of Mexico for 15 years, but it was never really settled by "Hispanics". In 1823, two years after independence, the new Mexican government offered land grants to immigrants from the United States in order to settle the place, which turned out to be a mistake. Various conflicts arose with the Americans who quickly outnumbered anyone who considered themselves Mexican to the point that only seven years later Mexico outlawed immigration from the US, but of course it was too late. In 1838, the American immigrants declared independence setting the stage for the Mexican–American War.

[95thrifleman]

And 3% is somehow an invasion of genocidal murderers trying to wipe out the white race?

https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures....d-wales/latest

Oh the horror! The UK is only 86% white, we are doomed, these ebil non-white will cut our throats while we sleep, we are outnumbered, dying out, who will save our poor white skins from the dark hued apocalypse?