Conservative Americans and cosmopolitan liberals are talking about the same thing. Narrative, however, matters. What someone wants and likes might be the opposite of what the other wants and likes. This is the typical case when it comes to immigration. A good way to silence opposite opinions is to frame them as conspiracy theories while at the same time openly celebrating the very same thing, so long that's presented under a positive light.
Let us see the case at hand:
Can the Democrats Still Count on a Demographic Advantage?
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/...advantage.html
This is a pretty good introductory piece, because it's an interview with one of the original theorists of the Democratic open borders agenda, Rui Teixeira, author of ''The Emerging Democratic Majority'' influential book. The core thesis of the book is that non-white immigration would erode the numbers of the working-middle class whites, a the ''diverse'' coalition would guarantee a one-party rule for the decades to come.
Teixeira still argues in favour of the theory and recently wrote ''The Optimistic Leftist: Why the 21st Century Will Be Better Than You Think''.
Noteworthy to mention, in the book he argued about trying to retain the white working class vote.This has abundantly failed. The white working class has become the dead horse that upper class white liberals love to beat in their free time on social media. Hillary Clinton herself described it a ''basket of deplorables'', shortly before crashing against the beautiful Rust Belt Wall built by the white working class to keep her from becoming President. Nonetheless, the white working class is topic of another one of Teixeira's book. He also mentions that his theory would backfire in case Hispanics would start identifying themselves as part of the ''white'' group, something there are some signs of.
In 2012 he wrote an update of his theory:
The Emerging Democratic Majority Turns 10
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...rns-10/265005/
Further media coverage:
Permanent Democratic Majority: New Study Says Yes
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/peman...major_n_186257
Can Democrats Count on Demographic Shifts to Put Them Back in Power?
https://www.thenation.com/article/ca...back-in-power/
The Democratic demographic advantage is real and growing
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/worl...l-and-growing/
Slate has a surprisingly honest (for the most part) article about it as well:
The Coming Democratic Majority? Not So Fast.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...you-think.html
Progressive think thank:
America’s Electoral Future
https://www.americanprogress.org/iss...oral-future-2/
Another less optimistic (for Dems) article:
Are Democrats being too smug about their demographic advantages?
https://newrepublic.com/minutes/1278...hic-advantages
Which leads to one of my points. To paraphrase Bill Maher, if you tell people they are going to become a minority too often, they'll start voting like one.
From ''How Democracies Die'':
Lots of meat to roast:The simple fact of the matter is that the world has never built a multiethnic democracy in which no particular ethnic group is in the majority and where political equality, social equality and economies that empower all have been achieved.
- the fundamental hypocrisy of liberals, trying to censor dissenting opinion and killing democratic discussion, so that their own opinion is the only one accepted; this is particularly dangerous because the goal here is to simply get away with democracy;
-their own theory might as well not work out as intended and backfire in possible ways:potential loss of the Hispanic vote (here continous immigration helps the Dem case), actual loss of the white working class vote but also social breakdown along ethnic lines;
-the attempt to build a society that ultimately has never shown a chance to be successful; here the best comparison would be the United Nations Assembly, where every group has one vote. Indeed almost nothing ever gets done.
-finally, the fact that Dems would like a society with strong redistributive policies, but those exist only in countries with very high social cohesion and that's correlated with high ethnic homogeneity, hence why the US is not going to have an European style welfare state;
https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/al...-alesina11.pdf
You can pick any of the above topic to discuss.