Bugs & Issues for 3.5

[theharkonnen]

Found a bug (Maybe):

I reported in another threat that two of Jiaozhou's westernmost cities start with -100% religion.

A similar problem exists for Henan (Which I plan on doing a campaign for). Both their starting cities begin with -100% religion.

[Gigantus]

Wucheng (C-0306-b-LeLing) has 110 total religion percentage in descr_regions
Linhuai (C-0704-b-ZhanChun) = 120

That requires correcting - where those the settlements you meant?

[theharkonnen]

Sorry, I forgot to list the cities.

For Henan, the cities are:

1) C-0803-a-HeNei

2) C-0804-a-HeDong

These cities are split between dynastic change and revival, but Henan is neither.

For Jiaozhou, the cities are:

1) C-1418-b-LinJiang (Longbian)

2) C-1412-b-Hanjia (Hepu)

These two cities are 100% revival currently.

I also found the same issue with Chen's only city:

1) C-0710-a-WuYin

This city has dynastic change, factionism and daoist revolution. But Chen is revival.

This may explain why these factions don't expand very much in the early game. Jiaozhou does, since two are their cities are positive, but Chen and Henan do not seem to as much.

[Seether]

I fixed the top two, but didn’t see Chen. Will make sure to fix that.

[theharkonnen]

Error in 4.0:

The Huang Quan that spawns for Liu Bei is set to Normans?

[Seether]

Whoops

[theharkonnen]

I am still noticing voice issues with diplomats and princesses saying things like "England bids you welcome".

Diplomats also seem to be confused when it comes to trade deals. Even when I accept, the diplomat's voice gets mad like I rejected it.

Was playing as Cao and noticed Chen's princess did this.

Not game breaking but still...