After reading this article:
https://www.spiegel.de/international...a-1269597.html
im even more sure, its social caused.
After reading this article:
https://www.spiegel.de/international...a-1269597.html
im even more sure, its social caused.
Cause tomorrow is a brand-new day
And tomorrow you'll be on your way
Don't give a damn about what other people say
Because tomorrow is a brand-new day
The best part of it is that he posted it to prove that white people are worse than others. Jesus Christ.
Last edited by Basil II the B.S; June 04, 2019 at 06:04 PM.
Indeed knife attacks (as Conon also stated) require either the element of surprise or skill with knives (else you will end up dead )
In some countries (eg Argentina) there was a culture of knife fights (eg Borges mentions it in many of his short stories). In the Uk it is just used for ordinary, petty crime and not as much for showmanship i suppose.
But use of acid in the Uk is not only about making a hit (sometimes people throw acid on moped riders, to steal the moped; quite gloomy for London or anywhere else), it also happens when the person wants to humiliate their enemy. Gangs mostly do it, but it isn't always gang-on-gang crime.
OK not a few dollars that a was bit of understatement but there is a ton evidence that you kinda find college kids or hard up retires who drive down to say Virginia and back and buy guns. You need people with clean records. I'll see if I can find a good link. But the cycle is organized crime and gangs can find marks to for not all that much money get the guns and then pass them on be nobody wants to holding a hot gun if they used it.
No given history they likely just have opportunity to participate in medical malpractice and financial fraud and much higher rate.The best part of it is that he posted it to prove that white people are worse than others. Jesus Christ.
Last edited by conon394; June 04, 2019 at 07:14 PM.
IN PATROCINIVM SVB Dromikaites
'One day when I fly with my hands - up down the sky, like a bird'
But if the cause be not good, the king himself hath a heavy reckoning to make, when all those legs and arms and heads, chopped off in battle, shall join together at the latter day and cry all 'We died at such a place; some swearing, some crying for surgeon, some upon their wives left poor behind them, some upon the debts they owe, some upon their children rawly left.
Hyperides of Athens: We know, replied he, that Antipater is good, but we (the Demos of Athens) have no need of a master at present, even a good one.
Absolute nonsense.
Population of London (Census 2011):
White British (44.9%)
Other White (14.9%)
Asian British (18.4%)
Black British (13.3%)
Arab British (1.3%)
Mixed (5%)
Other (2.2%)
15.6 per cent of London's population are of Black and mixed-Black descent. 13.3 per cent are of full Black descent, with those of mixed-Black heritage comprising 2.3 per cent. Black Africans account for 7.0 per cent of London's population, with 4.2 per cent as Black Caribbean and 2.1 per cent as "Other Black". 5.0 per cent are of mixed race.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London
Those 13,3 % Black British consist of 7,00 % Black Africans, 4,2 % Black Caribbean and 2,1 % other Blacks ( 2,3% mixed Black Descent).
The African Caribbeans are also only 3 times over represented. Not 8 times.
But as Gang Criminality is defined by the Met Police with:
A gang is defined as "a relatively durable, predominantly street-based group of young people who see themselves [and are seen by others] as a discernible group, and engage in a range of criminal activity and violence".
So we should take a look at the relevant age group in London, shouldn't we?
Across London, Black and Asian children outnumber White British children by about six to four in state schools.[246] Altogether at the 2011 census, of London's 1,624,768 population aged 0 to 15, 46.4 per cent were White, 19.8 per cent were Asian, 19 per cent were Black, 10.8 per cent were Mixed and 4 per cent represented another ethnic group.[247]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London
So Black British are only two times overrepresented now.
Now we take a look were the ethnics live, as we know, gangs are "street-based".
Whites
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Blacks:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
As everybody can see, blacks and whites live in different districts of London.
In some of this districts Blacks are more than 40 % of the inhabitants, so its total normal, that gangs of this districts consisted in majority of Black British and commit 38 % of those acid crimes.
I'm certain those are the poorest districts without any social infrastructure (youth clubs) (broken neighbourhood).
So acid crimes have nothing to do with black skin or black culture. Nothing more than racistic bs propaganda.
This argument is even more ridiculous, as they are british citizens, born in UK and not in Africa or Jamaica.
And the good news at last:
Gang crime is gone down 50 %
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-45189359
Last edited by Morticia Iunia Bruti; June 04, 2019 at 09:50 PM.
Cause tomorrow is a brand-new day
And tomorrow you'll be on your way
Don't give a damn about what other people say
Because tomorrow is a brand-new day
Absolutley Barking, Mudpit Mutt Former Patron: Garbarsardar
"Out of the crooked tree of humanity,no straight thing can be made." Immanuel Kant
"Oh Yeah? What about a cricket bat? That's pretty straight. Just off the top of my head..." Al Murray, Pub Landlord.
That comes out to @60% as Mithradates said.
Does "African Caribbean"= "Black British" or "Black Carribean"?Asian British (18.4%)
Black British (13.3%)
Arab British (1.3%)
Mixed (5%)
Other (2.2%)
15.6 per cent of London's population are of Black and mixed-Black descent. 13.3 per cent are of full Black descent, with those of mixed-Black heritage comprising 2.3 per cent. Black Africans account for 7.0 per cent of London's population, with 4.2 per cent as Black Caribbean and 2.1 per cent as "Other Black". 5.0 per cent are of mixed race.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London
Those 13,3 % Black British consist of 7,00 % Black Africans, 4,2 % Black Caribbean and 2,1 % other Blacks ( 2,3% mixed Black Descent).
The African Caribbeans are also only 3 times over represented. Not 8 times.
Black British = African Caribbean.
Cause tomorrow is a brand-new day
And tomorrow you'll be on your way
Don't give a damn about what other people say
Because tomorrow is a brand-new day
Are you sure? Following your wikipedia source:
"The term has sometimes been used to include UK residents solely of African origin or as a term to define all Black British residents, though the phrase African and Caribbean has more often been used to cover such a broader grouping. The most common and traditional use of the term African-Caribbean community is in reference to groups of residents continuing aspects of Caribbean culture, customs and traditions in the UK."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britis...ribbean_people
Yes, i am, as the Met police statistics don't differentiate between African Black or Caribbean Black, its all count under "Black":
Lee Bridges, Professor Emeritus (School of Law, University of Warwick), examines the ethnic composition of the Metropolitan police’s gangs database.
In October 2014, the Met police disclosed information[1] on the ethnic composition of its ‘Gangs Matrix’ or database, showing that no fewer than 78.2 per cent of 3,422 persons then included were classified as black and a further 8.7 per cent from other minority ethnic communities. The full ethnic breakdown was as follows:
It is interesting to note how ethnicity is defined. While four of the six categories are geographically based, with ‘whites’ being divided between Northern and Southern European origins, no such differentiation is made for either ‘black’ or ‘Asian’ people on the database, both being taken as blanket categories based purely on race or ethnicity.
But what is even more remarkable is that the Met could claim that there are only 439 white people in the whole of London who are engaged on an organised basis in ‘violence, criminal offending and gang membership’, which is the purported basis for inclusion on the database. Once account is taken of such organised criminal activities as drug-dealing; sex and people trafficking; multi-handed robbery: fraud: theft (including auto theft) and extortion; football hooliganism; and racist violence, these figures are simply not credible.
http://www.irr.org.uk/news/the-met-g...ism-in-action/
Cause tomorrow is a brand-new day
And tomorrow you'll be on your way
Don't give a damn about what other people say
Because tomorrow is a brand-new day
I love how this thread turned out to be. So many posts are complete own goals uncovering stats that the left stays away as much as they can because it dismantles their narrative, then followed by hyperventilating posts that try to minimize the damage.
It's amusing to see that the conservatives always miss the blindingly obvious. Let me spell it out for you...
Your Tory Gods decided in their infinite wisdom to cut the police budget.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...report-reveals
https://www.independent.co.uk/topic/...MP=ILC-refresh
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/new...jKvP9cPLT5gyYw
Violent crime then rose as a result. But yeah, you lot continue blaming the Mayor, or black people, or whatever distracts you from the simple truth...
But I hate the Conservative party. I even call them Cuckservative..
Regardless, crime is correlated with low social cohesion. Not so much police forces. Plenty of cities waste great amounts of resources on the police, but they have low social cohesion and thus achieve little. This is very common for instance in Sub-Saharian Africa. Large urban conglomerates like London also have the same issue, but also New York, for the same reason. Parallel societies developed along tribal lines, different value sets and often religious boundaries. In short, what you call ''multicultural society'' in the end results in a complete breakdown of society into microcosms relying on tribal belonging. Outside that, noone trusts anyone.
This is actually the most notorious study:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/...7.2007.00176.x
Mostly because Putnam is a liberal in favour of diversity and didn't really like the results of his research, thus postponed it for a bit, hoping to find a solution. Regardless, ethno-cultural diversity is strongly correlated with low trust in neighbours, media, political leadership, but also participation in protests, lack of friends, spending time watching tv.
And that's the US. The most diverse societies are unsurprisingly in Sub-Saharian Africa, to the point that someone advanced the argument that what actually hinders development over there is indeed too much diversity and tribalism. This seems to find confirmation in the fact that the most cohese societies are.... in East Asia, aka the most homogenous ones like Japan, Korea and China. Does Japan waste infinite amounts of money on police? Not at all.
Last edited by Basil II the B.S; June 05, 2019 at 04:01 AM.
IN PATROCINIVM SVB Dromikaites
'One day when I fly with my hands - up down the sky, like a bird'
But if the cause be not good, the king himself hath a heavy reckoning to make, when all those legs and arms and heads, chopped off in battle, shall join together at the latter day and cry all 'We died at such a place; some swearing, some crying for surgeon, some upon their wives left poor behind them, some upon the debts they owe, some upon their children rawly left.
Hyperides of Athens: We know, replied he, that Antipater is good, but we (the Demos of Athens) have no need of a master at present, even a good one.
Clodia started posting race/crime statistics thinking that 32% of crime being committed by white people proved white people commit a lot of acid attacks and the issue wasn't cultural/ethnic. Then when multiple guys pointed out that London is 60% white, meaning that despite being 60% of the population, white people commit only 32% of the crime in question, things started falling apart in the narrative. Especially when given the statistic: despite being only 13% of the London population, blacks commit 38% of all acid attacks.
And now he's trying to minimize that complete up with ''yes ok but they are only twice more represented if we exclude non-British blacks''. Rofl.
Last edited by Basil II the B.S; June 05, 2019 at 05:35 AM.
Acid was what killed the parrot?
I wasn't claiming that acid attacks are characteristically done by minorities. I merely noted that it is a phenomenon which does have far more prominence in London, afaik, than in the rest of Europe.
I do hope it has gone down, because an acid attack can literally happen to anyone and can ruin a life in a few seconds...
Afaik (i don't have stats, so i am not saying this as a 'this is how it is') use of acid when done by some minorities is done for different reason (""honor"" attack, eg to have revenge against an ex girlfriend/boyfriend or similar) than when done by youth gang members. And most of the acid attacks in London seem to be of the gang-crime type.