so what, we all know the goddamn answer already. its not arab-israelis or druze or whatever that are far and away the most likely to hold american-israeli dual citizenship. this pedantry is so dumb.
Clearly, white is more than just a skin tone. As the Pollard example proves, just because they haven't finished filing their paperwork does not mean de facto israelis aren't working for their home country. Spreading hatred against the majority ethnicity of the United States is the act of an enemy and they should be treated as such, no matter what citizenship they hold for the sake of convenience. This is already US policy when it comes to muslims, as we saw when Obama vaporized American citizen Anwar al-Awlaki. The same should apply to israeli sayanim.
Last edited by Caduet; August 08, 2019 at 08:37 PM.
Absolutley Barking, Mudpit Mutt Former Patron: Garbarsardar
"Out of the crooked tree of humanity,no straight thing can be made." Immanuel Kant
"Oh Yeah? What about a cricket bat? That's pretty straight. Just off the top of my head..." Al Murray, Pub Landlord.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Fischer
IQ doesn't mean "things mongrel agrees with".
So what? The so what is that I asked Papay who Papay was referring to. Unless you are Papay your answer for him means nothing.
Even here with your who is "most likely to hold american-israeli dual citizenship" does not answer the question. He did not say 'they are most likely', he said "most of them" are. Still want to know who this mysterious them is.
Make a public post, expect a public reply. You only want papay in on this? PM him or invite him to the fight club. Besides, your question is specious. As the Pollard example proves, anyone with the ability to make aliyah is a de facto israeli citizen. It does not matter if they openly declare loyalty to israel. Pollard didn't and look how that ended up. He CHOSE not to declare his loyalty to israel in order hurt America as much as he could for israel's sake.
Some more evidence from israelis proving they are not white (extreme cringe alert):
Last edited by Caduet; August 08, 2019 at 11:12 PM.
These Ashkenazi people (or half Ashkenazi in the case of Arquette) are sorely mistaken if they believe they'll be able to choose to be not white when extremist identity politics becomes mainstream. They aren't really much different than the various white "allies" enabling the same BS. They're all about as ridiculous as an Iranian white nationalist.
You're using the wrong stereotype to characterize Pollard. Pollard sold information to China, Taiwan, South Africa, and Israel. He was motivated by money, not loyalty to Israel. He only came up with his being worried about Israel defense as a way of trying to gain leniency and advocates. Pollard was sentenced to life (though with the possibility of parole obviously) via a plea deal. No American citizen has ever been so harshly sentenced for passing information to an ally, but it all makes more sense once Ronald Olive the lead investigator published the full story in 2006.
We had a terrific movie to talk about and you guys ruin it with Jews. Lame and sad.
Most of influential American Jews
Based on the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Return created by Israel in 1950, all jews can apply and become Israeli citizens. Many American Jews have dual nationality because of that law.
So when you say "Most of them have dual nationality both American and Israeli. And have houses in both countries"
Is what you mean: "Most influential American Jews have dual nationality both American and Israeli. And most influential American Jews have houses in both countries"
Or did you mean: "Most American Jews have dual nationality both American and Israeli. And most American Jews have houses in both countries"
I don't really watch new releases anymore, but judging by the trailer it seemed like the "deplorables" were actually the heroes-victims. What am I missing?
Ignore List (to save time):
Exarch, Coughdrop addict
They ed it up. Essentially, they presented the ''deplorables'' as a bunch of unsalvageable racists that someone might want to get rid of. They didn't realize that for pretty much who's not a liberal, saying mean things of twitter is not a crime that should be punished with a brutal murder by moralistic elites.
Kinda why I wanted it to be released. It reminds me of the Cathy Newman interview, where Channel 4 released the whole thing thinking it'd make her look good, while she actually looked like a bigger moron.
Absolutley Barking, Mudpit Mutt Former Patron: Garbarsardar
"Out of the crooked tree of humanity,no straight thing can be made." Immanuel Kant
"Oh Yeah? What about a cricket bat? That's pretty straight. Just off the top of my head..." Al Murray, Pub Landlord.
The recent antifa terrorist attacks kinda prove Basil's post - perhaps these attacks would never happen if Hollywood and groups like SPLC or CNN have not radicalized the terrorists, that believed that majority of country is populated by "racist nazis" against who physical violence is justified.
I don't recall mainstream media outlets giving positive coverage radicals on the right like they with the ones on the left.
I don't recall how that actually responds to what I said given how it had nothing to with the media, but ok.
They give birth astride of a grave, the light gleams an instant, then it's night once more.
I guess having you jump into a discussion about influence of liberal media on leftist/liberal terrorism with no intention to discuss the subject matter is somehow someone else's fault.