The latest anti-liberal rant thread (get your daily dose here)

[Love Mountain]

I don't even know how to explain this to you in simpler to terms. Look up the term "explanation", I guess.

Look up the actual video and provide the context of Sargon’s argument. Otherwise no, he is justifying horrible when its convenient for his political rhetoric.

[mongrel]

It is nothing since it didn't find me their phone number. The Kiwisearches took 2 minutes for each name. Nothing showed up. If it's possible you should find us something to prove that.

I agree with you. The relationship with Fox News adds weight to the idea that this is just so much .

Apparently expressing the preference that one is not assaulted by those who are classified as migrants/criminals/refugees should, must, and will be punished as wrong think. This holds true even if you were the victim of violent crime at the hands of these sanctified groups. The Italian policy has recently changed for the better, and I am hopeful that if things continue in that vein, I will again be able to visit Rome in the next five years. To tourism conscious Italians I will say this: I will not bother to come back to Rome if high levels of gypsy and African migrants set up trinket shops near major tourist areas. I was assaulted three times and robbed four times the last time I was there.

Guess what? I don't care. These people ruined my experience and if these places want to correct for it they must know. I care 0% for your political correctness.

What daftness is this? There are people out there who prefer to be assualted by non-migrants and people not known to the police etc? Some sort of racist masochism? I thought being not assaulted at all is the default? No reasonable person is going to say 'thank God I got beat up and robbed by some based Proud Boy'. Where would Charles Atlas have been if he thought that it was ok that a chap kicked sand in his face because the offender was white? Is Trump turning the US into a nation of Roderick Spodes?

I don't even know how to explain this to you in simpler to terms. Look up the term "explanation", I guess.

Unlike Sargon's clothes, your argumements don't wash.

[Basil II the B.S]

Good news everyone, I bring you more evidence of White Liberals being racist today:

The latter one is an academic:



Daily reminder that these people are evil. Unsalvageable. They will not be satisfied until every single white, heterosexual, christian conservative is eliminated. It's us or them.

[irontaino]

Searching around for tweets that make you angry...you must have a very fulfilling life.

[Basil II the B.S]

Blaming the messenger, the most typical of liberal tactics.
You see, these hateful tweets get a ton of support among white liberals, so they eventually make it to my page. It's not my fault if bashing white people is the preferred activity of White Liberals on twitter and twitter allows it, because they agree with it. All guilty.

[irontaino]

A lot of conservatives like to (or used to) rail on people for "playing the victim card", yet here you are wanting to be a victim so badly. You make multiple threads screeching about "white genocide" or something stupid like that, and my question is this: why are you so determined to be a victim?

[Basil II the B.S]

We are the victim of the system of oppression created by White Liberals to make white people pay for the crimes that the former committed and still commit. The solution is to rise up against the oppressor and launch a social, economic and cultural war against it, to obtain its complete annihilation.

[irontaino]

What oppression have you suffered? Mean tweets aren't oppression btw, give me an actual example. Why do you wish you were oppressed so badly?

[Basil II the B.S]

Diversity and inclusion policies are specifically about discriminating against straight white males and they are everywhere.

[The spartan]

I don't think that is what he asked.

[Basil II the B.S]

That doesn't mean there isn't a system of oppression against straight white males implemented by white liberals. This is a war they started and we are going to fight it.

[The spartan]

Not necessarily, no. But it does speak to your incredible emotional reactions to policies you have never even witnessed first hand. It makes it feel like there is quite a large disconnect between what you perceive as happening with what is actually happening on the ground. It is like when you go on about how Liberals believe and do these horrible things and then I go out into my every day life and engage with my Liberal friends and acquaintances and they don't say or do any of the things you tell me they do. It almost sounds like wartime propaganda: sure the Germans committed war crimes in 1914 against Belgians, but Entente propaganda hammered that point as hard as they could to depict the Germans overall as literal savages that stick babies on the end of bayonets. You are the British propaganda office in this case.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

[Coughdrop addict]

Daily reminder that these people are evil. Unsalvageable.

People have opinions you may not agree with. This is something everyone deals with everyday, not just you.

They will not be satisfied until every single white, heterosexual, christian conservative is eliminated.

I can prove you wrong. I'm liberal and I don't want white, heterosexual, christian conservatives eliminated. I'd rather you join us in making positive changes in the world. I promise you that recognizing the human dignity of others and feeling empathy for them really isn't that scary.

It's us or them.

Probably not the kind of thing you want to go on record saying since we just had two far-right mass shootings.

[Infidel144]

Probably not the kind of thing you want to go on record saying since we just had two far-right mass shootings.

What "two far-right mass shootings" did we just have?

[Coughdrop addict]

El Paso (white replacement lunatic) and Dayton (incel). Of course the far right is denying it and saying both were false flags. And we can go even further back to see that nearly all of the terrorism in the US in the last few decades has been from the right, from the militia movement to the Oklahoma City Bombing to Al-Qaeda and ISIS to the latest group of spoiled crybabies obsessed with power over others known collectively as the alt-right.

[Infidel144]

El Paso (white replacement lunatic) and Dayton (incel).

Dayton, hmmm....
So a self described leftist, antifa supporting, would be Warren voter who says things such as:
"Kill every fascist,” the shooter declared in 2018 on twitter, echoing a rallying cry of antifa ideologues. Over the next year, his tweets became increasingly violent. “Nazis deserve death and nothing else,” he tweeted last October. Betts frequently flung the label “Nazi” at those with whom he disagreed online"
and
"I want socialism, and I’ll not wait for the idiots to finally come round understanding.” Last week, he promoted posts that demonized Sens. Ted Cruz and Bill Cassidy’s resolution against antifa extremism"
etc is "far right".
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/da...hooter-warren/
https://nypost.com/2019/08/06/dayton...t-mass-killer/

[Basil II the B.S]

Not necessarily, no. But it does speak to your incredible emotional reactions to policies you have never even witnessed first hand. It makes it feel like there is quite a large disconnect between what you perceive as happening with what is actually happening on the ground. It is like when you go on about how Liberals believe and do these horrible things and then I go out into my every day life and engage with my Liberal friends and acquaintances and they don't say or do any of the things you tell me they do. It almost sounds like wartime propaganda: sure the Germans committed war crimes in 1914 against Belgians, but Entente propaganda hammered that point as hard as they could to depict the Germans overall as literal savages that stick babies on the end of bayonets. You are the British propaganda office in this case.

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

My real problem is that I do think that moderate liberals are doing a good job when it comes to keeping their extremists in check. Bret Weinstein on Rogan's podcast made a good point. The problem with his side is that many of the moderates don't like a number of conservatives and thus close an eye when some extremist of their own side starts harassing the latter. Simply on the basis of ''I don't like that guy too much anyway''. You may argue: conservatives aren't doing a great job at keeping Nazis and white supremacists in check, look at Pittsburg/El Paso etc. Ok, fair point. It's extremely hard to keep lone wolves in check. On the other hand, those who fuel polarization on the left actually work for mainstream media, academia and tech. They aren't lone wolves, they work on daily basis to demonize conservatives. Ben Shapiro, whom you might not like, but you can definitely say he's not a Nazi, gets harassed on daily basis and called Nazi by mainstream journalists.

The latter regularly engage with Antifa on social media as well. At least the right knows when to draw the line: no anti-semitism, no racial supremacism. Where does the left draw the line on its side? I just don't see it. You guys whine about my aggressive posting, yet all I do is posting extremists on the left and see you guys... defend them. So there's really no line. You don't see me defending Steve King. Why can't you guys do the same?

[Basil II the B.S]

''Satire''

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/ne...otings-1229829

In the wake of a trio of deadly massacres, the studio is evaluating its strategy for the R-rated Blumhouse satire in which elites stalk "deplorables."

"Did anyone see what our rater-in-chief just did?" one character asks early in the screenplay for The Hunt, a Universal Pictures thriller set to open Sept. 27. Another responds: "At least The Hunt's coming up. Nothing better than going out to the Manor and slaughtering a dozen deplorables."
In the aftermath of mass shootings within days of one another that shocked and traumatized the nation, Universal is re-evaluating its strategy for the certain-to-be-controversial satire. The violent, R-rated film from producer Jason Blum's Blumhouse follows a dozen MAGA types who wake up in a clearing and realize they are being stalked for sport by elite liberals.
Over the Aug. 3 weekend, ESPN pulled an ad for the film that it had previously cleared, while AMC ran the spot during the season premiere of its drama The Preacher. It's unclear whether the ads were identical, but the one yanked by ESPN opened with a sound resembling an emergency broadcast signal. A rep for ESPN parent Disney declined to comment on the move, but an ESPN source says no spots for the film will appear on the network in the coming weeks.

The Hunt stars Betty Gilpin from GLOW and Hilary Swank, representing opposite sides of the political divide. It features guns blazing along with other ultra-violent killings as the elites pick off their prey. The script from Damon Lindelof and Nick Cuse reviewed by The Hollywood Reporter revolves around third-rail political themes. (Original title: Red State Vs. Blue State.)
A studio source says that even before the recent attacks, which left 34 dead in El Paso, Texas; Dayton, Ohio; and Gilroy, California, some reshoots were done based on a recent rough cut. Universal and Blumhouse declined to comment.
While one high-level Universal source says the studio has pulled some ads that are beginning to air and appear online "for content and placement," others say the matter is still under discussion internally. A major ad blitz on television and the web had been planned for the beginning of September, says one insider. A trailer is already online.
Given the fraught political climate — particularly in the wake of the attack in El Paso, which was motivated by anti-immigrant bigotry — studio sources say Universal is evaluating its plans in what one called "a fluid situation." A high-level insider says top executives want to stand by Blum, one of the studio's most prolific and successful producers, as well as filmmaker Craig Zobel, and see the project as a satire addressing an issue of great social importance. But this person says plans could change "if people think we're being exploitative rather than opinionated."
From a business perspective, The Hunt presents a gamble for Universal in these divided times. The satire Assassination Nation, which also pitted the woke versus the unwoke in uber-violent fashion, represented the top sale at Sundance 2018 at $10 million. But the film fizzled upon its release later that year, earning just $2 million with no international rollout. Says one person involved with that film, "We thought people would get the joke."
The Hunt made some executives at Universal skittish back in May 2018, when film chief Donna Langley acquired the script and fast-tracked it at a modest $18 million budget. It is unclear whether there were any other bidders on the property, the sale of which was brokered by CAA, but insiders at several studios told THR at the time that they did not pursue it because of the explosive premise. One executive says he didn't even read the script, noting, "The idea seemed crazy."
This is not the first time a studio has been faced with real-life events that rendered a film release more complicated. Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, for example, Warner Bros. moved back the Arnold Schwarzenegger starrer Collateral Damage and abandoned a trailer that featured a bomb attack in the U.S. The 2017 Death Wish remake was delayed several months in response to a mass shooting in Las Vegas. And Oliver Stone's 1994 satire Natural Born Killers was criticized for inspiring copycat killings.
Certainly, satire can be a dicey genre for studios to pull off. Just ask Sony, which became the target of a 2014 hack blamed on the North Koreans over the Seth Rogen comedy The Interview.
The script for The Hunt features the red-state characters wearing trucker hats and cowboy shirts, with one bragging about owning seven guns because it's his constitutional right. The blue-state characters — some equally adept with firearms — explain that they picked their targets because they expressed anti-choice positions or used the N-word on Twitter. "War is war," says one character after shoving a stiletto heel through the eye of a denim-clad hillbilly.
"Employees in different departments were questioning the wisdom of making such a movie in these times," says one filmmaker with ties to Universal. "In light of the horrific [recent shootings], is this not the most craven, irresponsible, dangerous exploitation?"
That point is countered by a Universal executive, who says the movie "is meant to show what a stupid, crazy world we live in," adding, "It might even be more powerful now."

Some are calling for the movie to be censored, I don't think it shoud. Nor I think it's ''satyrical'' because a quick walk on social media can convince you that coastal elites would actually go for it if they could.

Looking at the trailers, one of the most ironic thing is that the so called ''deplorables'' are in the end the good guys, while the coastal elite trying to build a perfect world and get rid of the trash are simply genocidal manics. Nonetheless, it's more or less what I have been describing for a while: plenty of liberals simply would like to round up white people, put them into camps and kill them in brutal manners. That's the plot of the movie.

Coming from the same hypocrites that then whine about ''The President's rhetoric dividing the country''. No, it's not Trump, it's the liberal elite. It has always been the case. Trump was chosen simply because he looked strong enough to fight back.

I believe it's going to do wonders for social cohesion in the US anyway. What do you guys think? Should it be censored? Will it further increase polarization?

-Similar threads merged. ~Abdülmecid I

[Big War Bird]

I'm guessing the surprise twist at the end is that there is no surprise twist. This seems about as appealing a movie as the Turner Diaries is a book.

[irontaino]

My real problem is that I do think that moderate liberals are doing a good job when it comes to keeping their extremists in check. Bret Weinstein on Rogan's podcast made a good point. The problem with his side is that many of the moderates don't like a number of conservatives and thus close an eye when some extremist of their own side starts harassing the latter. Simply on the basis of ''I don't like that guy too much anyway''. You may argue: conservatives aren't doing a great job at keeping Nazis and white supremacists in check, look at Pittsburg/El Paso etc. Ok, fair point. It's extremely hard to keep lone wolves in check. On the other hand, those who fuel polarization on the left actually work for mainstream media, academia and tech. They aren't lone wolves, they work on daily basis to demonize conservatives. Ben Shapiro, whom you might not like, but you can definitely say he's not a Nazi, gets harassed on daily basis and called Nazi by mainstream journalists.

The latter regularly engage with Antifa on social media as well. At least the right knows when to draw the line: no anti-semitism, no racial supremacism. Where does the left draw the line on its side? I just don't see it. You guys whine about my aggressive posting, yet all I do is posting extremists on the left and see you guys... defend them. So there's really no line. You don't see me defending Steve King. Why can't you guys do the same?

So you're saying you've never actually experienced any kind of discrimination or oppression, you're just parroting white nationalist conspiracy theories. Can you give an example of mainstream news calling Ben Shapiro a Nazi? Cause the last time he debated someone who wasn't a college sophomore his strategy was "REEEEEE, LEFTIST, REEEEEEE! " You also claim that white supremacists are lone wolves, yet I doubt the neo-Nazis and other white supremacists marching on Charlottesville were lone wolves, especially when the president refers to them as "very fine people". You also got communities like 8Chan which nurture terrorists like the Christchurch shooter, they're not lone wolves.