Ok, so you think killing your sister can sometimes be justified. Not specifically in an honor killing context, but you do think violence against family members can sometimes be justified. Now I can take that response and make you out to be some kind of bad evil person. Nhytgbvfeco answered a poll question saying that he thought killing family members can "sometimes be justified", what a sick person! I don't think it could ever be justified, he must be some kind of extremist.
Do you see the issue with how when grouping your response with a bunch of other's as a poll data point, any nuance about the context or circumstances about your answer are washed away by being in the category of "person who believe violence against sisters is sometimes justified". Poll responses are incredibly limited in terms of conclusions you can draw from them specifically because this reason. When you hear the poll response about honor killings, you immediately translate that to mean all those people that answered the poll that way would be ok with killing their sister/daughter if they were raped. Even though you don't know any nuance about any of those positions at all, in your mind they are all a standard, terrible answer. Moreover, you use this one poll response to justify the others, maintaining that they also are accurate in representing "radical Muslims" despite those responses being much more weak.