Re: [Amendment] Resolving Issue with Prothalomos' Movement
Originally Posted by
PikeStance
You want me to assume it may fail, wait for it, then counter-propose the Prothalomos back tot he Curia?
Prior to the passing of the Ostraka proposal, appeals were posted in the QP. I personally think anything involving citizenship should take place in the QP, so I would have made this proposal eventually. At the time of the proposal, I had other reasons to opposed it so I did not notice that appeals were placed in the Prothalomos.
Vote of No Confidence is obvious to me as well. It involved elected officials by the Citizens. I have never seen a comment by a Peregrinus regarding elections. It seems logical to me that they take place among citizens.
The large awards I am on the fence on, TBH.
Not my point. No failure can't be reversed and considering the present condition of the curia, it won't contribute to its fall. To re-use what you quoted a few posts above:
From order 66
... there should theoretically be little issue with this sort of melding of minds and any potential influx of new ideas, discussion, etc. Citizens will still be the only ones allowed to vote,
and hopefully be allowed a clearer and more direct view of other members views on certain proposals, decisions, and anything else brought up.
It seems that you have missed the part I've boldered and that's why I'm opposed to your proposal.
Originally Posted by
PikeStance
TBH, you have a strange negative opinion of me, so I am not surprised you have a negative view.
Don't get me wrong: you are perfectly entitled to defend your proposals and ideas. That's perfectly fine. But you also should accept the fact that not everybody can agree with you and can oppose to your proposals. Nothing personal here contrarily to what you seem to think.
Under the patronage of Flinn, proud patron of Jadli, from the Heresy Vault of the Imperial House of Hader