Restoration of Censure as a "Curial Note"
I would like to first share with you discussions between Censures and the Curator's Assistant (another issue actually, but get to that in another day).
Discussion Source
It's a pretty nasty accusation, with a very clear veiled insult.But I don't know what to do with it, if I'm honest. I think it's a borderline comment; it would be harsh to hand out a censure, but I don't like to let it slide either.I believe we sent a warning before. It's not something official but it can be done again if the two of you want it soI suppose we could do that. Like a "we've dismissed your case, but we're not happy with you, so you'll be on thin ice for a while" kind of thing. Although it does just feel like a censure-lite, which seems kind of redundant.well I would hold nothing against a warning if there is precedent for itI guess we can dismiss then and send an informal warning.
Voted.let us do that then also votedThe "warning" that is not a warning.If either if you want to draft a message for ... I'll gladly send it.
Here is a second discussion (Source)The Citizen's Triumvirate has decided to dismiss your referral (XXXIII) and take no further action against you. However, whilst no official action will be taken, the Censors found your comments to be borderline, and they advise you against similar rhetoric in the future. This case will be archived publicly as you requested.
If you have any further questions please do not ever hesitate to get in touch.
Yours sincerely,
I agree tough it is quite clear that this continuing battle between them needs to stop so I go with demissal with waring since there is nothing personal or uncitizen like hereThat's of course a possibility. However with ....resignation from citizenship (Though by all means he still is a citizen) I wonder if such a warning message would be very useful.Very well we will go for dismiss with a warning that the feud with Pike will no longer be tolerated to be delivered when and if he rejoins citizenship. Censure would be all but useless if he resigned.We do not see a drafted letter presumably because I made this post right about the same time.dismiss too with a warning to be delivered when returning agreed
A Censure is an expression of a formal disapproval. When the Triumvirate dismisses a case, they are stating that the action or behavior is not conducted unbecoming a citizen. You cannot dismiss a case and issue a reprimand. They had attempted to work around the "formal" term bu calling it an "informal reprimand, but you cannot say something is acceptable and not acceptable at the same time. If it is borderline, then issue a Censure. This is why Censure was included to handle borderline cases.
This is what happens when a Censure is treated like a Curial warning, rather than like a note. This proposal should end the apparent conundrum that seems to have inflicted the Triumvirate as of late. Censure is listed as a "Note."
We need to restore Censure as the borderline response for conduct that is "borderline." It is counterproductive and it sends the wrong message to conflate Censure with a dismissal of cases.
As a sidebar move. I am also removing abstain. There is no reason why a sitting Triumvirate member should abstain if they have the option to recuse themselves.
Constitutional Changes