...No, it's not a thread about which is better for a new player.
So, it's year ~231 B.C. in a Makedonia Long campaign. Epeiros and the KH are destroyed. Pergamon rules most of Anatolia, my frontier is currently at the Lower Danube, and (hopefully) I'll be able to get peace with the Getai soon-ish.
In this case, Antigonus made his sons swear on his deathbed that they wouldn't march East in imitation of their Grandfather, Demetrios. Not to be deterred from seeking Great Deeds(TM), after defeating the Getai, I'd like to make a move into the Western Med.
Question is; should I go after Italy, or North Africa+Sicily?
The factors in favor of Italy are the fairly well-rounded local roster (plenty of pseudo-Hoplites as far north as the Po Valley, light-to-medium cavalry, sword infantry in central+northern Italy), relatively compact, wealthy provinces and a certain amount of friendly culture in southern Italy.
The factors against are my concern that if I conquer Rome completely before the Polybian Reforms (I probably don't want to wait for them to get the AI fallback Marian Reforms), then I won't get access to the juicy reformed Italian/Roman units, as well as a lack of any decent Casus Belli: Rome has basically been stuck in Italy all game (except for a brief period when they held Dyrrachion), fighting the Arverni after Liguria revolted to them. There's no particular reason for me to attack Rome, given our previous mutual-beatdown of Epeiros.
The factors in favor of Carthage/North Africa/Sicily are access to excellent light troops (Kretan Archers are nice, but take so long to replenish, and Pergamon's got Crete), (potentially) lots of Libyan/Liby-Phoenecian infantry and cavalry, and potential allies in the form of the Numidians. Also, Carthage is currently eating their way across North Africa, all the way to the gates of Alexandria. I have plenty of in-universe Casus Belloi against Carthage; either by "supporting" Syracuse (read: annexing it and using it as a pretext to conquer Carthage), or as part of a bid to grab Egypt or mend fences w/ the Ptolemies (depending on how much they grovel for the return of their lost provinces)
The factors against are the totally foreign culture (Except for parts of Sicily, there's no Hellenistic culture anywhere in North Africa or Southern Spain), the rather spread-out nature of the relevant provinces (some of the coastal provinces aren't even contiguous!) and concerns that the local recruitment will be subpar. I remember that in EBI, almost all of the Carthaginian Factional units (Libyan Infantry/cavalry, Liby-Phoenecian Spearmen, etc) were only available to Carthage, so I'm concerned that I'll end up taking these provinces, but being stuck with nothing but Numidians and Garamantenes to defend them. No offense to Numidians and Garamantines, but I'd like at least 20% of my army to be wearing something on their chest more substantial than a piece of cloth.
TL;DR: As Makedon, I would like to expand West. I have an in-universe Casus Belli on Carthage, but I'm concerned that I won't have access to enough local units to properly garrison the region/add to my field armies. Will I have access to Carthaginian units in the coastal Phoenician cities, and/or will my Hellenistic Colonies provide decent line infantry/medium cavalry in the region?
Also, since the KH are defeated, does that mean I'll never have access to the Lakonian Hoplites? My only thought is to let the province rebel, hope that the KH respawns properly, then just not conquer them until the reform passes (smacking down their armies as necessary). Will that work?




Reply With Quote








