Page 11 of 16 FirstFirst ... 2345678910111213141516 LastLast
Results 201 to 220 of 311

Thread: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

  1. #201

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    is there a realease date for Impeiral spendour 3

  2. #202
    Quintus Hortensius Hortalus's Avatar Lex duodecim tabularum
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Electorate of Hannover
    Posts
    2,530

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Quote Originally Posted by OreoMan32 View Post
    is there a realease date for Impeiral spendour 3
    No there isn't any, the developement will take a long time.

    Under the patronage of wangrin my workshop

  3. #203

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Quote Originally Posted by Quintus Hortensius Hortalus View Post
    No there isn't any, the developement will take a long time.
    For mid era uniforms, maybe you can ask to the creator of the imperial destroyer mod. Many uniforms (new models and textures) of the 1740-1760 period for all the factions are in this mod.

  4. #204
    Quintus Hortensius Hortalus's Avatar Lex duodecim tabularum
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Electorate of Hannover
    Posts
    2,530

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Quote Originally Posted by Lib85 View Post
    For mid era uniforms, maybe you can ask to the creator of the imperial destroyer mod. Many uniforms (new models and textures) of the 1740-1760 period for all the factions are in this mod.
    I know that Lordsith is doing some great work!
    Well we already have some amazing models made by wangrin a long time ago which only need some textures. Anyway, our goal is to finish the late campaign first and then we will focus on the early campaign and things will be decided then.

    Don't forget to vote for the 2018 Modding Awards!

    Under the patronage of wangrin my workshop

  5. #205

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Will there be units for the Napoleonic timeline especially for the United States, England, France, Prussia, Spain, Russia, Austria and other countries?

  6. #206
    Quintus Hortensius Hortalus's Avatar Lex duodecim tabularum
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Electorate of Hannover
    Posts
    2,530

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghip View Post
    Will there be units for the Napoleonic timeline especially for the United States, England, France, Prussia, Spain, Russia, Austria and other countries?
    No we will not add Napoleonic units, sorry. Once we are done with RotR we will start with the 1700's units.

    Under the patronage of wangrin my workshop

  7. #207

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Might I make a suggestion for a name change for the Early-Mid 18th Century period of the mod? Any time I look for the mod through Google, it seems to confuse RoTR with the normal version of the mod., so to help differentiate them, I suggest the early period of the mod should be called Imperial Splendour: Ancien Régime, highlighting the societal splits that were appearing after the American Revolution (and mimics the political theme of RoTR at the same time)

  8. #208

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Also I would like to see when it is all completed, of course, that both RoTR and the early campaign mod Are combined into a single install and a launcher much like that used in Darthmod to select the period you want to play would be awesome. Having to install two different versions of the one mod would be a pain

  9. #209
    Quintus Hortensius Hortalus's Avatar Lex duodecim tabularum
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Electorate of Hannover
    Posts
    2,530

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Yes this is the plan for the future But TSanada's time right now is limited so the launcher currently stays as it is right now.

    Under the patronage of wangrin my workshop

  10. #210
    Quintus Hortensius Hortalus's Avatar Lex duodecim tabularum
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Electorate of Hannover
    Posts
    2,530

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)



    I uploaded a new model to sketchfab for you to explore: It's the officers hat of the Hanoverian 14th light infantry regiment.
    Click on the link below to have a look on the model:

    https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/14th...a9cbc591dfefeb

    Under the patronage of wangrin my workshop

  11. #211
    Quintus Hortensius Hortalus's Avatar Lex duodecim tabularum
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Electorate of Hannover
    Posts
    2,530

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)



    And I uploaded a new building model you can build in the next release: The Brunswick Palace.
    Check out the model on Sketchfab, I made some annotations to explain some history facts there:

    https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/brau...0a5b1cd7e3a149

    Under the patronage of wangrin my workshop

  12. #212

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Will you be doing special buildings for the other parts of Germany to give access to special troops from the many principalities?

    For example, Breisgau Vineyards getting a special building to gain access to troops from Baden? Or changing the name of Hessen-Kassel to Rhineland or back to Westphalia and giving Cassel a special building so it can recruit Hesse-Kassel troops, ,give Münster, Cleves and Frankfurt their own units too?

    Another example would be Prussia getting Mecklenburg units and Sweden getting Finnish units. There are probably many other places that could get this treatment, but these are the ones I think could do with the most variation now.

  13. #213
    Quintus Hortensius Hortalus's Avatar Lex duodecim tabularum
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Electorate of Hannover
    Posts
    2,530

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Quote Originally Posted by Merlin5790 View Post
    Will you be doing special buildings for the other parts of Germany to give access to special troops from the many principalities?

    For example, Breisgau Vineyards getting a special building to gain access to troops from Baden? Or changing the name of Hessen-Kassel to Rhineland or back to Westphalia and giving Cassel a special building so it can recruit Hesse-Kassel troops, ,give Münster, Cleves and Frankfurt their own units too?

    Another example would be Prussia getting Mecklenburg units and Sweden getting Finnish units. There are probably many other places that could get this treatment, but these are the ones I think could do with the most variation now.
    Yes this is the plan. However Hesse-Kassel will stay a "mayor" faction and Sweden has already a full set of Finish units. The next on the list is probably Saxe-Weimar.

    Under the patronage of wangrin my workshop

  14. #214

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    RotR: Rise of the Republic, this mod fix the ottoman bug?

  15. #215

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Hi guys,
    i,m currently playing a RotR campaign as Britain. My focus is a war against the usa (like american war of independence). In wich db tables do i change the ai behavior to be more aggressiv and to recruit more units. Because the usa-ai is so damn passive and always stay in philidelphia.

  16. #216

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Quote Originally Posted by morada454 View Post
    Hi guys,
    i,m currently playing a RotR campaign as Britain. My focus is a war against the usa (like american war of independence). In wich db tables do i change the ai behavior to be more aggressiv and to recruit more units. Because the usa-ai is so damn passive and always stay in philidelphia.
    The table you seek is called: campaign_ai_personality_junctions
    Unfortunately, while it does differentiate for research, it does not differentiate for what you are looking for. Within the table tere is a line that provide for differentiation between different cultures, but it is a simple number.

    There is also the campaign_ai_manager_behavior_junctions
    Here, it does differentiate between "FULL" and "MAINTENANCE." The US as an "emergent" faction (and vanilla) would be listed as the latter. If you want to change it, you have to change the starpos file.

  17. #217

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Hey guys, I've long been a fan of playing TW mods in every installment and I think I clocked over 1000 hrs in Darthmod for ETW. Imperial Splendour is adding an extra layer of difficulty that I really like. Because of my bias towards playing from Early right through to Late (I love the feeling of growing an Empire from nothing - and potentially out teching others) I'm weeping over the diversion into RTR lol. I do question in a nutshell, what's the key difference from RTR over regular IS (which is still obviously a little rough polishwise)? Is it simply a period thing? Aka Early vs Late?

    Also I try to NEVER be that guy but I find that setting the most basic ballparks keeps your fans off your back when it comes to release info - but for 3.0 do you think it'll be months? Years? Even the roughest potential goal makes things easier for us fans. I'm completely ok with whatever it is, it just makes it easier for me to hunker down (like it did with DeI's development) if there's a rough time frame to help keep the dream alive. But I think TW forums have by now established a fairly good culture of not pressuring you guys too hard to meet any kind of deadlines - we know that modding is hard and subject to so many things working at once! To hold a volunteer artist accountable to create a free product by any deadline is simply entitled at that point...

    But as a veteran of TW games (Empire getting my most playtime) and mods I can safely say you guys have a good mod here with good fundamentals that shift the difficulty for people who have played Darthmod and 'ho hum' at its easiness despite its awesome cinematic type battles. But yeah, 2.2.1b's stability is its only noticeable drawback in addition to Britain's 'missing strings' in diplomacy but I know that'll improve with some love.

    It would be nice if there were togglable features like Forts on/off, Trade ship limit on/off. I found the constant battle for trade dominance was actually a nice side chapter that created an appeal to invest in Navy, even for European land focused Factions which got killed off in IS due to Tradable ship caps (but I get it was for economy balance).

    I did find the troop stats jarring particularly for Prussia (my fav faction). I understand the quality of their Line Inf and array of Elite Inf was a little lacking in addition to having worse accuracy compared to Brits given historically the Prussian Army were seen as some of the finest, most disciplined and drilled infantry of the time - I understand many nations used Prussian expats as specialist companies due to their skill? Regardless of my personal take, I love that you guys have really tried to give each faction a flavour that plays differently. (I notice the Swedes are melee juggernauts).

    I have seen some people post some pretty blunt posts occasionally - credit to you guys, you sound remarkably patient and professional in response.

  18. #218

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Hi, you ever thought about add occupation options like loot, peace occupation, libations, like in napoleon TW, is definitely possible, I played long time ago in VDM or VMD i cant remember that but was possible to do it

  19. #219

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    Do you guys plan to add the Pirates and NA Indians as playable factions? Cause this would be awesome....

  20. #220

    Default Re: DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION & COMMENTARY (Share, comments, questions, and sugestions)

    HelloI played your mod:English countryside,1 generals all have a portrait even after more than thirty recruitments.2 a lot of unitscampaign well develop.against the French campaign is not as well develop:1 very few units especially after the revolution.2 The portraits of the generals are gray after having recruited a general with the portrait of Napoleon I tried several times before 1789 or after nothing changes.go evolve your mod for the French, Austrian, Prussian, Russian campaign.
    HelloI played your mod:English countryside,1 generals all have a portrait even after more than thirty recruitments.2 a lot of unitscampaign well develop.against the French campaign is not as well develop:1 very few units especially after the revolution.2 The portraits of the generals are gray after having recruited a general with the portrait of Napoleon I tried several times before 1789 or after nothing changes.go evolve your mod for the French, Austrian, Prussian, Russian campaign.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •