I started a Sparta campaign on normal difficulty. I tried 5 unsuccessful campaigns they all failed with me not even being able to conquer one settlement. I tried turtling but with Sparta not even being a major city I couldn't make enough money to get a decent army going,and was attacked by Rome and Crete. I tried recruiting an army on another try and most I can get around 15 units than im in the red. This army was not enough to conquer Athens because by the time it takes you to get 15 units Athens has an army much larger than you plus the city garrison. Any one tried Sparta with this mod and had success?
Did you try????:
1) Raise your taxes (keeping an eye on the PO)
2) Do the statemen missions to try to get some money.
3) Discover new factions to get allies and future trade agreements.
4) Ask as much money as you could in your diplomatic agreements.
Campaigns are totally random, so despite you will get a few same things between each one of them, not every single aspect will be exactly a copy paste (lovely total war randomness I love you). So don't panic. Retry and if you can't succeed, hey! maybe Sparta is not for you? try another faction, it's not the end of the world, isn't it?
Hope my tips helps you
Cheers!
Hi Guys,
After a few years I’ve come back to R2TW (I mean: to DEI, it’s the only reason to play it) and I’ve got a few questions (I’ve played Massila VH with KAM’s Alternative Economy, I was crushed after 70 turns by Arverni and Helvetii, both fielding 4 full stacks all the time):
- taking the provincial settlements outright is now possible as if there’s no siege/walls mechanics. Is it really true or do I miss something?
- the AI non-playable factions builds up their armies up to the max – for 1 settlement factions is 80 units (4 full-stacks). After a defeat they’re able to respawn those units within 20 turns. Is there a way to limit this never-ending-sea-of-troops mechanism and make battles more varried (not only 20 units against 20 units, or 40 vs 40), and more decisive (a big battle won means something for the war)?
On the other players’ comments:
This is also my experience. Flood of AI troops.
It’s exactly opposite to my experience. I see AI building up to 80 units while having just 1 settlement, each army is 20. After losing an army the AI is rebuilding them instantly.
These are similar observations and emotions to those I do have.
JoC
Last edited by Jurand of Cracow; May 31, 2018 at 03:54 AM.
Mod leader of the SSHIP: traits, ancillaries, scripts, buildings, geography, economy.
..............................................................................................................................................................................
If you want to play a historical mod in the medieval setting the best are:
Stainless Steel Historical Improvement Project and Broken Crescent.
Recently, Tsardoms and TGC look also very good. Read my opinions on the other mods here.
..............................................................................................................................................................................
Reviews of the mods (all made in 2018): SSHIP, Wrath of the Norsemen, Broken Crescent.
Follow home rules for playing a game without exploiting the M2TW engine deficiencies.
Hints for Medieval 2 moders: forts, merchants, AT-NGB bug, trade fleets.
Thrones of Britannia: review, opinion on the battles, ideas for modding. Shieldwall is promising!
Dominant strategy in Rome2, Attila, ToB and Troy: “Sniping groups of armies”. Still there, alas!
You might have some other mods enabled as in DeI, 1 region factions can't field 4 stacks.
I will be also updating this mod after new version of DeI will be released.
Official DeI Instagram Account! https://www.instagram.com/divideetimperamod/
Official DeI Facebook Page! https://www.facebook.com/divideetimperamod
I'm sure no other mod is enabled as it's a fresh install and I have no other mod but the DEI. It might have indeed been because of VH. Anyway, 80-unit-faction has happened it was after I've subjugated them what spawned a half-stack (13) just in the capital. But for the other 1-region factions I've seen many times 60 units.
EDIT: I've just checked the upkeep costs of units for the Helvetii AI (on VH). It seems that some cost really nothing: Bagaudas show upkeep cost of 73, while in the DEI information window (right-click on the unit card) is described 347, Corio Jovincos 37 (178), but Appea Gaedotos 296 (529) - all are in the same army. In the king's army Bagaudas' upkeep is 31, Appea Gaedotos' 233. In another army Iasotae 71/307, Bagaudas 80, Appea Gaedotos 307. In a Treveri army: Botroas 331/571, Hurjaz Drutiz 214/612, Batoroi 56/242, Bagaudoi 43/188, Nervi Gaesatoi 248/428, Eburonae Lugoae 65/283, Epatha Scammos (it's cavalry) 187/813. For the Arvenii it seem not to be so bad: Kingetoi 310/534, Ambaktoi 337/581, Gaballokigetoi 214/369.
Maybe there's something with the upkeep for those weaker units and for cavalry? KAM, as you've written, you've got a mathematical formula for the recalculation of prices...
EDIT2: I've checked it now on Normal: Gaeroas 98/208, Epatha Scammos 350/813, Bagaudas 163/347, Botroas 411/571.
I've got no idea if these numbers are already what's intended in the AE submod, or they're still from DEI1.2.2.
I'm playing now on Normal as Hayasdan. After 20 turns Kartli has 45 units (plus 17-garrison in Kartli) and has just taken Phasis. Ardhan has 33 units, while Trapezos only 20. I'm still having 6 units, as nobody has attacked me. Hayasdan has 5 regions so it can turtle and seek an opportunity.
BTW - it happened a few times to me that the number of units is reported, but there're no pics in the box (well, but they come to the battle).
Anyway, the Kartlians after turn 26 they took another region - Gabala. They're fighting against 3 factions (Trapezous, Kolkhis, Ardhan) and they won. Maybe it has something to do with the fact they're a "major" faction (the human player can play from the very beginning)? In that previous game, I've noticed that factions like Arverni or Edetani would attack very competently and expand consistently and fast.
Or maybe the Kartlians are just having an easy time: they're in a central position, and Ardhan/Kolchis expanded outwards what provided Kartli with many opportunities.
BTW, playing Massilia (1 region, 20k income) I had only 2 recruitment slots while playing Hayasdan (5 regions, 8k income) I've got 5. What factor determines it?
Last edited by Jurand of Cracow; May 31, 2018 at 09:40 AM.
I hope KAM updates alongside 1.2.3's release, my current Seleucid campaign with this submod is probably my favorite campaign that I've ever played in DEI!
@Dardo - thank for the info! It seems to me that it's a good solution - making the speed of recruitment dependent on the size of the land, not the economic development. It makes the 4-region provinces more valuable as well.
Some more observations on the campaign with KAM's AE:
- in general, I think the changes are much welcome;
- as you're likely to have much more money (in the nominal terms) in the treasury all the time, there'll be more requests from the other factions to give them gifts. At the beginning I've hesitated, but then I've learnt that you may reject these claims with impunity, so I just kept on rejecting them.
- the amount of money from the trade relations has been adjusted, but the money you pay / you receive to get the deal was not. As a result, that additional deal-making money is much lower in real terms than it's in the vanilla DEI. This is a reasonable change for two reasons. One, if you play a trading faction (say Rodos) in vanilla DEI on a Normal difficulty you can make much money just selling trade agreements. Second, if you play a non-trading faction (say, any Celts) in the same situation, you are very unlikely to have trade deals (at least with those Greek factions). The Alternative Economy makes real income/costs in both situations much more reasonable/affordable.
- just to recall: don't you ever play any other difficulty than Normal with this submod (and I think this warning should be included in the first post - I had read the entry of Sarkiss in this thread, but it has not convinced me then). The reason is: because the conversion of the prices of the military units is bugged, the AI factions find it very cheap to field armies, and each faction raises quickly as much military as possible (maximum number of full stacks) and is restoring the lost troops also very quickly - it's not a risk, it's a certitude.
Last edited by Jurand of Cracow; June 01, 2018 at 03:19 AM.
The higher the difficulty, the more of an -upkeep bonus the ai receives -20 -25 -30 -35 -40, so yeah anything higher than normal or hard will have them get bonusses of up to -60 or -70 with all technologies and general traits. Recruitment gets them a similar buff of -10 -15 -20 -25 -30. So it's not that "because the conversion of the prices of the military units is bugged" since the unit prices are a hard set value, rather than calculated based on the difficulty, but higher difficulties will make them more and more cheaper for the AI, just like it does in regular DEI. It should probably be noted that regular DEI has also been balanced around normal, people are free to play any higher difficulties but this obviously makes it much more challenging. Currently I'm playing on hard, and yes due to my own error the AI initially had an even higher upkeep reduction, which allowed them to build several stacks for 1 region. But due to CA's crappy Ai, these are all levy units (the AI is pretty much forced to spend its entire military budget right away, so that usually means crappy units).
Last edited by Dardo21; June 01, 2018 at 05:52 AM.
I think it's only part of the story. I've quoted the numbers and it seems there's 50% difference for some units, while much less (25%) for the other.
Normal: Botroas 411/571, Bagaudas 163/347, Epatha Scammos 350/813.
VH: Botroas 331/571, Bagaudas 73, Epatha Scammos 187/813
KAM mentioned he'd applied a special mathematical formula (so I infer the "hard set value" is before application of this formula) and I'd guess the reason is somewhere there. Or maybe somewhere in the R2TW engine, I don't know.
In the M2TW engine there's a unit-recruitment-priority mechanism that makes it possible for the creation of the reasonable AI army compositions (the newer mods achieve very good results somehow, I don't know the details).
I think it's also feasible to do it in R2TW, isn't it?
On another issue: I've noticed that in the DEI taking the provincial settlements outright is possible as if there’s no siege/walls mechanics (I think it's a free ladder at the beginning of any siege). This makes the AI attacks very easy - while playing Massilia I've experience losing in one turn two settlements to Helvetii (provincial capital of Mediolan and a city of Geuna) and two to Arvernin (Tolosa and Narbo). What was the reason to such a solution (I mean the provincial capital)?
I'm not talking about the compositions of the army, those can indeed by formed with templates, but the AI is hardcoded to fill armies to the limits of its budget at the start of the game, and it doesn't disband units, so that's why you often end up with barbarian factions with lots of stacks with cheap units.
I don't get it, explain, please.
Let's have that Helvetii example, a 1-region faction, must be able to recruit different units. If there's a "template", why doesn't it recruit the more expensive units?
(I understand that the AI recruits instantly as much as possible given it has money).
Since it's hardcoded to fill as many armies as possible, it doesn't wait until it has build a higher level barracks to build more expensive units, so it fills as many armies as possible with cheap units. That's also the reason why you see Rome running around with pre-polybian units around the marian reforms, it will only build marian units if that army gets destroyed, or when it gets enough money to build new forces. So if you have a 1 region faction, and it has several stacks with cheap units, it will build better units if you kill their armies and they have build a barracks by now.