Any reason
why you omitted most of the input which informed the review of the rules. That being:
- Current legislation and Government policy on human rights, equality and communications
- Advertising industry management initiatives
- Comparison with international standards
-
Consultation with industry and the public
- Public opinion research ( this is what the public said 'Gender roles and characteristics portrayed in advertising were generally perceived to be dated and not reflective of modern society. Portrayals did not always reflect real-life experiences or lacked diversity and because of this were perceived to potentially limit future aspirations. Women and teen girls, in particular, expressed concern at the potential future impact of advertising in terms of perpetuating stereotypical messages over time.'
Now, why the omission? As the details man mentioned, the rules were influenced by multiple sources, particularly from industry and importantly, the view of women themselves. yet you persist that the only influence is related to gender-related studies. I sense a lack of empathy for women here.