Do nothing against it (as unfortunately, some factions wouldnt be alive without it at this point, for example Heritance, so its extremely rooted in the current situation))
You cannot move units generated from missions for a turn /se
Units received from a mission may not be used in a battle the turn that they are received
You must disband all units that you receive from missions.
The Fallen God
Re: [The Elder Scrolls - Unofficial Patch 1.42] Black Drake
BTW, is it allowed to intentionally let settlements rebel so that you can sack it again? Afaik, Mergor has done that several times, currently in Dunkori Walk, when he simply left it empty, standing next to it with a full stack, waiting for it to rebel again...?
Even when the purpose is to lower the unrest by conquering it again (so not having to leave that many units inside afterwards) and not getting more money, I dont think this is/should be allowed?
T H E | G O R
Re: [The Elder Scrolls - Unofficial Patch 1.42] Black Drake
Damn Jadli, you must be incredibely salty if you think that I did that so I could sack it again, and that I done it already (why didn't I do it with Torval, then?). I simply didn't want to garrisson it, because holding it costs me too much.
Re: [The Elder Scrolls - Unofficial Patch 1.42] Black Drake
It's hard to handle a city that just keeps rebelling and fighting your troops losing soldier count that the population keeps fighting you. I'd leave it too if it having troops doesnt rectify this. Even with a full stack garrisoned. Getting priests and a church there takes awhile and they would have rebelled anyway. That's my thought anyways
The Fallen God
Re: [The Elder Scrolls - Unofficial Patch 1.42] Black Drake
Well, If an army cant stop it from rebelling, then you obviously cant do much else... but such a small settlement could have been fine with a few units for sure
No, I said you likely did it to reduce unrestOriginally Posted by Mergor
. That settlement isnt worth much either way...
So you mean you are just gonna leave the region entirely? Well, I suppose then its fine...
About previous cases... well we both know you kept letting Brackenleaf rebel numerous times, though that has been for another reason, to continously receive missions to take it... but welp, thats another story
T H E | G O R
Re: [The Elder Scrolls - Unofficial Patch 1.42] Black Drake
While it was nice letting Brackenleaf rebel and getting a mission on it, I actually let it rebel because it gave me negative 200 income. So I actually had to pay up to keep it. But then I always got a mission on it and had to take it back
T H E | G O R
Re: [The Elder Scrolls - Unofficial Patch 1.42] Black Drake
Save will be uploaded tomorrow
T H E | G O R
Re: [The Elder Scrolls - Unofficial Patch 1.42] Black Drake
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachmen...6/BD_BM_67.sav
Cormunt taken, priest assasinated, ship defeated
https://postimg.cc/gallery/vssGtCD
Champion of Dragons
Re: [The Elder Scrolls - Unofficial Patch 1.42] Black Drake
I will most likely will need an extension for this turn.
"The Dragon is wise, a sage among the ignorant. He knows not all that glitters is gold."
Champion of Dragons
Re: [The Elder Scrolls - Unofficial Patch 1.42] Black Drake
Anequina up!
https://www.sendspace.com/file/n3uebk
Borderwatch was taken, as Blackmarsh: https://imgur.com/a/C8K6F4h
As Sharnhelm a decision had to be made now, that a Pact was forged on the east again:
King Ranser biding his time, ever since to get back at the bretons of Wayrest and for their arrogance, decided the time has come.
Even the last time, where it was supposed to be a "appeasement", so Sharnhelm gets a better share of the fallen daggerfall lands, Ranser got insulted, that in order to get territory, he had to give up another, essentially not making any difference, while the Wayrest continued to sit on the rich lands, like a fat spider. Even after all the successes, regarding involving Skyrim within the covenant and the empire losing their heartlands Wayrest still decided, that all the glory and wealthy parts of the lands should go to him. The High King is while "made" arrangements to let the Orcs receive their supposed homelands back, I still don't see all of such territories given back to them, while he sits on the all the lands, that gives him all the wealth. He could have given markarth to the orcs, as a fine gift, but no. All that wealth is needed for this fat spider.
With Wayrest now waging war on far away lands, Ranser decided, the time is right to claim himself, as High King and get back at everyone, that wronged him, ever since the Black Drake was defeated and the former Daggerfall was let to sack one of our ancestral homeland, for the rest of the Covenant alliance was "busy" elsewhere conquering the rich homelands of Daggerfall for themselves. Sharnhelm got no help rebuilding Ranser will see to it, to get his payment now.
"The Dragon is wise, a sage among the ignorant. He knows not all that glitters is gold."
The Fallen God
Re: [The Elder Scrolls - Unofficial Patch 1.42] Black Drake
Come on man, you cant be serious about this
This is the exact opposite of playing your factions indepently. Obviously, you found out that you would have to give up Sharnhelm due to joining Ebonheart Pact with your other faction, Blackmarsh... and so suddenly you decide to rebel with Sharnhelm, so that you can keep playing the faction. (And for the record, there has been peace for many turns, and Sharnhelm has been doing very well for themselves in Skyrim). And of course not even talking about, that Sharnhelm rebellion (that cant succeed anyway) is direct help to Ebonheart Pact, and hence your other faction.
Thats an absolute no from me
Reply With Quote
