Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: How fun would this campaign be with some form of multiplayer?

  1. #1

    Default How fun would this campaign be with some form of multiplayer?

    Think about it, alliances would matter more with real players, battles would have weight with actual ingenuity from your opponent, and diplomacy in theory would make sense. Only issue is logistics

  2. #2

    Default Re: How fun would this campaign be with some form of multiplayer?

    There's the Hotseat mode, but it requires those players to be in the same room. It also doesn't work properly with the way reforms and other events are coded, unfortunately. Not without a complete rethink (and rewrite) of most of the script.

  3. #3

    Default Re: How fun would this campaign be with some form of multiplayer?

    that already exist and it's called hotseat, which can be played over email. I currently play in a eb2 hotseat over email.

  4. #4

    Default Re: How fun would this campaign be with some form of multiplayer?

    Quote Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius View Post
    There's the Hotseat mode, but it requires those players to be in the same room. It also doesn't work properly with the way reforms and other events are coded, unfortunately. Not without a complete rethink (and rewrite) of most of the script.
    Would the reforms not trigger at all, or just trigger automatically at a set date?

    Thanks

  5. #5

    Default Re: How fun would this campaign be with some form of multiplayer?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmeh36 View Post
    Would the reforms not trigger at all, or just trigger automatically at a set date?

    Thanks
    Automatically on a set date/fixed set of conditions as if the faction was AI.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •