PFM 5.0 - Warhammer 2 support

[Matmannen]

Do you use the latest schema 108? I don't have problems with any table (except cultures, which I didn't fix yet).

I started using it and some of the tables got fixed, but all tables that arn't basic got broken. Also, I'll have to rewrite about 20 variantdefinitions...

[Larynja]

I started using it and some of the tables got fixed, but all tables that arn't basic got broken. Also, I'll have to rewrite about 20 variantdefinitions...

I use 68 different tables in my mod at the moment, I wouldn't call most of them "basic", and all work fine. Also I don't encounter any problems with my custom variantmesh. In order to provide any useful help I need more detailed information on the problems you encounter.

[Matmannen]

I use 68 different tables in my mod at the moment, I wouldn't call most of them "basic", and all work fine. Also I don't encounter any problems with my custom variantmesh. In order to provide any useful help I need more detailed information on the problems you encounter.

Ok. The tables are far gone since I ended up deleting all the tables that broke and have started rewriting them. The definitions are still there though. I don't reallyknow how I could explain the issue more than say that when ever I "right click" > "open as text" a costum variantdefinition, instead of a variantdefinition, I get this:

?@
????LI??,M?H??????U????????u?e9r?k?Y>K?tC?@?"????m?p???9??????h?*????;??????"IB????
.??S#?f?A????9'S?vg??L

[Larynja]

Ok. The tables are far gone since I ended up deleting all the tables that broke and have started rewriting them. The definitions are still there though. I don't reallyknow how I could explain the issue more than say that when ever I "right click" > "open as text" a costum variantdefinition, instead of a variantdefinition, I get this:

Did you try to right-click your definition to extract it? If you open the extracted file externally, with notepad for example, do you get the same result?

[Matmannen]

Did you try to right-click your definition to extract it? If you open the extracted file externally, with notepad for example, do you get the same result?

So I extract a variantdefinition. I'm not sure what to do after extracting it (I have never used this feature, simply dragging a dds to a folder usually works on its own), but I clicked the file I extracted and dragged and let it go in a folder. I reassianged it to an xml file and the result is the following:

ª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªªu I”É—dÕî ¢ pÒ$Oò$Õî @TTT I’$I’$ ªªªªÆ gŸñ�>Õî

ð h²'Nò$Õî @PTT I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª� ‡>y’$Õî @AQUY I’$I’Õî UUü á&Þ3¬Õî @@ ÿ !”1ðOÕî


¹ NÂ$x"'Õî TTPP½ —˜‰—Õî 
 JúäI‚$Õî UTƒ XÒ'I’$Õî PPTU£ 9˜ÐÉ“$Õî

U I’$I’$ ªªªªX ‡“$I’$Õî @QUU4 I‘$I’$Õî UUU I’$I’$ ªªªª I�dI’$Õî UUŒ x²'O’$Õî PPTU I’$I’$ ªªªª“ É‘„I’$Õî U HÒ$I’$Õî TTUU I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªªF I�$I’$Õî UU_ JÌ©–$Õî P n ÉS0d’$Õî A@@Tq A4A4Õî AAAA I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªªŸ Éó9™$Õî


ÿ àÏ�$Õî á ¨¿'O’$Õî PTU H’$I’$Õî TUUUo ‘œI˜„Õî
 H’$I’$Õî TUUU I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªªÄ ¡:¡c4Õî AA@@ I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªªS I’$IÕî UUU
ÿ IœÄyÅ Õî  ÿ Iâ$r‚9Õî UPP I’$I’$ ªªªª I’$I’$ ªªªª

[Razjiel]

I try to open packmanager through wine and it seems it cannot find the game directory.

"FileNotFoundException: Game directory not found: data".

Does anyone have configuration file PackFileManager.exe.config which pre-set paths?

[lovely skaven]

well I was previously using pfm 5.0 and for some reason I had to desinstall it and now whenever I run the packfilemanager.exe it doesn't ask me where I want to install it. It just asks me the path for my total war games and then it opens normally but as soon as I exit the PFM I can't find it back it's nowhere. Any idea??

[Tomcat84]

Is there any other mirror for this? Sourceforge appears to be having massive problems for a few days already now. Thanks!

[flexter]

Unfortunately PFM 5.0 is broken for Rome 2 main_units_land_tables I just get an error message.

Changes with land_unit_tables have no effect in game now either.

Any chance of an update soon?

[PROMETHEUS ts]

Hi , I updated with the latest version of PFM but I can't work on RT2W files as it keeps crashing or all sort of bugs, is there a more stable version that can allow me to work on the new patch update?

[PROMETHEUS ts]

[Commissar Caligula_]

You should probably also try pming Larynja, the new person keeping PFM up to date.

[PROMETHEUS ts]

Is there an older stable version ?that allows me to open the new patch?

[PROMETHEUS ts]

I downloaded 4.1.2 also and keeps giving thesame error .

main unit files is not visible.

When I instead open an old mod file I get this ...

[Commissar Caligula_]

No idea, maybe ask Dresden? If it's a problem with the new update in general he'll have run into it, otherwise its probably a problem solely on your end.
Also, want me to move the thread to the Rome 2 section since we're talking about Rome 2?

[PROMETHEUS ts]

Dunno , wherever gets more visibility to get fixed.

[PROMETHEUS ts]

It doesnt allow anymore to read Rome II main unit table !

[Asmodeus]

Yes it does, if you update the schema to 108, but it will not open the new DK tables until the schemas are again updated.

[nordstern]

i do not know why.. but i have not updated the schema 108, 107 and 106.. and it works fine with the main_unit_table...

maybe an error in your new schema?

[PROMETHEUS ts]

Yes it does, if you update the schema to 108, but it will not open the new DK tables until the schemas are again updated.

What means?