
The De Veres are one of the oldest lines of Norman nobility in England, dating back to a certain 'Albericus' or Aubrey de Vere who was listed as a significant landowner in Essex (indeed this was where the De Veres' ancestral seat, Hedingham Castle, was built) and the Queen's chamberlain in the Domesday Book of 1086. His son and heir, also named Aubrey, was made into the first De Vere Lord Great Chamberlain of England following the disgrace of that office's previous occupant, Robert Malet, in 1133, while Aubrey II's son Aubrey III was made the first-ever Earl of Oxford in 1141. A De Vere has always held the Earldom of Oxford since, and the office of Lord Great Chamberlain as well with only a few interruptions. They have a lengthy history of getting involved in the great political disputes and civil wars of the country, and leaping from faction to faction as it suited their needs - then escaping the consequences for their oft-dizzying turnabouts, whether by attaching themselves to the victorious party just in time or making themselves indispensable to the victors even after their chosen side's defeat. Suffice to say that until recently, loyalty was not one of this house's strong suits.
Under Aubrey III, the De Veres at first fought for the claim of Matilda against that of Stephen de Blois during the Anarchy: after Aubrey II was lynched by a mob in London, Aubrey III did homage unto the Empress. His allegiance to Matilda was not ironclad however, and there were times where the new Earl of Oxford stood down and made peace with Stephen, then took up arms for Matilda again, and on and on. The end of the war saw a series of neck-breaking volte-faces on the part of Earl Aubrey, who at first hosted Matilda at Hedingham Castle where she died in 1152, then rode with Stephen to lay siege to Wallingford Castle in 1153, where he supported the Treaty of Wallingford as a compromise solution by which Stephen would remain King but be succeeded by Henry FitzEmpress of Anjou, Matilda's son, upon his death rather than his own offspring. The De Veres escaped consequences for their habit of constantly turning coats, as Aubrey de Vere kept both the Earldom of Oxford and the office of Lord Great Chamberlain under Henry II, and in fact both remained in the possession of his heirs to the present day.
Aubrey III's younger son Robert, 3rd Earl of Oxford, played the same dangerous game his father had taken part in during the time of King John. In 1215 he was among the peers who forced the unpopular John into signing the Magna Carta, for which he was excommunicated by the Pope as a rebel, and who then continued to follow the baronial party in attempting to overthrow John in favor of Prince Louis of France when John tried to avoid actually implementing the accord. The next year, Robert knelt before John and pleaded for his mercy after royalist forces took Hedingham Castle, only to turn around and proclaim himself Louis' man once again when the French prince rode into London just three months later. When John died in 1217, most of the rebel barons went back to the Angevin side, and Robert was little different: even after Louis had recovered Hedingham Castle for him, the Earl of Oxford hardly needed to think twice before going back on his oaths (again) and kneeling before the boy-king. Also like his father, Robert suffered virtually no consequences for his treacherous habits, as the new King (or his regents, rather) fully restored him to his lands and office by 1218.
Another Robert, grandson of the above, joined Simon de Montfort's rebels in the Barons' War of 1264-7. After the defeat and slaughter of the Montforts at the hands of Prince Edward, future King Edward I, at the Battle of Evesham, the 5th Earl of Oxford became the first member of his family to actually experience negative consequences for his treason by being attainted, though he continued to hold out with the other surviving rebels at Kenilworth Castle until his titles and estates were restored to him by the Dictum of 1266.
The early 14th-century De Veres were not as significant to England's internal troubles as their forebears. Yet another Robert, the eldest son of the one who joined Montfort's rising, was not a particularly relevant player on England's political stage and instead served as a military commander in Edward I's wars with the Welsh, Scots and French. His arms appeared in the Falkirk Roll of Arms, denoting his participation in that great English victory over the troublesome foe to the north, and he rode with the rest of the English lords loyal to Edward II (or simply more committed to destroying the Scots than petty feuds with their king) to Bannockburn, where like most right-thinking Englishmen he expected another rousing triumph under the son of the mighty Hammer of the Scots. Alas, it was not to be...
| Robert de Vere, 6th Earl of Oxford | 
Age: 57 (born 20 January, 1257)
Spouse: N/A (widowed: wife was Margaret Mortimer, d. 1297)
Traits: 6 pts
+5 Battles (base 3, +2 from Reserved, Bloodthirsty)
+2 Survival
+1 Personal Combat
+5% income (Austere)
-3 Charisma (Austere, Reserved, Bloodthirsty)
Temperaments:
Phlegmatic - dominant:
- Austere: This character disdains pomp and pageantry, instead preferring a plain & simple (the uncharitable might say 'rigidly spartan') lifestyle. +5% income, -1 Charisma.
- Reserved: This character is a stoic who generally keeps to him/herself and exercises strict control over their emotions. While this means they're not likely to make reckless moves in court or on the battlefield, they can come across as unfeeling robots to others. +1 battle rolls, -1 Charisma.
Choleric - subservient:
- Bloodthirsty: This character is hotheaded and loves to jump into fights, lethal or otherwise. This is not something others find endearing off the battlefield, though. +1 Battles, -1 Charisma.
There is little to be said of the sixth Conte de Oxenforde, least of all from his own lips. Robert is a man of few words, with little patience for the frivolities of court life - he spends as little as he can get away with, to sustain the bare minimum lifestyle expected of an earl for the sake of appearances and to avoid forfeiting his rank - and a mind for war, not politics. He is a veteran knight and captain, having served diligently under Edward I in the latter's wars in Wales (where he became acquainted with the 1st Baron Mortimer, whose daughter Margaret he married), Scotland and France, and distinguished himself as a bold commander, relentless on the offensive, and willing to lead both from the front and rear. However, the Earl of Oxford also lacks much in the way of political allies: it isn't necessarily that he is a repulsive personality, he simply did not go out of his way to make friends and disdains court politics in favor of smashing in the heads of Welshmen/Scots/Frenchmen on the battlefield. The result is that he is a politically isolated lord despite his middling rank in the peerage, who similarly only has few enemies because he hasn't been politically active enough to cross anyone of note either. |
| Sir Thomas de Vere | 
Age: 22 (born 27 July, 1292)
Spouse: N/A
Traits: 6 pts
+2 Personal Combat
+2 Battles
+1 Charisma
Temperaments:
Sanguine - dominant:
- Confident: This character is very self-assured, brimming with confidence and difficult to shake even under pressure. However, taken to an extreme, they can show a suicidal disregard for their life and the lives of others, and fail to take...well, failure into account when planning. +1 battle rolls, +1 to rout rolls against this character.
- Upbeat: Nothing seems to get this character down. They're perpetually smiling and looking on the bright side of even the darkest developments, truly the kind of optimism that can be infectious...or delusional, if the situation is bad enough. +1 to surviving non-battle death rolls, -1 to post-battle rolls (captivity, death, wounding).
Supine - subservient:
- Idealistic: This person is a strong believer in higher ideals and the innate goodness of man. On the one hand they tend to be inspiring and uplifting figures, on the other they can be taken advantage of by those who live well beneath their expectations. +1 Charisma, -1 to rout/assassination/escape rolls.
The only child and heir of Robert de Vere, Sir Thomas is a jovial and upbeat fellow, unlike his stern and dour father. However, in some ways, the apple hasn't fallen far from the tree either - Thomas is a capable fighter and jouster, having been trained from childhood to ride horses and fight with a variety of weapons both on foot & horseback like most other knights, and he also disdains politics, although for rather different reasons than his old man. The young De Vere is an idealist and ardent believer in the chivalric code, unlike the more jaded 6th Earl, and believes it is right and just to keep oneself above the politics of court. After all, as far as he's concerned God favors those who would settle their disputes openly and honestly (even if that means beating one another to death with hammers), over those who deceive and back-stab their way to victory. |
| Other De Veres | Sir Hugh de Vere, age 55 (b. 1259), Robert's brother. Married to Denise de Munchensy, daughter of Sir William de Munchensy of Swanscombe, Kent.
Sir Alphonse de Vere, age 54 (b. 1260), Robert's brother. Married to Jane Foliot, daughter of John Lord Foliot.
John de Vere, age 2 (b. 1312), Robert's nephew and son of Sir Alphonse & Jane Foliot.
Sir Thomas de Vere, b. 1261, died from illness in 1310.
Joan de Vere, b. 1262, d. 1294. Was married to John de Warenne, 6th Earl of Surrey, and mother to the 7th Earl.
Gilbert de Vere, age 50 (b. 1264), a cleric.
Philip de Vere, age 47 (b. 1267), a cleric.
Hawise de Vere, age 44 (b. 1270). A nun. |
|