"Therefore I am not in favour of raising any dogmatic banner. On the contrary, we must try to help the dogmatists to clarify their propositions for themselves. Thus, communism, in particular, is a dogmatic abstraction; in which connection, however, I am not thinking of some imaginary and possible communism, but actually existing communism as taught by Cabet, Dézamy, Weitling, etc. This communism is itself only a special expression of the humanistic principle, an expression which is still infected by its antithesis – the private system. Hence the abolition of private property and communism are by no means identical, and it is not accidental but inevitable that communism has seen other socialist doctrines – such as those of Fourier, Proudhon, etc. – arising to confront it because it is itself only a special, one-sided realisation of the socialist principle."
Marx to A.Ruge
If they truly did so, they probably did it as a retaliation, attacking the medical support right after the main attack is exactly what they did in february 27. That's a friendly reminder, ignore the unwritten rules of war and you will be responded in the same way.
I'm stilling waiting for ioannis76 to show at what point in that video shows Turkish forces attacking an ambulance. Meanwhile, the Syrian regime and Russia is known to be deliberately targeting healthcare structure in Idlib:
Stop the carnage: doctors call for an end to Syria hospital airstrikes
As Idlib province comes under renewed attack, Nobel laureates and surgeons issue a plea to save their colleagues and patients
Dozens of prominent doctors have called for urgent action to halt the bombing campaign by Syrian and Russian planes that has targeted more than 20 hospitals in Syria’s north-west, putting many out of action and leaving millions of people without proper healthcare.
Coordinates for many of those hit had been shared with the regime and its Russian backers by the United Nations in an effort to protect civilians. The Syrian opposition were promised war planes would avoid identified sites on bombing raids; instead they have endured more than a month of fierce attacks.
Since late April, in defiance of a truce brokered by Moscow and Ankara last year, regular airstrikes on opposition-held territory in northern Idlib province have killed hundreds of civilians and displaced hundreds of thousands more, rights groups say.
The Armenian Issuehttp://www.twcenter.net/forums/group.php?groupid=1930
GTA 6 Thread
https://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?819300-GTA-6-Reveal-Trailer
"We're nice mainly because we're rich and comfortable."
Syria and Russia attacking medical infrastructure is also bad.
POVG, At 29:45 you can see the vehicle burning, and the Russian journalists says so, anyway.
Tureuki, I congratulate you on your honesty, but that's not the kind of thing you retaliate on, even if they did as you say. Not if the country that does that is itnerested in being called a civilised country, anyway.
Russia's not allowing the helicopters to collect the turkish casualties in the airstrike was also a terrible thing to do.
The Truth is Hate for those who hate the Truth.
The Armenian Issuehttp://www.twcenter.net/forums/group.php?groupid=1930
GTA 6 Thread
https://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?819300-GTA-6-Reveal-Trailer
"We're nice mainly because we're rich and comfortable."
Here are a variety of sources on Turkish-coalition forces bombing hospitals, ambulances and kidnapping medical staff.
https://amp.theguardian.com/world/20...lance-in-syria
https://www.thecanary.co/feature/201...ern-syria/amp/
https://morningstaronline.co.uk/arti...turkish-attack
I guess you agree with the dubiousness of ioannis76's material that you felt the need to look for other examples. The one you could come up with are not much less dubious as well. The first link tries to pass an ambulance receiving sharapnel fire, not direct fire, as if the ambulance was directly targeted. The second tries to pass fire on a random seemingly unmarked dirty SUV as a direct attack on an ambulance. Third one is strictly from YPG sources with no efforts to provide any substance. The least you could do is to acknowledge how dubious ioannis76's source was.
The Armenian Issuehttp://www.twcenter.net/forums/group.php?groupid=1930
GTA 6 Thread
https://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?819300-GTA-6-Reveal-Trailer
"We're nice mainly because we're rich and comfortable."
And also the hospital in Afrin, I might add. But Turkey, of course denies it all.
Furthermore, the fate of Christians in NE Syria:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79IxYKmAc3o
The Truth is Hate for those who hate the Truth.
A Turkish ex-counter terrorism official lays out a laundry list of Erdogan’s partnership with Isis and makes a strong case for international prosecution.
https://investigativejournal.org/try...zu6xNLdaLbQBQU
Is ISIS has anything to do with current refugee crisis in the region?
A lot of Turkish proxies in Syria are just former ISIS units that changed flags. Which makes it a strong possibility that a lot of "refugees" could be affiliated with ISIS, especially since that was the case with the previous invasion waves from 2015.
Turkey-backed thugs cutting off water supply in Hasakah:
https://syria.liveuamap.com/en/2020/...ater-pipelines
The Truth is Hate for those who hate the Truth.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/syrian-ai...155004116.html
OPCW for the first time through its new investigative unit has found through their investigation that the Syrian government was responsible for a chemica weapon attack in Hama of 2017.
So much for that red line.
They can also claim that Assad was responsible for Coronavirus and disappearance of Carol Baskin's husband. Political "investigation" is political.
No evidence that Assad had any motivation to commit such an attack to begin with, aside from the low-iq "muh ebil dictator killing his own people just cause" narrative from Western propaganda.
No actual evidence tying Syrian government to this has been presented.
Jihadist groups, on the other hand, did have to gain from attack. And regimes that back them have access to such weapons.
Its just a Western-centered agency saying things that correspond to interests of its host, nothing more.
Except the OPCW did present evidence. They sent a team into Syria to investigate.
https://www.opcw.org/media-centre/ne...ification-team
Thats their more detailed report. The idea they have no evidence is a blatant lie.
You have no evidence that the rebels conducted any attacks. The countries that supported the rebels that also possess chemical weapons are irrelevant unless you have proof they supplied the rebels with those weapons.
Still waiting on the proof for the OPCW being biased.