So - as is the role of the opposition in a functioning democracy, you hold the Government to account and challenge their policies. That's right alt-right kiddies, you're meant to work within the system, not threaten to throw your opponents in jail. Lock up this thread.
Anyway, one of the challenges with Donald's presidency is that his campaign hasn't exactly been well fleshed out on policies, and the policies that have been released aren't clear on how they will work. Some of the more unamerican policies, such as banning people entry to the US based on their religion will be a serious test of American democratic institutions.
There is also the small matter of Donald being due in court in a month on the allegation that he raped a thirteen year old girl.
It's hard to even find solid answers to what Donald's campaign wants to do in the first 100 days. Take this for example:
http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37741792restrictions on White House officials becoming lobbyists after they leave office;
term limits for members of Congress;
the cancellation of all payments to UN climate change programmes and the redeployment of those funds to fix US infrastructure;
the start of the process of "removing the more than two million criminal, illegal immigrants" - and the denial of visa-free travel to countries who refused to take back their citizens
The issue of US infrastructure was brought up in Donald's acceptance speech, where he promised to fix the roads and make the United States' airports "second to none". But the source of the funding has already become contradictory. Above, he intends to source it by cancelling payments to UN climate change programs, which will horrify all with two brain cells to rub together as well as not provide the necessary investment, but in the last days of the campaign, Donald's people claimed they would simply privatise roads instead:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/...d_bridges.html
So huge questions remain about what a Donald presidency actually looks like.