So yesterday, Russia lost the vote for its place in UNHRC for the first time since 2006.
Granted, Russia has a rather poor history with human rights (from Yeltsin bombarding democratically elected parliament with tanks to give himself dictatorial powers back in October '93, to the infamous article 282 in Russia's criminal code which allows to ban anything or persecute anyone based on an extremely vague definition of "hate speech"), but... Saudi Arabia got re-elected.
Yes, the country with perhaps worst human rights situation on planet. Country which is the biggest sponsor of radical islamist terrorism all over the world, country which executes gays and non-muslims, which de-facto has legalized rape and is pretty much practicing slavery still got re-elected.
UN has tried to create some kind of human-rights-protecting body before, and that ended up a failure every time. UNHRC is not an exception, since it is easily being manipulated by questionable regimes to influence its decision in their favor. Its re-election is even more ridiculous, in the light of ongoing humanitarian catastrophe in Yemen, which is caused by severe bombing of civilians targets by Saudi military and Saudi support for terrorist groups within Syria as well.
So what does it tell us about UNHRC and UN in general? Why is it so easily manipulated by pretty much worst regimes on the planet? Do non-governmental international bodies really fulfill their purpose as mediators in global affairs, or are the just pawns of specific state/interest groups who use them for their own geopolitical goals? Does UN belong in the past together with League of Nations and other international bodies who failed to fulfill the purpose of their existence, or is there still a chance that it could be reformed?





Reply With Quote









