Page 22 of 22 FirstFirst ... 1213141516171819202122
Results 421 to 430 of 430

Thread: Rad compares units - a thread for balancing.

  1. #421
    QuintusSertorius's Avatar EBII Hod Carrier
    Artifex

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,554

    Default Re: Rad compares units - a thread for balancing.

    Quote Originally Posted by ramsesii View Post
    Yes I know Xystophoroi has 10/21.
    For the other stats, I know I can read the EDU

    Still I wonder if 8/21 is intentional.
    It means Hippeis with their stats fall in the category of best alround cav.
    They have decent defence: 4 Arm 6 def
    Their melee is average.
    Their charge is above average.
    The morale is average.

    So again why wre Hippeis consdered as average to bad cav.

    The point Im trying to make is that iff Hippeis are so similar why bother with Xystophoroi.
    I mean from RL perspective. Iff Hippeis had a reasonable charge why then create a unit that does one thing marginaly better for the loss of other things, It makes no sense to me.
    Are they meant to have a kontos as mainweapon. and another overhand spear as secudary, feels and looks odd
    Yes, it's intentional. Weapon stats are based on the weapon used, not some arbitrary decision about "balance", it's shorter than the lance used by the Xystophoroi. Lacking power_charge, their primary attack is significantly worse than that of Xystophoroi, or any other proper lancer cavalry. The secondary spear is often worse than the kopis used by other lancers up close (and they have that because they didn't used to have a secondary weapon at all, which made them useless in melee).

    If you don't know why Hippeis and Xystophoroi both exist, try looking at where you can recruit them. They are different regional expressions of medium cavalry, Hippeis are the older Greek form, Xystophoroi the more "modern" Hellenistic form.

  2. #422
    Jurand of Cracow's Avatar History and gameplay!
    Artifex

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Cracovia
    Posts
    2,494

    Default Re: Rad compares units - a thread for balancing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tactics Mayers View Post
    Speaking of Barbarian Units and their achilles heel towards armored infantry...

    Is it just me or Heavily Armored Infantry are too OP? It's very noticable as I've played factions with either too few truely heavy infantry (Barbarians) or almost no infantry at all (Nomadic).

    All the high atk power of the barbarians does squat when 3 of their men die for every 1 armored infantry they take down every second. You either hope you have cavalry to flank them, anti-armor units or the army leader dies and even then you are left with units of infantry utterly weakened by losses.
    IMO: this feels right for the melee. However, I think the problem is the charge mechanics in the EBII. Because of low hit-rates (slow killing), the same time of charge inflicts much less damage than in the other mods. I think it has adverse effect on the barbarians warriors in the EBI: the charge doesn't give the initial punch, as it should historically do, imo. The least what could be done, is to increase the charge values, or provide more barbarian units with the "powerful_charge" attribute (some units do have it.)

  3. #423
    ramsesii's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Fryslân
    Posts
    178

    Default Re: Rad compares units - a thread for balancing.

    I think you mis the point.

    I know the difference between Hippeis and Xystophoroi .

    Its just that hippeis perform so good in game that it doesn't reflect the average name they had.
    - Powercharge is IMO overrated, the difference is verry situational.
    - their secundary attack is often equal to the Kopis because of the low armour in this game, ergo AP isnt super powerful.

    Because of both imo the stat differences arent big enough to give both units a different feel.
    lowering the CB with 4 or 5 would give both a whole differend feel.



    just my opinion
    Living in the Netherland but am a Frisian the noblest of Germans. NOW playing SAI Julian campaign, http://www.unihorn.nl
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, Isaac Asimov
    F@ck de massa, grijp de Kassa, Bas Hoorn 2009

  4. #424
    QuintusSertorius's Avatar EBII Hod Carrier
    Artifex

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,554

    Default Re: Rad compares units - a thread for balancing.

    Quote Originally Posted by ramsesii View Post
    I think you mis the point.

    I know the difference between Hippeis and Xystophoroi .

    Its just that hippeis perform so good in game that it doesn't reflect the average name they had.
    - Powercharge is IMO overrated, the difference is verry situational.
    - their secundary attack is often equal to the Kopis because of the low armour in this game, ergo AP isnt super powerful.

    Because of both imo the stat differences arent big enough to give both units a different feel.
    lowering the CB with 4 or 5 would give both a whole differend feel.



    just my opinion
    No, I just don't agree with the point you are making, which is that we should make gamey adjustments to weapon stats for no reason other than your opinion.

    Charge bonuses are based on the weapon used, nothing else.

    Charges working at all is "situational", if you execute a proper charge, you will get power_charge. The kopis matters most when dealing with heavily armoured infantry (like Hoplitai) and heavier cavalry (like bodyguards).

    Quote Originally Posted by Jurand of Cracow View Post
    IMO: this feels right for the melee. However, I think the problem is the charge mechanics in the EBII. Because of low hit-rates (slow killing), the same time of charge inflicts much less damage than in the other mods. I think it has adverse effect on the barbarians warriors in the EBI: the charge doesn't give the initial punch, as it should historically do, imo. The least what could be done, is to increase the charge values, or provide more barbarian units with the "powerful_charge" attribute (some units do have it.)
    Celtic warrior-grade units have power_charge because it was a specific facet of their style of warfare.
    Last edited by QuintusSertorius; May 10, 2019 at 09:46 AM.

  5. #425

    Default Re: Rad compares units - a thread for balancing.

    Uiroi Nantuon (Silurian Warband) vs Gaisatoi (Those of the Spear) and Nedes Nesamoi (Celtic Retainers)

    Silurians have a melee attack of 9, Gaisatoi and Nedes Nesamoi have a melee attack of 8. Seems fishy to me.
    I recommend a pugio rather than a spear, because in close quarters combat, a dagger will serve you better than a spear.

    Rad, 2016.

  6. #426

    Default Re: Rad compares units - a thread for balancing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rad View Post
    Major report on Sweboz armor.

    One of our fellow forum members pointed out that some Sweboz units have an armor rating of 3 despite not wearing any armor. I reviewed the units and I will list the odd stuff bellow.

    1. Ridanz (early and late) - no armor on rider/horse - armor rating of 2. Western celtic cavalry has the same armor rating, despite having torso armor and leather/bronze helmets. Too high.

    2. Herunoudozez - Bodyguard infantry - 1 helmet, 2 suits of mail and 2 models wearing clothes, no leg protection - armor rating of 6. It's hard to find a unit to compare it to, but this feels a bit too high.

    3. Herunoudozez (Germanic Heavy Infantry) - initially 1 wooden helmet and one mail armor - armor rating of 4. Also hard to find a unit to compare it to, but feels a bit too high.

    4. Langabardo Halithoz (Lombard Warriors) - no armor - armor rating of 3. Too high.

    5. Dugunthiz Early and Late (Germanic Veteran Spearman) - no armor - armor rating of 3. Too high.

    6. Skathinawiskaniz Harjoz (Early Scandinavian Spearmen) - I think they have 1 wooden helmet, no body and leg protection - armor rating of 3. Too high.

    7. Basternai Draugai (Basternian Companions) - initially 1 leather scale armor, no head/leg protection - armor rating of 3. Too high.

    The armor rating for units 4, 5 and 6 should drop to 1 while the others should lose 1 point.
    Anything happening with this? These are core and elite units.
    I recommend a pugio rather than a spear, because in close quarters combat, a dagger will serve you better than a spear.

    Rad, 2016.

  7. #427
    QuintusSertorius's Avatar EBII Hod Carrier
    Artifex

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,554

    Default Re: Rad compares units - a thread for balancing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rad View Post
    Anything happening with this? These are core and elite units.
    There's been a general reduction by a point.

  8. #428

    Default Re: Rad compares units - a thread for balancing.

    Quote Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius View Post
    There's been a general reduction by a point.
    The Langabardo Halithoz (Lombard Warriors), Dugunthiz Early and Late (Germanic Veteran Spearman) and Skathinawiskaniz Harjoz (Early Scandinavian Spearmen) now have an armor rating of 2? Still too much for them.
    I recommend a pugio rather than a spear, because in close quarters combat, a dagger will serve you better than a spear.

    Rad, 2016.

  9. #429

    Default Re: Rad compares units - a thread for balancing.

    Something that's bothering me for sometime is what kind of armor the HA units like the Aorsi and Alan Horse Archers are wearing that let's them have 3 defense when compared with the others only having 2?

    The description in the Aorsi HA say they are wearing "simple armor". What kind of armor it is? Is it leather armor or something similar? They don't look different comparing them side-by-side to the others having only 2 defense.
    Last edited by Tactics Mayers; May 21, 2019 at 07:52 AM.

  10. #430

    Default Re: Rad compares units - a thread for balancing.

    So, I was reading the description of the Aswar I Mad (Median cavalry). It says "the spear is suitable in individual combat [...] rather than charge home as one would with the kontos." Yet, they have a charge value of 21 and the powerful charge attribute.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •