I've always been a big fan of English archery, naturally liking any kind of lethal missile and also being mostly English blooded it makes sense.
Anyway I read some stuff that made me wonder how different it really is in M2 compared to what it was like in M1 where the Longbowmen would win you battle after battle, esspecially infantry battles in Europe, not quite as much with Middle East battles.
Anyhow someone mentioned Venice had the better archers or at least appeared to. I figured I would find out, thought I'd post up the results in case anyone wanted to discuss them.
Heres the practical test.
Units:
1 x (91)Unit of Retinue Longbowmen
1 x (91)Unit of Venetian Archers
Stats: (maxed out with upgrades and experience)
Retinue Longbowmen - Attack 15/8 Defense 19
Venetian Archers - Attack 15/9 Defense 17
Map:
Grassy plain to exclude terrain factors.
Results by difficulty level because everyone plays different levels.
*****************
Retinue Longbowmen - versus - Venetian Archers
M / 63 - 0
H / 66 - 0
VH/ 60 - 0
Everytime the longbowmen wiped out the enemy and with the same results speaking in average terms.
Some methods I used in the test.
At deployment I lined my longbowmen up in as wide a formation as I possibly could so about 2 rows.
Then marched them toward the enemy at walk speed, enemy also walked towards me at walk speed at the same time.
My longbowmen stopped and took aim with the first volley well before the Venetians, say 20/30meters in real terms. A handfull had died before they got into range to return fire.
One they were in range they switched to loose formation and returned fire till it was over.
Every single time it was acted out the same.
Results the same.
I thought about posting pics or whatever but its easier for you to just try it.
Anyone else got any other archers they want to bet can beat Longbows?
Only infantry bow units count, no x-bows either although I think they would all get owned too..![]()




Reply With Quote










