[HS] Young Kings

[A Man]

Are we playing on a smaller unit scale? Or is something here f-ed up?

[Parafix]

Yeah i think it's smaller units size, confused the crap out of me when i loaded the save.

[A Man]

I hope it does not affect the overpowered naval AR.

Oh, and I just saw the message. I thought Para was refering to the situation he was in in NBIII, where they cheated and teamed up on him. So Ser Elmond, NO DIPLOMACY, none at all.

[Ser Elmond Starr]

I hope it does not affect the overpowered naval AR.

Oh, and I just saw the message. I thought Para was refering to the situation he was in in NBIII, where they cheated and teamed up on him. So Ser Elmond, NO DIPLOMACY, none at all.

Regarding diplomacy, I was affected by it by another player in Newbloods V, so I thought it was allowed. The rules say: NO ALLIANCES/NO BENDING. That doesn't really include "diplomacy". But if you say so then I apologize.

[A Man]

https://www.mediafire.com/?qnqa40448p20rfw Narrow Sea up... whoever it is.

[Riverknight]

I'll wait a little bit, if not I will sub for the first turn.

[Narion]

Sorry for yesterday I had some bad issues with this game, wasn't working for me properly and I wasn't sure if I will be able to play at all. Now I am back in game.

Iron Throne up http://www.mediafire.com/download/tv...onThrone_2.sav

[zender9]

Tyrell Up
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54...ew?usp=sharing

Battles Againts Starks
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54...ew?usp=sharing

Rules says ''

NO WATCHTOWERS. You may place them during your turn to get a better view, but you must reload after placing them.''

Starks built one
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B54...ew?usp=sharing
Admin can check my turn if picture is not enough.

[Ser Elmond Starr]

The King in the North is Up: http://www.mediafire.com/download/9r...YG_North_2.sav
Idk if I should post this now, considering Stark's rule break, but whatever.

[A Man]

No need to apologise. Everyone can misinterpretate the rules, just clearing it up so no more fallouts happen in the future (though there probably will be a fallout 5... 6... 7... and so on )

[Parafix]

Won't be doing turn till get the okay from River. I believe i may of put more than one down, so happy to take a fine. (Re doing turn won't be too good for Lanny)

[Riverknight]

The turn can precede, I will upload a new save shortly. Stark will be fined as will anyone else who breaks the rules.

Save has been sent**

[Parafix]

Lanny laying siege to two forts with 1 unit each, my forces outnumber them completely but due to mp's lost i cant just destroy them. Not seeing it in the rules but surely laying siege like this is not allowed?

[A Man]

I fail to see what does he gain from besieging with 1 unit? You can't move anyway, while he can't even engage without at least 2 turn wait (for siege equipment).

[zender9]

You can do the same thing.In rules it says if b faction defeat a faction (a comes before b) next turn a faction cant move his army.So its totally fair.
A man its because there was 4 units in the fort can move.

[Parafix]

Never seen that allowed in any HS before, so waiting on River.

[zender9]

Never seen that allowed in any HS before, so waiting on River.

http://i.hizliresim.com/RBjZbj.jpg
this picture from this hotseat : http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...ampaign-mod-2)
Im France in that one as you can see portugal done same thing to me he even got ladder.

[Adanedhel]

There is one thing he gains after successfully sieging your forts for a full turn and that is lowering its garrison a bit. Besides, ladders cost only 15 siege points, so a single (unscathed) unit should be able to build it, allowing reinforcements to take the fort next turn.

Edit: I'm not saying that this is legal or not, since it's not my place to do so. I'm just merely stating the benefits of sieging in this situation, since A Man asked.

[A Man]

There is one thing he gains after successfully sieging your forts for a full turn and that is lowering its garrison a bit. Besides, ladders cost only 15 siege points, so a single (unscathed) unit should be able to build it, allowing reinforcements to take the fort next turn.

A ladder, yes. But there are no ladders when besieging forts, right? Only battering rams.

[Parafix]

Waiting on River, no point bringing your opinions in.