-
November 21, 2006, 01:19 PM
#1
Re: Annotations of the All
Empirism is the belief that all must be proven beyond doubt before being accepted no? If so the only thing that can be proven beynd doubt, through rationalism, is self
-
November 21, 2006, 01:30 PM
#2
Re: Annotations of the All
No, not at all. Sorry, empiricism has nothing to do with Descartes' rationalist method of doubt, which you describe.
-
November 21, 2006, 01:35 PM
#3
Re: Annotations of the All
I was using Descartes to illustrate an aspect of my Empirist beliefs. Extreme Empirism being that nothing can be proven? I was showing the one exception to that
-
November 21, 2006, 01:40 PM
#4
Re: Annotations of the All
No; that's extreme rationalism; extreme empiricism takes the view that all knowledge is gathered through the senses and we start off as tabula rasa...
-
November 21, 2006, 01:48 PM
#5
Re: Annotations of the All
Indeed, and with Bekeley's refution of the proof given by the senses the two became intertwined. Berkeley was an Empirist, yet he also refuted that anything was certain to exist
-
November 21, 2006, 01:50 PM
#6
Re: Annotations of the All
But he still believed knowledge was attained through the senses, just not certain knowledge; Descartes did not believe the senses gave anything.
I'll split this off... rationalist/empiricist disctinction is another debate.
-
November 21, 2006, 01:55 PM
#7
Re: Rationalist/Empiricist Definitions
Hume believed that only as long as it could be assumed that what was before him was real, Berkeley refuted that it could be assumed as such
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules