Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Rationalist/Empiricist Definitions

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Annotations of the All

    Empirism is the belief that all must be proven beyond doubt before being accepted no? If so the only thing that can be proven beynd doubt, through rationalism, is self

  2. #2
    Tom Paine's Avatar Mr Common Sense
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Silver Spring, Maryland (inside the Beltway)
    Posts
    33,698

    Default Re: Annotations of the All

    No, not at all. Sorry, empiricism has nothing to do with Descartes' rationalist method of doubt, which you describe.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Annotations of the All

    I was using Descartes to illustrate an aspect of my Empirist beliefs. Extreme Empirism being that nothing can be proven? I was showing the one exception to that

  4. #4
    Tom Paine's Avatar Mr Common Sense
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Silver Spring, Maryland (inside the Beltway)
    Posts
    33,698

    Default Re: Annotations of the All

    No; that's extreme rationalism; extreme empiricism takes the view that all knowledge is gathered through the senses and we start off as tabula rasa...

  5. #5

    Default Re: Annotations of the All

    Indeed, and with Bekeley's refution of the proof given by the senses the two became intertwined. Berkeley was an Empirist, yet he also refuted that anything was certain to exist

  6. #6
    Tom Paine's Avatar Mr Common Sense
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Silver Spring, Maryland (inside the Beltway)
    Posts
    33,698

    Default Re: Annotations of the All

    But he still believed knowledge was attained through the senses, just not certain knowledge; Descartes did not believe the senses gave anything.

    I'll split this off... rationalist/empiricist disctinction is another debate.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Rationalist/Empiricist Definitions

    Hume believed that only as long as it could be assumed that what was before him was real, Berkeley refuted that it could be assumed as such

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •