Will "No raze/sack" be incorporated into this mod?

[AngryPolack]

Just wondering what changes to the campaign AI you guys are planning? The no raze/sack except nomads is essential imho. Is it even possible to make any substantial changes to the campaign AI?

[Petellius]

I'm not sure I want to do that. We'll only remove razing if absolutely necessary.

[ipwnu678]

Sacking should definitely stay, barbarians were sacking Rome prior to most game timelines. Razing shouldn't be too much of a problem, in vanilla the most razing is done by the Huns due to the fact that they aren't allowed to occupy settlements, so they can only sack or raze. I guess in vanilla they get bored of sacking quickly.

[Spadde]

sacking is essential , I dont always want to capture a region, sometimes I just want the money.

Razing is a subjective issue, this is what submods are for.

[AngryPolack]

Don't you guys find that the AI sacks/razes most of the time, hampering their progression? Usually the AI will just sack and run away, killing immersion and not advancing into the players territory. Will sack/raze mod be compatible?

[Petellius]

I haven't actually given the Attila campaign the light of day. Attila bores me.

[ipwnu678]

You're not the only one

[ABH2]

The AI's priorities can be readjusted here rather easily. There should be no reason to remove conquest options.